Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Crazy scenes in France as La Rochelle coach O'Gara involved with sideline player scuffle

(Source/Canal+)

A bizarre incident in the Top 14 clash between Clermont and La Rochelle has grabbed headlines after former Irish international and La Rochelle head coach Ronan O’Gara was attacked by an opposition player.

ADVERTISEMENT

O’Gara, who often patrols the sidelines for his side’s games, was shoved aggressively twice by flyhalf Benjamin Urdapilleta after a kick sailed past into touch.

Urdapilleta had been trying to field the kick for a quick lineout whilst O’Gara was caught in the line of ball and could not escape the collision which was outside the field of play.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

The Clermont flyhalf took exception to O’Gara’s involvement and shoved the former flyhalf twice in the back, much to O’Gara’s surprise. The former Irish international was stunned but did not retaliate.

The Argetininian was penalised for the incident by the referee after a scuffle broke out between the sides.

Urdapilleta doubled down after the match speaking with Canal+ claiming that O’Gara’s blocking was intentional.

“With the adrenaline, I sometimes have a few excesses,” he said.

“He’s smart, I think he did it on purpose to prevent me to receive the ball.

“At the time of the action, we were behind in the score so it was complicated.

ADVERTISEMENT

“But it’s sport, it can happen. Once the match is over, you forget.”

Urdapilleta ended up with the final say, kicking a penalty that gave Clermont enough of a cushion to hold a 11-10 win.

Clermont head coach Christophe Urios, who got into an altercation with O’Gara on the sidelines during his time with Bordeaux, laughed off the incident with his post-match assessment.

“I was not afraid of the consequences for Benjamin. Ronan O’Gara had only to remove himself (laughs). What do you want me to tell you? There is nothing wicked,” he said.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

6 Comments
T
TCO 475 days ago

He moved away slowly on purpose. O Gara has a reputation and that background makes this more obvious. Anyway, Urdapilleta shouldn’t have pushed him afterwards, now he looks bad. Better if he had just jumped for the ball

D
David 475 days ago

Lol, O'Gara has definitely done that deliberately. You can see him watching the ball and staying exactly where he is.

R
Rob 475 days ago

You can see it how he probably saw it in the heat of the moment that the slow walk doesn’t look good but way too big an overreaction, citing commission really needs to get in and sort this out, can’t allow people get away with that

K
KiwiSteve 475 days ago

Looks innocent enough by O'Gara, he's two metres from touch and walks away as it falls. You can't have players attacking people off field. The citing committee should come down hard. Players are supposed to set a good example for children and grass roots rugby. Don't nip it in the bud it will invade the game.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 51 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search