Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Crusaders game plan revealed - Secrets of the 2-4-2

The Crusaders 2-4-2

The Crusaders just seem to do the little things better than any team, but it’s the continual innovation that keeps the side in title contention year after year.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Crusaders pioneered the 2-4-2 system as a pattern of play and continue to deploy it, despite most teams in New Zealand using versions of the 1-3-3-1. In their quest to go back-to-back, the side is top of the table after 12 rounds proving that if it ain’t broke don’t fix it.

But why do they do things differently to all the Kiwi teams?

The key differences between the systems include wider ball movement and irregular fusion of positions, requiring players with more diverse skill sets.

The Crusaders will play to the edge more frequently to attack space, relying on a highly skilled team from 1-15 with catch-pass skills to effectively take apart the opposition.

The differences are subtle and play out over multiple phases. 1-3-3-1 teams play a lot more direct off 9 and as a result tend to have lower passes per phase, where the 2-4-2 requires more involvement from a first receiver as an intermediary, which increases the number of passes per phase and stretches play wider.

It may take the Hurricanes on average three phases to reach the opposite touchline whereas it can take the Crusaders two phases when they are in the pattern. The Crusaders operate with one pod instead of two. That small difference results in width being achieved 33% faster, creating a more expansive game, fewer rucks and more touches for each player.

The last point cannot be understated in value – more touches for each player. More involvement in the attack adds enjoyment and satisfaction to the game. How many teams will trust their Locks to catch-pass with a three on two on the edge? Scott Barrett and Sam Whitelock often find themselves in this very situation.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 1-3-3-1 theorizes that your two most athletic forwards (usually a hooker or loose forward) flank the edges for mismatched running opportunities. The rest of your pack is tasked with tough one-off carries in close and (generally in the case of Locks) cleaning out. What is more enjoyable, cleaning out rucks all day or being involved out wide with your hands on the ball? Being a direct part of the ball movement can give players a sense of inclusion.

There is potentially more shared satisfaction for successful play with the Crusaders, helping build a strong team culture and level of enjoyment within the team. While the main reason they Crusaders use this system will be the game speed it can generate, they benefit in intangible ways with more team involvement.

Dan Carter talks about the Crusaders culture: 

Video Spacer

Fluidity

It must be noted that it can take time to fall back into the 2-4-2 structure – set pieces congregate all the forwards in one spot making it difficult to move straight back into the pattern. The Crusaders tend to run plays from set piece that reset structure over 3-4 phases, instead of strike plays looking for a quick score. They may use forwards coming around the corner multiple times to naturally spread the team out or 5-man lineout packages to assist getting forwards wide.

Phase play coming off set piece might seem basic nature but after a few phases going the same way, the side is prepared to hit you with width and fast.

ADVERTISEMENT

Width by Design

When the Crusaders have stretched an opposition to the 15m tramlines close to the sideline, you will generally see two formations.

The first 2-4-2 formation is a pod of three directly off the ruck with a backdoor receiving option. The fourth forward in the middle is usually a little deeper and can provide a decoy line on the first or second phase if required.

If the pod carries on the first phase, 10 and 12 slide the same way and then on the next play run a screen pass utilising the fourth forward as a decoy to push the ball to the edge.

With two additional forward runners stationed wide, the Crusaders can attack wide without the threat of losing the ball with an ineffective backs cleanout. They are able to get to the ball to opposite side of the field within 2 phases.

The second formation in the 2-4-2 is having one of the first receiving backs (Mo’unga, Goodhue or Crotty), act as the intermediary between the ruck and the pod of three, enabling them to remain central.

Jack Goodue (13) jumps into first receiver.

 

 

A standard Crusaders set up with the first five, Mitch Hunt (10), linking the wide ruck with the central pod.

The roles of 10, 12, 13 are interchangeable and each player has the skills to perform it.

In both 2-4-2 situations, the Crusaders can use a swivel pass from the pod to release the ball to the edge all in one phase. The fourth middle forward becomes a decoy again and the screen pass is used to get the ball wide.

The lead runner in the pod will use the backdoor option to Mo’unga (10), while Scott Barrett the fourth forward will run a decoy line freeing up Goodhue (13).

 

This time, Richie Mo’unga is the link man, but the same play is used.
Goodhue receives back door from the pod, and the fourth forward will run a decoy line for him.
Goodhue fires out the back to Havili behind the decoy.

The fourth middle forward is the key to limiting the Crusaders 2-4-2 width. In almost all the instances he is a ‘dead’ runner, that is, not really an option to receive. He is the most isolated man in the Crusaders system, especially if the first pod takes a hit up. They don’t really want to give him the ball – the forwards from the first pod would still on the ground and the edge forwards are too far away to help.

Pressuring the backdoor option and forcing the Crusaders to use the fourth middle forward can stop the ball getting to the edges, and put them in a vulnerable situation with the surrounding backs required to secure the ruck, opening up the opportunity to win a turnover.

System Requirements

The Crusaders need certain players to fit their system, which means their requirements are a bit different than everyone else. This explains why players like Jack Goodhue are successful with them but he may not be if he was with the Blues. It’s not that he would be any worse of a player, just in the Blues structure he wouldn’t get the chance to flourish.

Goodhue is one of three primary first receiving options, giving him responsibilities he would never have with other teams at centre. Richie Mo’unga, Ryan Crotty and Jack Goodhue are interchangeable cogs that float around using their passing skills to keep the 2-4-2 machine moving.

Mo’unga takes the lion share of first receiving duties but he has the freedom to take the line on if he wants to, with Crotty and Goodhue available to take over if he is caught at the bottom of the ruck.

Video Spacer

The edge forwards can again interchange, but runners like Matt Todd, Pete Samu, Codie Taylor will often find themselves flanked on the edge. The tight five generally provide the grunt work in the middle, with Number 8 Jordan Taufua being a primary ball carrier that can run the swivel pass. Locks Scott Barrett and Sam Whitelock can find themselves running in the wider channels at times, the pack works together to manage loads.

Ben Lam is grabbing all the headlines with a blistering 12 tries on the left edge, but Crusaders wings Manasa Mataele and George Bridge sit unassumingly in third and forth on the try-scoring list with eight and seven tries respectively. There is no better place to be a winger than the Crusaders.

This is a proven system that shows no signs of slowing. With a host of key New Zealand derbies at home in the closing stages of the regular season, don’t be surprised to see the Crusaders top the table once again.

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Boks Office | Episode 39 | The Investec Champions Cup is back

Argentina v France | HSBC SVNS Hong Kong 2025 | Men's Match Highlights

New Zealand v Australia | HSBC SVNS Hong Kong 2025 | Women's Match Highlights

Tokyo Sungoliath vs Shizuoka BlueRevs | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Reds vs Force | Super Rugby W 2025 | Full Match Replay

The Rise of Kenya | The Report

New Zealand in Hong Kong | Brady Rush | Sevens Wonders | Episode 4

The Fixture: How This Rugby Rivalry Has Lasted 59 Years

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

I
IkeaBoy 57 minutes ago
Why Les Kiss and Stuart Lancaster can lead Australia to glory

“Why are you so insistent on being wrong? Man United won in 2008 (beating Chelsea in the final). In 2009 Barcelona won, beating United.”

Good lad, just checking. So you’re not a bot! Chelsea bombed the 2008 final more than United won it. John Terry… couldn’t happen to a nicer fella.


“The gap between wins ignores the finals contested. 2 in 2 years with his City Triumph. The most recent put him in the elite company of managers to have won it with multiple clubs. Yet more late career success and history.”

Again - you’re not correct. City won the CL in 2023, and made the final in 2021. Those are the only two CL finals they have made.”

So the difference between 2021 and 2023 would of course be TWO YEARS. 24 months would account for 3 different seasons. They contested ECL finals twice in two years. The first in 2021 - which they lost - was still the first elite European final in the clubs then 141 year history. Explain clearly how that’s not an achievement? Guess what age he was then…


“I think your take on Gatland is pretty silly. Gatland was without Edwards in the 2013 and 2017 Lions tours and managed to do alright.”

I thought you don’t care what certain managers did 10 years ago…

Why would I address Eddie Jones? Why would he be deserving of a single sentence?


“I am aware Les Kiss has achieved great things in his career, but I don’t care what he did over ten years ago. Rugby was a different sport back then.”

So you haven’t watched even a minute of Super Rugby this year?


“lol u really need to chill out”

Simply frightful! If you’re not a bot you’re at least Gen-Z?

171 Go to comments
f
fl 1 hour ago
Why Les Kiss and Stuart Lancaster can lead Australia to glory

“Pep didn’t win the ECL in 2009. It was 2008 with Barca”

Why are you so insistent on being wrong? Man United won in 2008 (beating Chelsea in the final). In 2009 Barcelona won, beating United.


“The gap between wins ignores the finals contested. 2 in 2 years with his City Triumph. The most recent put him in the elite company of managers to have won it with multiple clubs. Yet more late career success and history.”

Again - you’re not correct. City won the CL in 2023, and made the final in 2021. Those are the only two CL finals they have made. With Barcelona, Pep made the semi final four consecutive times - with City he’s managed only 3 in 8 years. This year they didn’t even make the round of 16.


To re-cap, you wrote that Pep “has gotten better with age. By every measure.” There are some measures that support what you’re saying, but the vast majority of the measures that you have highlighted actually show the opposite.


I am aware Les Kiss has achieved great things in his career, but I don’t care what he did over ten years ago. Rugby was a different sport back then.


I think your take on Gatland is pretty silly. Gatland was without Edwards in the 2013 and 2017 Lions tours and managed to do alright. You’ve also not addressed Eddie Jones.


I agree wrt Schmidt. He would ideally be retained, but it wouldn’t work to have a remote head coach. He should definitely be hired as a consultant/analyst/selector though.


“Look at the talent that would be discarded in Schmidt and Kiss if your age Nazism was applied.”

lol u really need to chill out lad. Kiss and Schmidt would both be great members of the coaching set up in 2025, but it would be ridiculous to bank on either to retain the head coach role until 2031.

171 Go to comments
I
IkeaBoy 2 hours ago
Why Les Kiss and Stuart Lancaster can lead Australia to glory

Pep didn’t win the ECL in 2009. It was 2008 with Barca. The gap between wins ignores the finals contested. 2 in 2 years with his City Triumph. The most recent put him in the elite company of managers to have won it with multiple clubs. Yet more late career success and history.


His time with City - a lower win ratio compared to Bayern Munich as you say - includes a 100 PT season. A feat that will likely never be surpassed. I appreciate you don’t follow soccer too closely but even casual fans refer to the sport in ‘pre and post Pep’ terms and all because of what he has achieved and is continuing to achieve, late career. There is a reason that even U10’s play out from the back now at every level of the game. That’s also a fairly recent development.


How refreshing to return to rugby on a rugby forum.


Ireland won a long over due slam in 2009. The last embers of a golden generation was kicked on by a handful of young new players and a new senior coach. Kiss was brought in as defence coach and was the reason they won it. They’d the best defence in the game at the time. He all but invented the choke tackle. Fittingly they backed it up in the next world cup in their 2011 pool match against… Australia. The instantly iconic image of Will Genia getting rag-dolled by Stephen Ferris.


His career since has even included director of rugby positions. He would have an extremely good idea of where the game is at and where it is going in addition to governance experience and dealings. Not least in Oz were many of the players will have come via or across Rugby League pathways.


Gatland isn’t a valid coach to compare too. He only ever over-achieved and was barely schools level without Shaun Edwards at club or test level. His return to Wales simply exposed his limitations and a chaotic union. It wasn’t age.


Schmidt is open to staying involved in a remote capacity which I think deserves more attention. It would be a brain drain to lose him. He stepped in to coach the ABs in the first 2022 test against Ireland when Foster was laid out with Covid. They mullered Ireland 42-19. He was still heavily involved in the RWC 2023 quarter final. Same story.


Look at the talent that would be discarded in Schmidt and Kiss if your age Nazism was applied.

171 Go to comments
f
fl 3 hours ago
Why Les Kiss and Stuart Lancaster can lead Australia to glory

“He won a ECL and a domestic treble at the beginning of his career.”

He won 2 ECLs at the beginning of his career (2009, 2011). Since then he’s won 1 in 15 years.


“He then won 3 leagues on the bounce later in his career”

He won 3 leagues on the bounce at the start of his career too - (2009, 2010, 2011).


If we’re judging him by champions league wins, he peaked in his late 30s, early 40s. If we’re judging him by domestic titles he’s stayed pretty consistent over his career. If we’re judging him by overall win rate he peaked at Bayern, and was better at Barcelona than at City. So no, he hasn’t gotten better by every measure.


“You mentioned coaches were older around the mid-2010’s compared to the mid-2000’s. Robson was well above the average age you’ve given for those periods even in the 90’s when in his pomp.”

Robson was 63-64 when he was at Barcelona, so he wasn’t very old. But yeah, he was slightly above the average age of 60 I gave for the top 4 premier league coaches in 2015, and quite a bit above the averages for 2005 and 2025.


“Also, comparing coaches - and their experiences, achievements - at different ages is unstable. It’s not a valid way to compare and tends to torpedo your own logic when you do compare them on equal terms. I can see why you don’t like doing it.”

Well my logic certainly hasn’t been torpedoed. Currently the most successful premier league coaches right now are younger than they were ten years ago. You can throw all the nuance at it that you want, but that fact won’t change. It’s not even clear what comparing managers “on equal terms” would even mean, or why it would be relevant to anything I’ve said.


“You still haven’t answered why Kiss could be a risker appointment?”

Because I’ve been talking to you about football managers. If you want to change the subject then great - I care a lot more about rugby than I do football.

But wrt Kiss, I don’t agree that 25 years experience is actually that useful, given what a different sport rugby was 25 years ago. Obviously in theory more experience can never be a bad thing, but I think 10 years of coaching experience is actually more than enough these days. Erasmus had been a coach for 13 years when he got the SA top job. Andy Farrell had been a coach for 9 when he got the Ireland job. I don’t think anyone would say that either of them were lacking in experience.


Now - what about coaches who do have 25+ years experience? The clearest example of that would be Eddie Jones, who started coaching 31 years ago. He did pretty well everywhere he worked until around 2021 (when he was 61), when results with England hit a sharp decline. He similarly oversaw a terrible run with Australia, and currently isn’t doing a great job with Japan.

Another example is Warren Gatland, who also started coaching full-time 31 years ago, after 5 years as a player-coach. Gatland did pretty well everywhere he went until 2020 (when he was 56), when he did a relatively poor job with the Chiefs, before doing a pretty poor job with the Lions, and then overseeing a genuine disaster with Wales. There are very few other examples, as most coaches retire or step back into lesser roles when they enter their 60s. Mick Byrne actually has 34 years experience in coaching (but only 23 years coaching in rugby) and at 66 he’s the oldest coach of a top 10 side, and he’s actually doing really well. He goes to show that you can continue to be a good coach well into your 60s, but he seems like an outlier.


So the point is - right now, Les Kiss looks like a pretty reliable option, but 5 years ago so did Eddie Jones and Warren Gatland before they went on to prove that coaches often decline as they get older. If Australia want Kiss as a short term appointment to take over after Schmidt leaves in the summer, I don’t think that would be a terrible idea - but NB wanted Kiss as a long term appointment starting in 2027! That’s a massive risk, given the chance that his aptitude will begin to decline.


Its kind of analagous to how players decline. We know (for example) that a fly-half can still be world class at 38, but we also know that most fly-halves peak in their mid-to-late 20s, so it is generally considered a risk to build your game plan around someone much older than that.

171 Go to comments
A
AlanCriner 3 hours ago
Ian Foster address injury rumours to key All Black before World Cup final

My name is Alan Criner, and I'm a resident of Toronto, CA. I'm a 45-year-old financial analyst who has always been cautious with my investments. However, in my quest to diversify my portfolio, I fell prey to a devastating fake crypto investment scam, losing 125,000 Canadian dollars' worth of Bitcoin. This traumatic experience sent my life into a downward spiral, leaving me depressed and feeling hopeless.

Despite my repeated attempts to contact the account manager who initially approached me on Telegram, I was met with silence. They refused to provide any explanation or information, and I was locked out of my account on their website. The authorities were unable to assist me, as the scammers were untraceable.

Just when I thought all was lost, my nephew, a Canadian government lawyer, introduced me to Morphohack Cyber Service, a reputable private investigator and crypto recovery company. I visited their website (www . morphohackcyber . com) and, after mustering the courage, contacted them. They listened attentively as I recounted my ordeal and educated me on the scam, revealing that numerous others had fallen victim to the same scheme.

Although skeptical at first, I decided to take a chance. Morphohack guided me through the process, instructing me to set up a new wallet. To my astonishment, they successfully recovered my stolen Bitcoin and transferred it to my new wallet. I was stunned, struggling to comprehend how this was possible.

I initially wanted to keep this experience private, but I realized that there may be others out there who have suffered similar losses. If you're a victim of crypto theft, I urge you to reach out to Morphohack Cyber Service. They can be contacted through their website or email. (Morphohack@cyberservices . com, Info@morphohackcyber . com) Don't give up hope, there is a way to recover your stolen crypto assets.

29 Go to comments
A
AlanCriner 4 hours ago
Exeter look to Charlie Chapman to boost scrum-half options

My name is Alan Criner, and I'm a resident of Toronto, CA. I'm a 45-year-old financial analyst who has always been cautious with my investments. However, in my quest to diversify my portfolio, I fell prey to a devastating fake crypto investment scam, losing 125,000 Canadian dollars' worth of Bitcoin. This traumatic experience sent my life into a downward spiral, leaving me depressed and feeling hopeless.

Despite my repeated attempts to contact the account manager who initially approached me on Telegram, I was met with silence. They refused to provide any explanation or information, and I was locked out of my account on their website. The authorities were unable to assist me, as the scammers were untraceable.

Just when I thought all was lost, my nephew, a Canadian government lawyer, introduced me to Morphohack Cyber Service, a reputable private investigator and crypto recovery company. I visited their website (www . morphohackcyber . com) and, after mustering the courage, contacted them. They listened attentively as I recounted my ordeal and educated me on the scam, revealing that numerous others had fallen victim to the same scheme.

Although skeptical at first, I decided to take a chance. Morphohack guided me through the process, instructing me to set up a new wallet. To my astonishment, they successfully recovered my stolen Bitcoin and transferred it to my new wallet. I was stunned, struggling to comprehend how this was possible.

I initially wanted to keep this experience private, but I realized that there may be others out there who have suffered similar losses. If you're a victim of crypto theft, I urge you to reach out to Morphohack Cyber Service. They can be contacted through their website or email. (Morphohack@cyberservices . com, Info@morphohackcyber . com) Don't give up hope, there is a way to recover your stolen crypto assets.

0 Go to comments
T
Theresa Wright 4 hours ago
Six Nations: 5 things we've learned from half-way point weekend

Have always had trust issues with my boyfriend but to clear my doubt I had to hire verifiedprohackers@gmail.com to help monitor all activities done on my boyfriend phone just to be sure his not cheating because am tired of always stalking him when ever he doesn’t pick my calls or has a call and refuses to pick his calls I tend to feel his seeing  another woman so in other to make things easy for me verifiedprohackers@gmail.com gave me the best phone hack with no trace and now I feel satisfied. Thank you so much verifiedprohackers@gmail.com

5 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Why NZR's Ineos settlement may be the most important victory they'll enjoy this year Why NZR's Ineos settlement may be the most important victory they'll enjoy this year
Search