Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Courtney Lawes: 'It wasn't nice... but it paid off in the end'

(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Courtney Lawes was like a boxer post-training on Monday at the England training facility in Le Touquet-Paris-Plage, a rolled towel around his neck while he rolled with verbal punches from the media to tee up his team’s Rugby World Cup campaign.

ADVERTISEMENT

Only the fanatics would have given the English hope in hell in August on the back of three defeats in four Summer Nations Series matches, two campaign-ending injuries for two of their chosen 33, and red cards and suspensions for two more.

That calamity carried over into the opening salvo in Marseille on September 9, the naughty Tom Curry exiled less than three minutes into his team’s tournament opener.

Video Spacer

Rugbypass TV

Watch rugby on demand, from exclusive shows and documentaries to extended highlights from RWC 2023. Anywhere. Anytime. All for free!

Join us

Video Spacer

Rugbypass TV

Watch rugby on demand, from exclusive shows and documentaries to extended highlights from RWC 2023. Anywhere. Anytime. All for free!

Join us

And yet here was Lawes 23 days later, sitting in northern French coastal sunshine and shooting the breeze regarding a progress that qualified England with a game to spare for the quarter-finals and now has them believing that rugby is potentially coming home 20 years after they last conquered the world.

He didn’t specifically say England can definitely win this World Cup. Having “a good shot at that cup at the end of it” was as inspiring as it got in that sense. But it’s October, September has been safely negotiated with three pool wins and the knockout stage road ahead is alive with possibilities once next Saturday’s group game versus Samoa in Lille is taken care of.

Team Form

Last 5 Games

1
Wins
3
1
Streak
1
19
Tries Scored
16
22
Points Difference
-13
3/5
First Try
2/5
4/5
First Points
2/5
3/5
Race To 10 Points
3/5

How has it come to this just weeks after the Steve Borthwick blueprint was widely ridiculed as his country’s worst-ever preparation for the tournament? Lawes himself consecutively started three of those warm-up four matches, staying the course against Wales, Ireland and Fiji for all but six minutes in Dublin.

The since-revealed secret, of course, was that England were purposely over-flogging themselves on the training ground, not specifically gearing up to be at their energetic best on those August Saturdays. Performance suffered but Lawes and co refused to blink despite the acrimonious outside noise.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I wouldn’t say it was worrying because we had done all the hard yakka,” he reckoned, sharing his views from a first-floor deck at the Hauts-de-France facility that has been a home from home for England since they first trained there on September 1. “To be honest we went into most of those games pretty tired but we had put in a really good foundation, we had worked really hard in pre-season.

“We knew that and we knew that it would come right, it would start to click for us. We said it after every game, every loss, that we were going to do everything we could to make sure when the World Cup kicks off we’re firing and we did that and we just stuck to it, to be honest. We never gave up and we have given ourselves a really good shot to tip on and do something really great.”

What was the ordeal like, though, having to play Test match rugby with energy levels drained by midweek capers such as having a full-on 15-versus-15 training ground match on the Tuesday before the Ireland defeat?

“It’s tough. You understand it’s not the World Cup so we were still training, preparing for the World Cup in those games. The S&C team were trying to understand how far they could push the boys to still get them to a certain place per the game.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It was all a bit of trying to find the right balance… because essentially it was pre-season. They were warm-up games, not World Cup games. But yeah, it was tough and it wasn’t nice having slightly heavy legs at the start of the games, but you understand why you are doing it and it paid off in the end so fair play.”

Fair play, indeed. Along the way, England have stuck to their blunt tactics and that’s an approach which Lawes, skipper versus Argentina and Japan while Owen Farrell was suspended, is not for turning on. “I like that it is now really obvious every team’s DNA and what they are trying to do,” he said, reflecting on the past four weekends of action across the pools in France.

“All the top teams have got a really different kind of genetics as a team, team strategy and stuff like that, how when they play each other how that is going to play off. That is really good for us as players to see and be a part of and it’s really good for the fanbase to see as a spectacle as well.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Courtney Lawes (@bigcourts89)

“You know, the Ireland-South Africa game, stuff like that, France-New Zealand first night of the World Cup. Things like that are huge for the game and, like I said, every team has got a little bit different strategy, DNA, a different way of playing and that is really good to see.”

So what is the England DNA? “We’re a really strong defensive team. That is probably our backbone; we have conceded one try in the last three games, so that is great, and obviously an aerial kicking team. We are very good at getting the ball back and we’re looking to build attack off that. Hopefully, by the time we get a bit later on in the tournament, that is where we want to be and show people a bit of a different side to us.”

The criticism has continued along the way, however, with England even booed loudly by their own fans in Nice after one feeble kick too many riled them versus the Japanese. “There is not a lot of patience,” he suggested about the ways of the modern world where perfection is immediately demanded.

“New coaching team, first time we had everyone together, completely new team strategy and foundation that we had to build. Stuff like that does take time and we’re fast-tracking as quickly as we can. This weekend is another opportunity to go out there and get better,” he said, going on to share his perspective on social media and the England team.

“Even the young lads understand nowadays social media is what it is. It can be so negative and we are always a team that is always not interested in what other people are saying outside of our group. We knew what we were here to do and what we wanted to achieve. Because we were so focused on that we said there is going to be people saying a lot of different stuff, let them do what they want to do but we’re going to get to work and I guess prove them wrong in a lot of ways.

“We don’t tell anybody what they can and can’t do after a game. It’s up to you and as a young player, you have got to learn to navigate social media and understand what is feedback and what is just people being people on social media now. You have got to be able to roll with the punches. You can’t just say, ‘Don’t look at it, lads’ because it’s everywhere. You have got to learn to deal with it in your own way however that is and everyone is a bit different.”

Lawes certainly is different in what is the 34-year-old’s fourth World Cup. He finds it hard to compare tournaments. “It’s so different apart from Steve. 2011, 2015 and 2019, the coaching team and actually the main team is so different, so it’s quite hard to compare and contrast and know what you do differently because the team was so different.”

Another difference is the family experience this time around. “It’s the first time they really understand because the last World Cup was Japan, so we didn’t get any kids out to that and the one before that (England 2015) my eldest was only about one. They have been all out to watch Argentina and the watch the Japan games, so that’s really quite special for me. To be part of good stadiums as well, everyone loves rugby in France, it’s such a good experience for them.”

Do they know specifically what Dad is trying to do in a match? “Probably not. They know if you make a good carry or if you make a good tackle. My eldest boy loves tackling so he will know what is going on there but he wouldn’t have a clue what is happening at breakdowns. No idea.”

One perspective on England is that they have hidden themselves away from the World Cup, hunkering down in the most English of French towns. The Lawes verdict, though, is that it has the perfect place to plot for October glory. “Le Touquet has been amazing,” he insisted.

“Japan was really good as well. I really enjoyed Japan but this town is actually really, really nice to be a part of. They have made all of us so welcome and there is so much to do, like so many boys playing loads of padel, playing golf, I was playing tennis with David Ribbans on Sunday. We have been able to be able to do loads of really cool stuff.

“There is a crepe place just up the road that is closed now, everyone is a bit gutted the next few weeks. We have been hammering that, and there is the beach and all that stuff. This town has honestly made the World Cup really quite special for us and we have had a really good time here. It has been a really cool spot to come and have as a base camp. The games on top of that, starting off beating Argentina with 14 men was special for us and being able to carry on, be a bit better every game.”

That process will continue in Lille with England set to exit their seaside base on Thursday to head north for their Saturday clash with Samoa and they will then fly south on Sunday for a week in Marseille before their October 15 quarter-final versus the Pool C runner-up. That opposition is currently Australia but is expected to be Fiji, who need just a point more to clinch qualification.

“It’s about us taking steps forward to be the team we want to be because it’s great we are through to the quarter-finals, but that is not the place we want to be. We came here to be the best team we can be and have a good shot at that cup at the end of it. We know it is great to get to the quarter-final. It’s an objective we wanted to achieve but it’s not why we came here. It’s another stepping stone on the path to getting where we want to get to.

“We will leave no stone unturned to get as far as we can in this competition and to push ourselves to win that cup at the end of it. We are going to do everything we can. That’s all we can do and hopefully we can bring the nation along with us.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 16 minutes ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"fl's idea, if I can speak for him to speed things up, was for it to be semifinalists first, Champions Cup (any that somehow didn't make a league semi), then Challenge's semi finalists (which would most certainly have been outside their league semi's you'd think), then perhaps the quarter finalists of each in the same manner. I don't think he was suggesting whoever next performed best in Europe but didn't make those knockouts (like those round of 16 losers), I doubt that would ever happen."


That's not quite my idea.

For a 20 team champions cup I'd have 4 teams qualify from the previous years champions cup, and 4 from the previous years challenge cup. For a 16 team champions cup I'd have 3 teams qualify from the previous years champions cup, and 1 from the previous years challenge cup.


"The problem I mainly saw with his idea (much the same as you see, that league finish is a better indicator) is that you could have one of the best candidates lose in the quarters to the eventual champions, and so miss out for someone who got an easier ride, and also finished lower in the league, perhaps in their own league, and who you beat everytime."

If teams get a tough draw in the challenge cup quarters, they should have won more pool games and so got better seeding. My system is less about finding the best teams, and more about finding the teams who perform at the highest level in european competition.

54 Go to comments
f
fl 53 minutes ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Would I'd be think"

Would I'd be think.


"Well that's one starting point for an error in your reasoning. Do you think that in regards to who should have a say in how it's setup in the future as well? Ie you would care what they think or what might be more fair for their teams (not saying your model doesn't allow them a chance)?"

Did you even read what you're replying to? I wasn't arguing for excluding south africa, I was pointing out that the idea of quantifying someone's fractional share of european rugby is entirely nonsensical. You're the one who was trying to do that.


"Yes, I was thinking about an automatic qualifier for a tier 2 side"

What proportion of european rugby are they though? Got to make sure those fractions match up! 😂


"Ultimately what I think would be better for t2 leagues would be a third comp underneath the top two tournemnts where they play a fair chunk of games, like double those two. So half a dozen euro teams along with the 2 SA and bottom bunch of premiership and top14, some Championship and div 2 sides thrown in."

I don't know if Championship sides want to be commuting to Georgia every other week.


"my thought was just to create a middle ground now which can sustain it until that time has come, were I thought yours is more likely to result in the constant change/manipulation it has been victim to"

a middle ground between the current system and a much worse system?

54 Go to comments
f
fl 1 hour ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Huh? You mean last in their (4 team) pools/regions? My idea was 6/5/4, 6 the max, for guarenteed spots, with a 20 team comp max, so upto 5 WCs (which you'd make/or would be theoretically impossible to go to one league (they'd likely be solely for its participants, say 'Wales', rather than URC specifically. Preferrably). I gave 3 WC ideas for a 18 team comp, so the max URC could have (with a member union or club/team, winning all of the 6N, and Champions and Challenge Cup) would be 9."


That's a lot of words to say that I was right. If (e.g.) Glasgow won the URC and Edinburgh finished 16th, but Scotland won the six nations, Edinburgh would qualify for the Champions Cup under your system.


"And the reason say another URC (for example) member would get the spot over the other team that won the Challenge Cup, would be because they were arguable better if they finished higher in the League."

They would be arguably worse if they didn't win the Challenge Cup.


"It won't diminish desire to win the Challenge Cup, because that team may still be competing for that seed, and if theyre automatic qual anyway, it still might make them treat it more seriously"

This doesn't make sense. Giving more incentives to do well in the Challenge Cup will make people take it more seriously. My system does that and yours doesn't. Under my system, teams will "compete for the seed" by winning the Challenge Cup, under yours they won't. If a team is automatically qualified anyway why on earth would that make them treat it more seriously?


"I'm promoting the idea of a scheme that never needs to be changed again"

So am I. I'm suggesting that places could be allocated according to a UEFA style points sytem, or according to a system where each league gets 1/4 of the spots, and the remaining 1/4 go to the best performing teams from the previous season in european competition.


"Yours will promote outcry as soon as England (or any other participant) fluctates. Were as it's hard to argue about a the basis of an equal share."

Currently there is an equal share, and you are arguing against it. My system would give each side the opportunity to achieve an equal share, but with more places given to sides and leagues that perform well. This wouldn't promote outcry, it would promote teams to take european competition more seriously. Teams that lose out because they did poorly the previous year wouldn't have any grounds to complain, they would be incentivised to try harder this time around.


"This new system should not be based on the assumption of last years results/performances continuing."

That's not the assumption I'm making. I don't think the teams that perform better should be given places in the competition because they will be the best performing teams next year, but because sport should be based on merit, and teams should be rewarded for performing well.


"I'm specifically promoting my idea because I think it will do exactly what you want, increase european rugyb's importance."

how?


"I won't say I've done anything compressive"

Compressive.

54 Go to comments
J
JW 1 hour ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Generally disagree with what? The possibility that they would get whitewashed, or the idea they shouldn't gain access until they're good enough?


I think the first is a fairly irrelevant view, decide on the second and then worry about the first. Personally I'd have had them in a third lvl comp with all the bottom dwellers of the leagues. I liked the idea of those league clubs resting their best players, and so being able to lift their standards in the league, though, so not against the idea that T2 sides go straight into Challenge Cup, but that will be a higher level with smaller comps and I think a bit too much for them (not having followed any of their games/performances mind you).

Because I don't think that having the possibility of a team finishing outside the quarter finals to qualify automatically will be a good idea. I'd rather have a team finishing 5th in their domestic league.

fl's idea, if I can speak for him to speed things up, was for it to be semifinalists first, Champions Cup (any that somehow didn't make a league semi), then Challenge's semi finalists (which would most certainly have been outside their league semi's you'd think), then perhaps the quarter finalists of each in the same manner. I don't think he was suggesting whoever next performed best in Europe but didn't make those knockouts (like those round of 16 losers), I doubt that would ever happen.


The problem I mainly saw with his idea (much the same as you see, that league finish is a better indicator) is that you could have one of the best candidates lose in the quarters to the eventual champions, and so miss out for someone who got an easier ride, and also finished lower in the league, perhaps in their own league, and who you beat everytime.

54 Go to comments
J
JW 1 hour ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Well I was mainly referring to my thinking about the split, which was essentially each /3 rounded up, but reliant on WCs to add buffer.


You may have been going for just a 16 team league ranking cup?


But yes, those were just ideas for how to select WCs, all very arbitrary but I think more interesting in ways than just going down a list (say like fl's) of who is next in line. Indeed in my reply to you I hinted at say the 'URC' WC spot actually being given to the Ireland pool and taken away from the Welsh pool.


It's easy to think that is excluding, and making it even harder on, a poor performing country, but this is all in context of a 18 or 20 team comp where URC (at least to those teams in the URC) got 6 places, which Wales has one side lingering around, and you'd expect should make. Imagine the spice in that 6N game with Italy, or any other of the URC members though! Everyone talks about SA joining the 6N, so not sure it will be a problem, but it would be a fairly minor one imo.


But that's a structure of the leagues were instead of thinking how to get in at the top, I started from the bottom and thought that it best those teams doing qualify for anything. Then I thought the two comps should be identical in structure. So that's were an even split comes in with creating numbers, and the 'UEFA' model you suggest using in some manner, I thought could be used for the WC's (5 in my 20 team comp) instead of those ideas of mine you pointed out.


I see Jones has waded in like his normal self when it comes to SH teams. One thing I really like about his idea is the name change to the two competitions, to Cup and Shield. Oh, and home and away matches.

54 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Stuart Lancaster 'wants out' of Racing 92 and eyeing Euro giants job Stuart Lancaster 'wants out' of Racing 92 and eyeing Euro giants job
Search