Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Common ground was found': Why Fiji jerseys omitted 'Vaccinate' message

Fiji captain Leone Nakarawa dejected after another All Blacks try. All Blacks v Fiji, Steinlager Series, international rugby union test match. FMG Stadium Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand. Saturday 17 July 2021. © Copyright Photo: Bruce Lim / www.photosport.nz

For all the quality of their on-pitch performances against the All Blacks this Steinlager series, Fiji have nonetheless continued to face ongoing controversy around the topic of their jersey sponsorship.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ahead of their first test against the All Blacks on 10th July, the Flying Fijian’s major sponsor, Fijian Airlines, had agreed to allow their prime advertising position on the front of the playing jerseys to be replaced with a message reading “Vaccinate Fiji”.

This was largely considered to be a move to help combat the impact COVID-19 has had in Fiji in recent times.

Video Spacer

The All Blacks were more composed in their rematch with Fiji on Saturday.

Video Spacer

The All Blacks were more composed in their rematch with Fiji on Saturday.

Indeed, Fiji head coach Vern Cotter in the lead up to the first test expressed the initial position of the squad as being one of support for the message to be advertised.

“Our Fijian rugby players … are honoured to carry forward a message that will help our people and our country emerge from the COVID crisis,” Cotter said.

When the side took the field for the first test in Dunedin however, it was in ‘clean’ jerseys, bearing no advertising at all.

When questioned as to why the sudden change had taken place, Cotter referenced the complexity of the issue and a lack of appropriate consultation with the players in the lead up to the match. Cotter also remained certain that a conclusion could be reached in time for the second test after further discussions with the players midweek.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the week leading up to the second test on 17th July, it emerged that discussions were ongoing between the players and the Fiji Rugby Union in the hopes of finding a solution. Following these discussions, a successful conclusion appeared to have been reached by 15th July, when Fiji Rugby chief executive John O’Connor announced the team would wear jerseys displaying the “Vaccinate Fiji” message, albeit with a caveat for the second test.

Come the second test on Saturday evening in Hamilton however and the jerseys once more did not feature the vaccination message, rather simply sporting the normal Fiji Airways sponsor.

Asked post-match the reasons behind this second sudden change Cotter pointed to the difficult nuances surrounding the decision that faced his team.

“Like I said last week, it’s a complex issue,” he said. “The major sponsor offered the spot to ‘Vaccinate Fiji’, but there were questions around whether or not that was a directive. [The situation] came back to being a choice.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Cotter, who himself revealed his knowledge of the stance came just a day before the match, went on to state that the message’s core aim of awareness had arguably already been achieved in some capacity throughout the week.

“It was all about awareness,” said Cotter. “I think this week with everyday people talking about it, [the message] got aired quite well. I think the awareness worked … I think what everybody wanted was achieved … The space on the jersey went back to the major sponsor and everyone thought, ‘Perhaps the job’s been done, we’ll just put the major sponsor back on and move on’. That’s effectively what happened. It was the union, the CEO and board, and the sponsor.”

The financial impact on Fiji Airways was also touched upon by Cotter.

“You can understand that Fiji Airways are suffering a little bit because of COVID and the fact that there is no tourism and no activity for the airline,” he said. “Everybody’s aware of that, the players know they’re the major sponsor and that they’re hurting. This seemed to be the fair way of representing that major sponsor. I think common ground was found and hopefully everybody’s happy.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 5 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol!


It's incredible to see the boys playing like this. Back to the form that saw them finish on top of the regular season and beat Toulon to win the challenge cup. Ibitoye and Ravouvou doing a cracking Piutau/Radradra impression.


It's abundantly clear that Borthwick and Wigglesworth need to transform the England attack and incorporate some of the Bears way. Unfortunately until the Bears are competing in Europe, the old criticisms will still be used.. we failed to fire any punches against La Rochelle and Leinster which goes to show there is still work to do but both those sides are packed full of elite players so it's not the fairest comparison to expect Bristol to compete with them. I feel Bristol are on the way up though and the best is yet to come. Tom Jordan next year is going to be obscene.


Test rugby is obviously a different beast and does Borthwick have enough time with the players to develop the level of skill the Bears plays have? Even if he wanted to? We should definitely be able to see some progress, Scotland have certainly managed it. England aren't going to start throwing the ball around like that but England's attack looks prehistoric by comparison, I hope they take some inspiration from the clarity and freedom of expression shown by the Bears (and Scotland - who keep beating us, by the way!). Bristol have the best attack in the premiership, it'd be mad for England to ignore it because it doesn't fit with the Borthwick and Wigglesworth idea of how test rugby should be played. You gotta use what is available to you. Sadly I think England will try reluctantly to incorporate some of these ideas and end up even more confused and lacking identity than ever. At the moment England have two teams, they have 14 players and Marcus Smith. Marcus sticks out as a sore thumb in a team coached to play in a manner ideologically opposed to the way he plays rugby, does the Bears factor confuse matters further? I just have no confidence in Borthers and Wiggles.


Crazy to see the Prem with more ball in play than SR!

7 Go to comments
J
JW 9 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

In another recent article I tried to argue for a few key concept changes for EPCR which I think could light the game up in the North.


First, I can't remember who pointed out the obvious elephant in the room (a SA'n poster?), it's a terrible time to play rugby in the NH, and especially your pinnacle tournament. It's been terrible watching with seemingly all the games I wanted to watch being in the dark, hardly able to see what was going on. The Aviva was the only stadium I saw that had lights that could handle the miserable rain. If the global appeal is there, they could do a lot better having day games.


They other primary idea I thuoght would benefit EPCR most, was more content. The Prem could do with it and the Top14 could do with something more important than their own league, so they aren't under so much pressure to sell games. The quality over quantity approach.


Trim it down to two 16 team EPCR competitions, and introduce a third for playing amongst the T2 sides, or the bottom clubs in each league should simply be working on being better during the EPCR.


Champions Cup is made up of league best 15 teams, + 1, the Challenge Cup winner. Without a reason not to, I'd distribute it evenly based on each leauge, dividing into thirds and rounded up, 6 URC 5 Top14 4 English. Each winner (all four) is #1 rank and I'd have a seeding round or two for the other 12 to determine their own brackets for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. I'd then hold a 6 game pool, home and away, with consecutive of each for those games that involve SA'n teams. Preferrably I'd have a regional thing were all SA'n teams were in the same pool but that's a bit complex for this simple idea.


That pool round further finalises the seeding for knockout round of 16. So #1 pool has essentially duked it out for finals seeding already (better venue planning), and to see who they go up against 16, 15,etc etc. Actually I think I might prefer a single pool round for seeding, and introduce the home and away for Ro16, quarters, and semis (stuffs up venue hire). General idea to produce the most competitive matches possible until the random knockout phase, and fix the random lottery of which two teams get ranked higher after pool play, and also keep the system identical for the Challenge Cup so everthing is succinct. Top T2 side promoted from last year to make 16 in Challenge Cup

207 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales
Search