Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The unfair criticism being levelled at a rising star of South African rugby

(Photo by Shaun Botterill/Getty Images)

Stormers head coach John Dobson believes some of the criticism levelled at Damian Willemse is unfair – reports Warren Fortune for Rugby 365. 

ADVERTISEMENT

The 21-year-old was given the flyhalf responsibilities this season, but he failed to live up to expectations with several inconsistent performances.

Willemse had the No.10 jersey for the first five games of his team’s Super Rugby campaign this year before he was moved to fullback for their match against the Sharks – ahead of Super Rugby’s COVID-19-enforced suspension.

His last game at flyhalf before the move back to fullback was a shocker against the Blues, when the Stormers were outplayed and lost 14-33 at Newlands.

There has been a lot of debate about whether Willemse is flyhalf or fullback and it was a question that came up again in a video conference with the Stormers coach.

“What people are seeing with Damian, and by his own admission, is some poor kicks to touch and that is now equating to a bad game,” said Dobson.

“I chatted to two guys who have coached at international level and they think he is pretty solid [at flyhalf].

ADVERTISEMENT

“I think where we made an error is when he returns counter-attacks. He is often on the ground and that puts us under pressure after we return the kick and with the amount of kicking in Super Rugby it is a problem for us.”

Despite his performances at No.10, Dobson is not ready to throw in the towel.

“I have spoken to Damian directly about where he wants to play and he doesn’t mind and I have spoken to the national coach.

“He will still be in the frame at flyhalf when we resume.”

LIFE IN LOCKDOWN

Meanwhile, the Stormers squad are spending their lockdown working hard to improve physically, technically and mentally through a highly-specialised remote training programme.

Dobson said that the players are responding well to the programme that has been put in place, doing everything they can to improve while in lockdown.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We tailored individual programmes, but we had to bear in mind their environment. A guy like Johan du Toit is on a farm and somebody can throw a ball to him, it is obviously different to Chris van Zyl, who is the only guy in the squad living by himself.

“There is the fitness stuff, which is daily reporting, they have each got their own work-ons in terms of their technical skills. Then each coach is sending out video drills and then each player has to send that drill back on video.

“They have also got technical projects like analysing our game and the opposition teams, trends in world rugby.

“Then lastly a bit of fun, they are divided into groups and each group is competing with each other for things like post of the day or fitness drill of the day.”

Rugby 365

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes
Search