Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Counterproductive and totally inappropriate': World Rugby's Head of Match officials on Erasmus

(Photo by Steve Haag/Gallo Images)

World Rugby’s Head of Match officials Joël Jutge has been left confused with Rassie Erasmus’ attitude towards referees.

ADVERTISEMENT

South Africa’s Director of Rugby Erasmus has yet again made the headlines following the Springboks’ 26-30 defeat to France last Saturday.

In the wake of the French encounter, Erasmus posted a series of tweets – accompanied by videos – which highlighted a number of refereeing decisions made by Wayne Barnes.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

While Erasmus’ tweets were supported by lots of his fans, there were some who did not agree with his methods or his constant attacks on referees.

In one of his social media posts, the Bok boss explained that his tweets are not there to criticise referees. However, it’s simply there to keep the South African public informed.

To make matters worse, Erasmus has only just returned from a stadium ban following a World Rugby suspension for his infamous hour-long video criticising referee Nic Berry’s performance in the first Test between the Springboks and the British and Irish Lions last year.

World Rugby has yet to officially respond to the latest outburst by Erasmus, however, speaking to RugbyRama, Jutge revealed he is disappointed with the 2019 World Cup-winning coach’s actions.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We are very disappointed that he is using social networks to voice his reservations about the refereeing of this or that match,” Jutge said.

“It’s counterproductive and totally inappropriate. But if he does, it’s because his federation authorises him to do so – it’s unfortunate.

“I don’t understand Rassie Erasmus’ attitude.

“What will be done to make him stop? I don’t know. It’s not part of my skills.”

Jutge added that Erasmus’ attitude was a concern to World Rugby, but he didn’t provide any clarity over whether another sanction could be possible.

“His attitude is a concern for World Rugby and Rassie Erasmus’ peers do not share his way of doing things,” Jutge said.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It is contrary to our values, even if this word is sometimes overused. Erasmus does not serve his cause and it is surprising to see him continue in this way.

“All referees are affected by these attacks on referees in general and Wayne Barnes last weekend. Because by doing so, Rassie Erasmus opens the door to violent behaviour and behind it, entire families are insulted and affected.

“It is extremely dangerous. But some people think that if the South African coach talks about a referee like that, they have the right to do it too.”

Source: Rugbyrama

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

8 Comments
M
Michael Röbbins (academic and writer extraordinair 730 days ago

“Contrary to our values” = not the way we’ve done things before and all must stand behind the white line with their hands in pockets and not cross it. The naïveté is stunning.

G
Godfrey 730 days ago

Rugby referees just like players have bad games like Berry and Barnes have had. The difference is that players are roundly criticized by the media and usually dropped after sub-par performances while criticizing referees is somehow off limits and they continue to rake in the $'s no matter how good or bad they are.

P
Peter 730 days ago

There will come a point when the officials refuse to referee any SA tests as it's becoming a serious risk to their (& their families) health and safety. But as it won them a series against the Lions he's hardly going to cease his ranting over a two week ban anytime soon.

T
Thomas 730 days ago

World Rugby has no values you clown

T
Thomas 730 days ago

Joel is just another puppet to the corrupt system.

P
Peter 730 days ago

In a man so clearly ‘inebriated with the exuberance of his own verbosity’ and thinly veiled calumny the chances of self-restraint are not great.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 20 minutes ago
England player ratings vs South Africa | 2024 Autumn Nations Series

As has been the way all year, and for all England's play I can remember. I missed a lot of the better years under Eddie though.


Lets have a look at the LQB for the last few games... 41% under 3 sec compared to 56% last week, 47% in the game you felt England best in against NZ, and 56 against Ireland.


That was my impression as well. Dunno if that is a lack of good counterattack ball from the D, forward dominance (Post Contact Meters stats reversed yesterday compared to that fast Ireland game), or some Borthwick scheme, but I think that has been highlighted as Englands best point of difference this year with their attack, more particularly how they target using it in certain areas. So depending on how you look at it, not necessarily the individual players.


You seem to be falling into the same trap as NZs supporters when it comes to Damien McKenzie. That play you highlight Slade in wasn't one of those LQB situations from memory, that was all on the brilliance of Smith. Sure, Slade did his job in that situation, but Smith far exceeded his (though I understand it was a move Sleightholme was calling for). But yeah, it's not always going to be on a platter from your 10 and NZ have been missing that Slade line, in your example, more often than not too. When you go back to Furbank and Feyi-Waboso returns you'll have that threat again. Just need to generate that ball, wait for some of these next Gen forwards to come through etc, the props and injured 6 coming back to the bench. I don't think you can put Earl back to 7, unless he spends the next two years speeding up (which might be good for him because he's getting beat by speed like he's not used to not having his own speed to react anymore).

7 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ England and their Chief problem England and their Chief problem
Search