Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The curious case of Shane Christie

The curious case of Shane Christie

Another week, another player’s career ends due to concussion.

Tasman Mako and Highlander Shane Christie has announced his retirement from rugby due to ongoing concussion symptoms he has been plagued with for almost two years. Christie will be taking up a role with the Tasman team as an assistant coach.

ADVERTISEMENT

This is just another reminder that professional sport careers can be only fleeting – Christie is 32, relatively old for a rugby player but obviously incredibly young to be leaving his chosen career.

The question remains, what is life for these players going to be like after they leave rugby? When you’ve come to the natural end of your career it must be a far easier pill to swallow than someone who has spent the last 18 months trying to get back on the field, who has held out hope for the longest time that they might need only one more week of rest.

Many rugby players realise that they need to prepare for employment after their sporting career comes to an end and study various qualifications part-time while they’re still playing, but not everyone is in that position.

The most curious thing about Christie’s ailment is that for the longest time there was no information available to the public – a “mystery illness” kept being reported, but that begs the question of whether the people in charge were hiding what Christie was suffering from, or whether they genuinely did not know what the problem was.

The second possibility is scary enough, but it would be almost equally as concerning if Christie’s condition was being concealed – given that every other physical injury is discussed openly in the sport.

Regardless of why Christie’s inability to play was withheld for so long, the sheer number of players whose careers have ended in the last few years is frightening – especially when you compare it to earlier days of the sport.

ADVERTISEMENT

New Zealanders Shane Cleaver, Ben Afeaki, Crag Clarke, Reggie Goodes, James Broadhurst, Mark Reddish and Kane Barrett have all called time on their playing days due to concussion symptoms – and there are a host of players who have spent extended periods out from the game too. Chiefs player Sam McNicol has barely played in the last two years and must surely be considering pulling the plug – a sad story for a man so early into his professional career. Kane Hames, the man who played for the All Blacks without having a Super Rugby contract, also hasn’t been sighted for the Chiefs this year – which will be disappointing for the All Blacks but even more troubling for the man himself.

A slightly more intriguing case is Dane Coles, who spent the early part of 2017 watching the game from the sidelines due to concussion but made a reappearance in the latter half of the year, only to rupture his ACL whilst playing for the All Blacks. Coles hasn’t been spotted on the field since and has openly spoken about what his plans are for life after rugby.

It is expected that Coles will take no part in Super Rugby this year. With the competition not concluding until August, Coles must be especially unlucky with injuries as recovery from ACL surgery normally takes 4 to 6 months. Given his concussion history, hopefully, he has no lingering symptoms when he finally returns to the field.

Reported concussions have dramatically increased in the last few years, which means that either incidents of concussion are on the up or that we’re simply seeing concussions diagnosed more readily now. Whilst the game is as physical and confrontational as ever, it seems unlikely that players are taking knocks to the head more frequently than in previous years, which indicates that the game as a whole is taking concussion more seriously now that it has in the past.

ADVERTISEMENT

This, of course, is excellent for the current crop of players, but it’s equally as concerning for the surely frightening number of players who played on through concussion and did themselves even more damage in the past. Studies around the world are now showing the impact that playing high contact sport can have on later quality of life, and it’s a scary outlook.

Rugby is rightly becoming far more serious about concussion now, and while it’s an absolute tragedy that so many players are having to cut their careers short, it’s the right decision given the alternatives. Let’s just hope that the players who have forged ahead in the past aren’t punished due to the less stringent rules of yester-year.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 23 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

143 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The Waikato young gun solving one of rugby players' 'obvious problems' Injury breeds opportunity for Waikato entrepreneur
Search