Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Cowan-Dickie's Montpellier deal on knife edge after boozy night out

Luke Cowan-Dickie after the Exeter's loss to Saracens

Luke Cowan-Dickie’s much publicized move to Montpellier could be off after he allegedly failed to turn up for a medical due to a boozy night out. The England hooker was set to join the French Top 14 side, but his failure to attend a medical examination has put the move in jeopardy.

ADVERTISEMENT

Cowan-Dickie, who currently plays for Exeter Chiefs and has 44 England caps to his name, was due to prove his fitness under stricter rules surrounding injuries in France. However, multiple reports from the likes of L’Equipe, Midi Olympique and RMC suggest that he failed to attend the second day of his medical, leading to Montpellier reportedly tearing up his lucrative deal.

Neither Montpellier nor the hooker have commented on the situation.

The move to Montpellier had surprised many in the rugby community, as Cowan-Dickie is widely regarded as one of England’s top players. The 29-year-old has been a consistent performer for Exeter and has also been a key figure for England in recent years.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

However, the events of the past few days have thrown his immediate future into doubt. It remains to be seen what the exact circumstances of his alleged boozy night out were and whether they will have a lasting impact on his new career in France.

The move to Montpellier was seen as a major step for Cowan-Dickie, who was reportedly set to earn a substantial salary increase. However, it now appears that his decision to leave Exeter may have been foolhardy.

Related

“Playing for England is the pinnacle of your career, so it’s tough to leave that behind,” said the hooker when his Exeter exit was confirmed earlier in the year. “I still think I have lots more to give, and hopefully I get more opportunities between now and the move.

“We’ve got the Six Nations coming up, then the World Cup, and I want to be involved in both.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The only way I can do that, however, is by playing well at club level. That is my aim, and we will see what happens in the future.

“I have been at the Chiefs for 12 years, and it is all I’ve known.

“That said, this opportunity came up and it was one that I had to think long and hard about. I spoke a lot with my family about it, and it wasn’t an easy decision to make in the end.

“Obviously, it is a different competition, a different language – which I will have to learn – but I think it is time for a change.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Hopefully, I’ve still got plenty of years left in my career, but this is an opportunity for me to go over there and show what I am all about.”

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
j
jan 604 days ago

Originally it was neck, neck again for being a tw.t and not turning up. Bad manners..

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

146 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search