Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Count himself pretty lucky': Scotland escape red card for high clean-out on McDermott

(Photo by Robert Perry/PA Images via Getty Images)

Australian rugby greats have slammed referee Luke Pearce’s decision to not send off Scotland’s Glen Young after a controversial clean-out against the Wallabies.

ADVERTISEMENT

Scotland appeared to be playing with momentum and confidence as the final quarter of the Test at Murrayfield edged ever closer.

A sublime try from flyhalf Blair Kinghorn just after the break, which would’ve impressed any Premier League scout, had the hosts up by six before a penalty shortly after.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Up 15-6, winger Duhan van der Merwe made an impressive break down the left edge in the 56th minute, before Bernard Foley made a try-saving one-on-one tackle.

But controversy followed as scrumhalf Tate McDermott set himself up in a strong position, before Scottish replacement Glen Young attempted to clear him out.

Replays clearly showed Young making contact with McDermott’s head, which saw Stan Sport commentators react as referee Pearce went to the TMO.

“Glen Young, how else do you clean out? That’s the difficult part that’s come in the last 18-months,” two-time World Cup winner Tim Horan said.

ADVERTISEMENT

“If they’re consistent it’s going to be a red card.

“Glen Young can count himself pretty lucky,” Horan added after the decision was made.

Pearce agreed that while Young had come from distance and made contact with McDermott’s head, he downplayed the level of danger involved.

The TMO believed that Young had made “a bicep connection to the face” which the English referee agreed to.

While the Test came to a last minute missed kick, the confusion and controversy over this decision was a talking point during the Stan Sport post-game coverage.

“I just don’t know necessarily where in the lawbook it differentiates between bicep and shoulder,” former Australian winger Drew Mitchell said post-game.

ADVERTISEMENT

“If it’s high and if it’s in the head and if it’s with force and they haven’t slowed their entry point then it’s a red card.

“I don’t know where it differentiates with body parts just the degree of danger.”

Justin Harrison, who played five Test matches against Scotland during his famous career, said it was an “unacceptable” decision.

“We hear a lot of commentary and a lot of people sitting at home saying ‘how is that attacking player supposed to move Tate McDermott away from the ball when he’s got an early position?’ What he’s supposed to do is arrest his momentum and force before the moment of impact,” Harrison said.

“What we don’t want to see is players arriving with maximum force of maximum velocity of 30 metres, coming from an uncontrolled situation and continuing on with that momentum into the head impact region and player welfare concerns.

“What Tate McDermott does is right, getting over the ball. What the arriving player doesn’t do is arrest some of his momentum, correct his entry point and make sure he gets up under, scoops the arms first.

“His first point of contact is the head and that is unacceptable.”

Australian have started their five-match spring tour with a tense 16-15 win over Scotland, but it doesn’t get much tougher than next week’s opponents.

The Wallabies will face world number two France at Stade de France on Sunday morning (AEST), before matches against Italy, Ireland and Wales.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
M
Michael Röbbins (academic and writer extraordinair 746 days ago

The whole bicep thing instead of a shoulder is the epitome of idiocy: it’s all connected mate and momentum, acceleration, and mass of the whole person is involved, not a singular, largely irrelevant to real life, muscle.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Scott Robertson explains the new halves pairing for the All Blacks ahead of France

More indecision and excuses from Razor.


You've given a spot at 6 to Finau whom you haven't even had the courage to use off the bench in the last two games. Now the young enforcer is going into a big much with no rugby, we should expect a similar result to how Aumua struggled to impact a game after he'd hardly been given any chances of the bench either.


Weve now dropped a back three player who also wasn't even given any game time off the bench for someone coming in cold when they really need to have been playing constantly to perform at their best. There are just so many better pictures that should have been present rather than this mickey mouse selection.


I really hope Finau can overcome this, it won't be the first time he's had to. How is the bench even made up? Could you not just have included these changes in the article as well? I actually like BB coming back in, it highlights how courageous he is after sitting out through another concussion that could just as easily sent him back into months of symptoms again.


Dmac was also off his game last week, as was Ratima, with the poor platform Razor and his team have been setting the players up with. He needs to freedom to clear his mind from the clutter that saw him make so many bad decisions last week. It will still probably be a net loss for the team performance not having him on from the start but it should be better for them in the long run if he's allowed to just come on late and play his game trying to claw things back for the team.


With Roigard starting that might prove an outlet for the team to actually get on top first however. Along with Ardie busting a gut in his new role and emptying the tank by halftime, and being replaced by another new star, might mean that Dmac is just icing on the cake at the end.

13 Go to comments
F
Flankly 1 hour ago
Jake White: If I was England coach, I’d have been livid

I am not an England fan, but still very disappointed at what Borthwick is serving up. Regardless of winning or losing, they should be executing the basics at a world class level. That was the reason they replaced Eddie with Steve. After two years England has not built the solid foundations that the RFU were presumably after. Its hard to see it as anything other than a coaching problem.


Having said that I really hope that Rassie has got his team fired up for the game. The Boks at maximum intensity and with no crises (eg red cards) would be expected to win this game. But it does not take much reduction in pressure for Bok teams to lose. The Boks lose when complacency sets in.


On Felix Jones, my guess is that they can't agree on a non-compete so they kept him on payroll for the duration of the Nov tests. The risk was that he would be hired by Rassie or Razor prior to the tests.


As relates to law tweaking, it feels like WR are more comfortable discussing changes in laws than insisting on implementation. For my money the biggest thing they could do is to be strict and consistent in officiating ruck behavior. In every game we see flopping, lazy lying, clearing of unbound players, making plays while off your feet, delays in placing the ball, side entry, offside line infringements, and similar nonsense. It's really really bad, and the WR attitude seems to be that we should turn a blind eye in pursuit of "flowing rugby". In truth it's just boring, because it randomizes the outcome.

11 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Two groups of dancing bears': The cross-code clash making a comeback for charity 'Two groups of dancing bears': The cross-code clash making a comeback for charity
Search