Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Crusaders player ratings vs Chiefs | Super Rugby Pacific

(Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images)

The Crusaders have bounced back from their first loss of the season to beat the Chiefs in their rematch in Hamilton, prevailing in a 34-19 Super Rugby Pacific win at FMG Stadium Waikato.

ADVERTISEMENT

Here’s how they rated:

1. Finlay Brewis – 6

Quiet shift for the big man, who scrummaged well but wasn’t overly active on either side of the ball. Off in the 46th minute.

2. Codie Taylor – 7.5

Carried often and distributed well. Didn’t go wrong with his lineout throwing and was busy on defence, winning a turnover for the Crusaders. Racked up 13 tackles and capped his impressive performance, which lasted for the whole 80 minutes, with a well-deserved try.

3. Oli Jager – 6

Impressed with his carrying in the loose. Eight tackles from eight attempts and anchored the scrum well. Off in the 55th minute.

4. Scott Barrett (c) – 7

A strong showing at the set piece was counter-balanced by, for the most part, some good ball-handling skills. Won most of his side’s lineout ball and won all 12 of his tackles without fail.

5. Quinten Strange – 6

Acquitted himself well. Won lineout ball for his side and got his mitts on the ball on occasion. A great back-up to have for Sam Whitelock.

6. Ethan Blackadder – 7

A big shift on defence with 12 tackles. Was a pest for the opposition defence, constantly making himself a presence looking to thwart any attack they looked to instigate.

7. Tom Christie – 7.5

Another typically industrious performance by the Crusaders tearaway. Topped his side’s tackle count with 20 and was a nuisance at the breakdown, stealing four turnovers. Carried decently as well.

8. Cullen Grace – 7.5

Scored a well-worked try to open the scoring. Should have been rewarded with a try for great support play and handling skills to run in his second after scooping the ball up off his bootlaces, but it was scrubbed out due to Strange’s forward pass. Dangerous with ball in hand, which may be useful for his All Blacks aspirations.

Related

9. Bryn Hall – 6

Shaky box kick needlessly put the ball dead. Distributed crisply as always. Off in the 46th minute.

10. Richie Mo’unga – 7

Showed glimpses of his hot-stepping brilliance with ball in hand, showing his exceptional footwork to beat an array of Chiefs defenders.

11. George Bridge – 6

Coughed up the ball cold early in the second half. Ran up a heap of metres, finishing the match with 81 metres. Didn’t offer much in the way of attacking threat.

12. David Havili – 7

Did well to manipulate the Chiefs’ defensive line and set Will Jordan away for a try within the first 20 minutes. Was great in terms of distribution and had his tackle count enter the double digits, but disappointed himself with one kick that sailed out on the full. Still an admirable effort in his 100th match.

13. Leicester Fainga’anuku – 7

Plenty of power and strength to crash through a number of Chiefs defenders and dot down right by the posts. Offered plenty with ball in hand, although some defensive frailties led to three missed tackles. Off in the 76th minute.

14. Chay Fihaki – 4

Not the performance he would have been after. Needed to make a statement to push himself up an outside back pecking order that also features Jordan, Sevu Reece, George Bridge, Leicester Fainga’anuku and Braydon Ennor. Instead he only ran for three metres and missed three of his four tackle attempts. Off in the 46th minute.

15. Will Jordan – 8.5

Scored his obligatory try inside the opening quarter of the match. Chalked up a ton of running metres, as is normally the case, topping the count with a whopping 143 metres from 12 carries. Proved himself as a quality prospect at the breakdown as well, nabbing three turnovers. A quality player.

Video Spacer

How Super Rugby Aupiki can change women’s rugby in New Zealand for the better | Aotearoa Rugby Pod

Video Spacer

How Super Rugby Aupiki can change women’s rugby in New Zealand for the better | Aotearoa Rugby Pod

Related

Reserves

16. Fletcher Newell – N/A

17. George Bower – 6

On in the 46th minute. Brilliant work to strip the Chiefs of the ball in general play. Quite mobile for a prop.

18. Tamaiti Williams – 6

On in the 55th minute. A behemoth of a man who added size and power to his side’s pack, which was valuable at set piece time.

19. Mitchell Dunshea – N/A

On in the 52nd minute before departing again due to injury in the 69th minute.

20. Corey Kellow – NA

On in the 69th minute.

21. Mitchell Drummond – 6

On in the 46th minute. Added a lot of impetus with his fresh legs, to the benefit of the Crusaders.

22. Fergus Burke – NA

On in the 76th minute.

23. Sevu Reece – 8

On in the 46th minute. Provided plenty of spark off the bench. Wonderful finishing ability was enough to see him through for his 37th try as a Crusader, the third-most in franchise history. Continued to look threatening throughout. Should start next week.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The Waikato young gun solving one of rugby players' 'obvious problems' Injury breeds opportunity for Waikato entrepreneur
Search