Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Controversial former Springboks coach Peter de Villiers sacked by rugby minnows

Former Springboks coach Peter de Villiers. (Photo by Stu Forster/Getty Images)

Former Springboks coach Peter de Villiers has been sacked by rugby minnows Zimbabwe due to unauthorised leave from work, according to documents from the Zimbabwe Rugby Union.

ADVERTISEMENT

De Villiers was fired last month, but has indicated that he will challenge his employer’s decision and appeal his dismissal in a labour court.

The ZRU documents detail how de Villiers, who coached the Springboks from between 2008 and 2011, failed to return to work from a vacation last year.

As a result, he was suspended and then later fired following a disciplinary hearing.

De Villiers was hired by the ZRU on a two-year contract in February 2018 with the intention of getting the tier three nation back into the World Cup for the first time since 1991 via the annual African Gold Cup competition.

The winner of last year’s edition of the tournament would qualify directly into Pool B of the World Cup, while the runner-up would qualify for the repechage round, with the winner of that also gaining entry into Pool B alongside tier one nations New Zealand, South Africa and Italy.

Not only did Zimbabwe fail to finish in the top two of the Gold Cup – Namibia won the tournament, while Kenya finished second but failed to progress from the repechage round – but they finished fifth of six teams, with their only win coming in their final match against Uganda.

A last-placed finish would have seen them relegated from Africa’s premier continental tournament, but a 23-all draw salvaged against sixth-placed Morocco prevented saved De Villiers’ and Zimbabwe’s blushes.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 61-year-old’s reign in charge of Zimbabwe was also troublesome off-field, as he fell out and then fired assistant coach and former Zimbabwe captain Brendan Dawson, accusing him of undermining his authority.

During his time with the Springboks, De Villiers was more successful, but experienced similar off-field issues.

After becoming the first-ever non-white coach of South Africa, he led them to a series win over the British and Irish Lions, a Tri-Nations title in 2009, which included a rare hat-trick of victories over the All Blacks, and the number one spot on the world rankings.

However, he attracted criticism for a number of provocative comments, which included accusing the All Blacks of cheating, and defending one of his players from eye-gouging during the Lions tour by saying rugby was “a contact sport”.

ADVERTISEMENT

After a tense 11-9 defeat to the Wallabies in the quarter-finals of the 2011 World Cup in New Zealand, De Villiers was not offered a new contract by the South African Rugby Union.

In other news:

Video Spacer

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Ex-Wallaby explains why All Blacks aren’t at ‘panic stations’ under Razor Ex-Wallaby explains why All Blacks aren’t at ‘panic stations’
Search