Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The truth behind the new Club World Cup

(Photo by Ryan Hiscott/INPHO via EPCR)

Mark McCafferty, the former chief executive of Premiership Rugby, believes agreement for a new Club World Cup could be signed in October and launched in 2024 as part of a radical shake-up of the sport globally.

ADVERTISEMENT

The new club competition would be staged before the planned introduction of a new Nations Championship based on the July and November international windows involving all the major playing countries in different conferences. While McCafferty is hoping to debut the club competition – to take place every four years – in 2024, the Nations Championship is now pencilled in to start in 2026.

McCafferty stepped down as Premiership Rugby CEO after 14 years in 2019 and is currently a Director of European Professional Club Rugby (EPCR) who run the Heineken Champions Cup. He is also an advisor to CVC Capital Partners, the private equity company, that has bought a share of the Six Nations and leading European leagues.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

McCafferty told RugbyPass: “If it stays on track then by October/November we could have agreement. There are certain points in a sports’ development where you have to seize the moment and there is a growing feeling that if rugby can deliver on the global stage a new international competition – Nations Championship – combining the July and November tests windows and a new Club World Cup using existing weeks in the calendar then it is good for everyone.

“It is not adding a new competition it is enhancing existing competitions once every four years. We are giving players and fans the opportunity to see who is the best club in the world with the chance for say Toulouse to face the Crusaders or Brumbies taking on Saracens. I think it is very appetising and that’s the response we have had.

Related

“Now, we have to make all the numbers work and those are the ongoing discussions. The starting point depends on a number of things and the date for the Nations competition is looking like 2026 and so for the club competition it could be 2024 or 2025. We have to make sure we give ourselves enough time and that is part of the current discussions with Super Rugby.

“Super Rugby have some challenges in locking down the new Super Rugby Pacific tournament for post-2023 and there are local issues to be sorted. We have lined up the calendar and the International Players Association have been involved and are happy with it and while there is still lot of detail to be finalised the direction of travel is promising. But, these things till take a lot of nailing down.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The emergence of CVC as a major financial player in rugby has raised concerns that they will have undue influence over the future of the sport as they search for a return on the hundreds of millions already invested. McCafferty denies this is the case and said: “CVC are supportive of the club competition, but the primary driving force comes from EPCR and Super Rugby Pacific. Clearly they (CVC) are a big share holder (in rugby) but they don’t approach things by calling the shots and I do lot of work with them.

“They want rugby to be ambitious and have more global platforms and that is in their interest. We also have 40 clubs across Europe plus 12 in Super Rugby – that is 52 clubs – who would have the opportunity to qualify into this competition once every four years before think about expansion into new markets. If now you have a domestic and European/Asia-Pacific platform but add a global one then it is interesting.

Related

“There is an underlying principle that the existing primary partners in the Champions Cup and Super Rugby – both TV and title – would have rights in the new competition. From their point of view they would have rights that carry through into the Club World Cup. We are not selling at that level because we want to honour those contracts and we would probably add to it at a secondary level. That was one of the key commercial principles and we are trying to enhance Champions Cup and Super Rugby Pacific and make them even more valuable. We are adding not substituting.”

McCafferty has been at the heart of the drive for a world club competition and is confident the playing seasons of the two Hemispheres now allow it to happen and confirmed the Japanese club champions would be taking part. “I don’t know if you can describe it as my baby but I am certainly doing a lot of work to try and bring an agreement together. It needs a bit of driving force behind it to say the very least and that is what I have been doing for some time. My first paper to World Rugby about it was some time ago and it has been a while being nurtured. The time may well be right to do it now as things are coming together.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The first element goes back to the World Rugby global calendar conference in San Francisco which took place in 2017 and one of the main things that came out of that was to move the international window into July from June.

“That was a key staging post. A couple of years later, before COVID, we reached the conclusion we could not add any more weeks into the rugby calendar and so the only way to consider this was to say that once every four years we would combine the existing knock out stages of the Champions Cup and Super Rugby. That was the other breakthrough.

“The building blocks were then in place and now it is about fine tuning. The hope and expectation is we can see the launch of two new competitions while using existing weeks in the calendar.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
A
Andrew 881 days ago

Sadly, the Super sides, and even the Crusaders would get a hiding now from the northern clubs.

A
Another 882 days ago

It would be something I’d like to see, but the costs and logistics would be enormous.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC
Search