Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Crusaders loss a 'backwards step' for Chiefs

Sam Cane. (Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images)

Warren Gatland and Sam Cane were in agreement following the Chiefs’ match with the Crusaders that the 34-19 defeat was a ‘backwards step’ for a team that many had considered Super Rugby Pacific front-runners after their late-game heroics in Christchurch just two weekends ago.

ADVERTISEMENT

Although any loss is disappointing, Cane and Gatland noted that it was the nature of the defeat that will sting the most, with previous strengths of the Chiefs falling to the wayside in Hamilton.

One two-point loss to the Blues aside, the Chiefs had started their season looking in fine form, suffocating the Highlanders in Queenstown, pipping the Crusaders at the final moment in Christchurch and putting nine tries on Moana Pasifika in South Auckland last weekend. What had worked so well for them in those victories, however, was frustratingly absent in their rematch with the Crusaders.

Video Spacer

How Super Rugby Aupiki can change rugby in New Zealand for the better.

Video Spacer

How Super Rugby Aupiki can change rugby in New Zealand for the better.

“It felt like we’d been building really nicely, slowly making improvements, but then today we just got beaten to the punch in lots of different little areas,” co-captain Cane said following the game.

“I thought they dominated the aerial space and the kick battle. They won the majority of the collisions and the breakdown as well.

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by RugbyPass (@rugbypass)

“I know that we fought back and gave ourselves a chance but if we’re gonna be serious contenders this season, we can’t get beaten in those sort of areas.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Outside backs Kaleb Trask, Shaun Stevenson and Etene Nanai-Seturo all came off second-best under the high ball compared to their opposition while first five Bryn Gatland and midfielder Quinn Tupaea both also shelled catches.

Meanwhile on the ground, Crusaders flanker Tom Christie and fullback Will Jordan both forced three breakdown turnovers each, snuffing out many a Chiefs attack and preventing the home side from building much in the way of momentum. While the Chiefs looked dangerous when they managed to string a few phases together, they finished the game with just 46 per cent possession and a lowly 91 per cent success rate at their own breakdowns.

In their prior victory over the Crusaders, it was the Chiefs who had come out on top in those particular areas of the game – but it wasn’t to be in Hamilton.

“It’s disappointing to lose but then it’s disappointing there were facets of our game we didn’t get right,” said Cane. “Our carry-and-clean game had become a real strength of ours recently and that was an area that let us down tonight. The fact that we didn’t get parts of our game that we can control right is equally disappointing.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

Gatland – stepping in as the match-day coach with Clayton McMillan invalided due to Covid – had a nearly identical take on where things fell apart for the Chiefs.

“[The Crusaders] dominated the breakdown area and the aerial battle and those were the two areas where we couldn’t get a foothold into the game and that was probably the difference between the two sides,” he said.

“I thought we looked really strong when we kept the ball … and we were able to score points but we weren’t able to do that for long enough and they did put a lot of pressure on us at the breakdown and made it tough for us. We kind of got our pants pulled down in that area and we’ll have to go away [and look at it].

“We feel like as a side we’ve been tracking really well, improving week to week and today was probably a little bit of a backwards step. We’ll need to take stock of that and probably focus on those two areas particularly, the breakdown and the aerial battle.”

Despite the loss, there’s still plenty of water to flow under the bridge in the 2022 season and with an eight-team finals series scheduled to kick off in May, the Chiefs will be confident they can get another shot at the Crusaders later in the year if they can right the wrongs from Saturday night’s fixture.

“We’ll take plenty from it and hopefully get those things right,” Cane said. “Maybe we see them down the track again at some point.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
A
Andrew 1001 days ago

  1. Gatland was in charge...2. If the Saders are the source of most ABs who were found wanting in the nightmare tour last November are still better than the Chiefs, we are in more trouble internationally. There were more than one or two in that Chiefs side who could have made a ruthless statement towards the revamping of the test side....and didnt.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 30 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

152 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

152 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion' 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion'
Search