Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Crusaders issue update on David Havili injury following emergency surgery

(Photo by Michael Bradley/Getty Images)

The Crusaders have issued an update on David Havili’s injury situation after the utility back underwent emergency surgery on his abdominal on Friday.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 25-year-old was absent from his side’s 24-20 victory over the Reds in Christchurch three days ago as the Crusaders announced on Sunday that he went under the knife after “experiencing some discomfort”.

In another brief statement released on Monday, the Crusaders said that Havili had a “serious infection of his bowel” which caused the urgent surgery, and that the utility back “is recovering well but will not be available for several weeks”.

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

“As this is a non rugby-related issue, the Crusaders won’t be commenting further, and a return to play timeframe will be advised at a later date,” the statement concluded.

The injury blow is a significant one for both Havili and the Crusaders.

Havili has been one of the form players in Super Rugby so far this season, having impressed for the back-to-back-to-back reigning champions mainly from fullback, but also at first-five.

Statistically speaking, he has made the most offloads (14) in the competition to date, while also accumulating an impressive 258 running metres, six clean breaks and beaten 14 defenders in just four matches.

https://www.instagram.com/p/B8mys_kA7SK/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

ADVERTISEMENT

Without Havili, the Crusaders will be without one of their key attacking figures for an undisclosed yet lengthy period.

On a personal level, the injury is an untimely one for the three-test All Black, who can also play in the midfield and is looking to regain his place in the national side after having made his last appearance at test level in 2017.

The departures of Ryan Crotty, Sonny Bill Williams and Ben Smith have opened some berths in the All Blacks squad for some fresh faces, and Havili’s early season exploits made him a top candidate to fill one of those voids.

However, his selection chances may be cast in doubt thanks to this bowel infection, although there remains hope that he could return before the end of the campaign to play his way back into national contention.

ADVERTISEMENT

In Havili’s absence, the Crusaders can call upon promising youngster Will Jordan to plug the gap at fullback, but a niggling groin injury has seen him sidelined in recent weeks.

Nine-test George Bridge played well in the No. 15 jersey during the Crusaders’ win over the Reds and may be utilised there until Jordan or Havili become match fit, although All Blacks rest weeks could alter his availability status.

The fourth-placed Crusaders will continue their quest to secure a fourth successive Super Rugby crown this weekend when they travel to Brisbane to take on the Sunwolves at Suncorp Stadium.

In other news:

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave? Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?
Search