Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Crusaders ‘let ourselves down’ in heartbreaking loss to Brumbies

Crusaders players talk in a huddle during the round 13 Super Rugby Pacific match between ACT Brumbies and Crusaders at GIO Stadium, on May 18, 2024, in Canberra, Australia. (Photo by Mark Metcalfe/Getty Images)

Captain Codie Taylor believes the Crusaders “let ourselves down” as the defending champions fell to the Brumbies 31-24 in a defeat that now sees them stand on the brink of elimination.

ADVERTISEMENT

Former All Blacks fullback Mils Muliaina boldly suggested the Crusaders were the “one team” that could go to Canberra and upset the Brumbies ahead of the blockbuster round 13 fixture.

The Crusaders were second-last on the Super Rugby Pacific ladder before their trip across the Tasman. While the visitors needed to win, the Brumbies were in a similar boat as they continued to chase a top-two finish.

This clash was all set to be an epic tussle of desperation.

Related

With time all but up on the clock, and the scores locked at 24-all, Brumbies flyhalf Noah Lolesio missed what would’ve been a match-winning shot at goal but the drama was far from over.

Crusaders lock Quinten Strange batted the ball dead which saw referee Ben O’Keeffe award a penalty try to the Brumbies and a yellow card against the second-rower. In one of the most incredibly stunning finishes to any rugby game ever, that’s how the Brumbies won.

“We gave ourselves a crack,” Codie Taylor said on Stan Sport post-game.

“The first half, again, we created a lot of opportunities. We probably just let ourselves down, individual errors across the board – myself included – and it cost us.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We let in 12 points there, pretty easy tries for them on turnover attack and it’s just not good enough. Tough way to finish.”

Poor discipline and uncharacteristic mistakes has been the Crusaders’ Achilles heel all season and it cost them in this match too. The New Zealanders leaked two tries in as many minutes early on with outside back Andy Muirhead and Tom Wright scoring.

Match Summary

0
Penalty Goals
1
5
Tries
3
2
Conversions
3
0
Drop Goals
0
85
Carries
106
7
Line Breaks
9
6
Turnovers Lost
15
2
Turnovers Won
3

It almost looked as if the Brumbies had the potential to run away with it, or at least they threatened to, but the Crusaders stayed in the fight on the back of their dominance up front at the set-piece.

Fletcher Newell was especially impressive as the visitors won a series of scrum penalties. The Crusaders refused to go away and ended up scoring 10 unanswered points late to almost send it to extra time.

ADVERTISEMENT

But the Crusaders’ season of hardship and misery continued in Canberra. Strange knocked the ball dead, and while there was still time for a restart at GIO Stadium, Noah Lolesio confidently punted the ball into the crowd to secure the win.

“I’m proud of the boys. We knew we had to turn up physically and put these big men on the deck and I felt like we did that for most of the time,” Taylor explained.

“It was just probably when we had the ball, again, created a lot of opportunities, just let some slip.

“The Brumbies are a class team. They put you under pressure and that’s (what they did).

“The fans are always there,” he added. “That’s the great thing about the Crusaders fans.

“We feel their support, we’re really trying out there but just can’t quite string it together but there’s a lot of effort going in.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 1 hour ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Set pieces are important and the way teams use them is a great indication of how they play the game. No team is showcasing their revolution more than the Springboks. This year they have mauled less and primarily in the attacking third. Otherwise they have tended to set like they are going to maul and then play around the corner or shove the ball out the back. They arent also hitting the crash ball carrier constantly but instead they are choosing to use their width or a big carrying forward in wider areas. While their maul is varied the scrum is still a blunt instrument winning penalties before the backs have a go. Some teams have chosen to blunt their set piece game for more control. The All Blacks are kicking more penalties and are using their powerful scrum as an attacking tool choosing that set piece as an attacking weapon. Their willingness to maul more and in different positions is also becoming more prominent. The French continue to play conservative rugby off the set piece using their big bruisers frequently. The set piece is used differently by different teams. Different teams play different ways and can be successful regardless. They can win games with little territory and possession or smash teams with plenty of both. The game of rugby is for all types and sizes and thats true in the modern era. I hope that administrators keep it that way and dont go further towards a Rugby League style situation. Some administrators are of the opinion that rugby is too slow and needs to be sped up. Why not rather empower teams to choose how they want to play and create a framework that favours neither size nor agility. That favours neither slow tempo play or rock n roll rugby. Create a game that favour both and challenge teams to execute their plans. If World Rugby can create a game like that then it will be the ultimate winner.

35 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
'Let's not sugarcoat it': Former All Black's urgent call to protect eligibility rules

Yep, no one knows what will happen. Thing is I think (this is me arguing a point here not a random debate with this one) they're better off trialing it now in a controlled environment than waiting to open it up in a knee jerk style reaction to a crumbling organtization and team. They can always stop it again.


The principle idea is that why would players leave just because the door is ajar?


BBBR decides to go but is not good enough to retain the jersey after doing it. NZ no longer need to do what I suggest by paying him to get back upto speed. That is solely a concept of a body that needs to do what I call pick and stick wth players. NZR can't hold onto everyone so they have to choose their BBBRs and if that player comes back from a sabbatical under par it's a priority to get him upto speed as fast as possible because half of his competition has been let go overseas because they can't hold onto them all. Changing eligibility removes that dilemma, if a BBBR isn't playing well you can be assured that someone else is (well the idea is that you can be more assured than if you only selected from domestic players).


So if someone decides they want to go overseas, they better do it with an org than is going to help improve them, otherwise theyre still basically as ineligible as if they would have been scorning a NZ Super side that would have given them the best chance to be an All Black.

147 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Kieran Read names his 2025 British and Irish Lions captain Kieran Read names his 2025 British and Irish Lions captain
Search