Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Crusaders promote young lock as one of four changes to lineup for Blues clash

(Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images)

The Crusaders have tasked a young lock with a starting role for their blockbuster Good Friday clash against the Blues in Christchurch.

ADVERTISEMENT

Head coach Scott Robertson has made four changes to his starting lineup after the Crusaders edged the Hurricanes in a 24-21 Super Rugby Pacific victory at Sky Stadium in Wellington last weekend.

The most curious of those changes comes in the second row, where 20-year-old rookie lock Zach Gallagher earns a starting role alongside captain Scott Barrett, just two weeks after making his Super Rugby Pacific debut against the Highlanders.

Video Spacer

Why rolling maul tries aren’t as bad as they’re being made out to be | Aotearoa Rugby Pod

Video Spacer

Why rolling maul tries aren’t as bad as they’re being made out to be | Aotearoa Rugby Pod

Gallagher is promoted to the run-on side after last week’s starter Quinten Strange sustained a calf injury against the Hurricanes, which will leave him sidelined for several weeks.

Strange’s injury leaves the Crusaders short-changed at lock, with veteran Sam Whitelock unavailable due to a broken finger, while Mitchell Dunshea is out for the season with a damaged MCL.

As such, Gallagher has been entrusted with a starting role in the Crusaders’ biggest match of the season between New Zealand’s top two franchises, despite his vast inexperience.

The selection of Gallagher is one of two changes made in the forward pack, with the other coming in the front row, where Oli Jager returns from a thumb injury to take the place of the benched Fletcher Newell.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the backline, experienced halfback Bryn Hall starts ahead of Mitchell Drummond, who has dropped to the bench, while Leicester Fainga’anuku has been named on the left wing at the expense of All Blacks flyer George Bridge.

Bridge joins Newell, Drummond and rookie utility forward Dominic Gardiner as the newbies in the reserves.

Kick-off for Friday’s match is scheduled for 7:05pm NZT.

Crusaders team to play the Blues

1. Joe Moody
2. Codie Taylor (vc)
3. Oli Jager
4. Scott Barrett (c)
5. Zach Gallgher
6. Ethan Blackadder
7. Tom Christie
8. Cullen Grace
9. Bryn Hall
10. Richie Mo’unga
11. Leicester Fainga’anuku
12. David Havili (vc)
13. Braydon Ennor
14. Sevu Reece
15. Will Jordan

Reserves

16. Ricky Jackson
17. George Bower
18. Fletcher Newell
19. Dominic Gardiner
20. Pablo Matera
21. Mitchell Drummond
22. Fergus Burke
23. George Bridge

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC
Search