Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The current day Springboks who can realistically make it into the Hall of Fame

Pieter-Steph du Toit and Cheslin Kolbe. ((Photos by Catherine Steenkeste/Getty Images and Franco Arland/Getty Images)

World Rugby’s Hall of Fame isn’t as prominent as it should be with rugby fans, but nonetheless is an important part of rugby’s building history.

ADVERTISEMENT

In 2023 modern-day greats Dan Carter, Bryan Habana, Thierry Dusautoir, George Smith and Juan Martin Hernandez were inducted into the Hall.

With the Springboks achieving back-to-back Rugby World Cups and building a successful 2024 season with a Rugby Championship, how many of the current-day Boks realistically will make it into the Hall of Fame?

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

There are 15 South Africans who have been inducted, two coaches in Kitch Christie and Jake White, and 13 players including Bryan Habana (inducted 2023), Os du Randt (2019), Danie Gerber (2015), Hennie Muller (2015), Francois Pienaar (2011).

The bar is very high with players like Victor Matfield, Percy Montgomery, and Jean de Villiers, 100 Test cap veterans, not currently inducted. Of the current-day players, who has the best chance of making it in?

Pieter-Steph du Toit

Of the two Rugby World Cup campaigns, the most important player on the field in both finals was Pieter-Steph du Toit. In 2019 he terrorised England flyhalf George Ford as England were suffocated out of the game. Duane Vermeulen was awarded man-of-the-match after winning three turnovers, but Du Toit had a case also as best on ground. Later, Du Toit won World Player of the Year for 2019. Against New Zealand in 2023 he produced a man-of-the-match performance with 28 tackles against the All Blacks.

After nearly losing a leg due to a rare injury, du Toit’s career is defined by overcoming the injuries that have threatened to end it, to rise to the top and perform at his best on the biggest stage. With two incredible World Cup final performances, one being a man of the match,  if anyone is a “lock” for the Hall of Fame from the current roster it has to be Du Toit.

ADVERTISEMENT

Hall of Fame case: Lock

Siya Kolisi 

The Springbok captain is going to be a Hall of Famer. As a personality in the game, Kolisi is an iconic figure after leading South Africa in both Rugby World Cup titles. Icons simply get inducted. Off the pitch he has dedicated himself to others and notable causes, becoming bigger than a rugby player.

On the field, Kolisi has produced individual greatness but without recognition. In 2021 he was one of the best in the world influencing every game he played in, but failed to garner a World Player of the Year nomination. That was a discredit to his ability, where he was erasing opposition points with 2-3 turnovers in scoring positions per game. He was deserving based on performance but that was overlooked.

Kolisi is a lock for the Hall of Fame joining the other two World Cup-winning captains from South Africa, Francois Pienaar and John Smit.

Hall of Fame case: Lock

Eben Etzebeth

He’s become the most capped Springbok of all-time and is highly regarded within South Africa and abroad. While Etzebeth has a good case for the Hall of Fame, he’s not a “lock” by any stretch of the imagination.

ADVERTISEMENT

As a player, he is a world-class lineout operator, but his attacking game is built on one thing, big carries. He can be a monster, but he can also be too big to be effective.

There are many sides that have shut down Etzebeth and limited his effectiveness. Ireland wing James Lowe famously put him on the chairlift. Wales sent the wood choppers to South Africa in 2022 and axed him down with grass cutters. On his day, he is obviously a force to be dealt with. But it’s not every day he’s that guy. Out of the South African locks, RG Snyman has proven to be more skilful and produced more with an offloading game.

The other consideration for Etzebeth is the locks that aren’t in the Hall of Fame that he has to compete with.

All Black Sam Whitelock, a two-time World Cup winner with 153 Tests, is in the queue. Brodie Retallick, 2014 World Player of the Year, is also waiting. Not to mention Victor Matfield, a former captain who did more for South Africa. Although it might not count for much at international level, Matfield led the Bulls to three Super Rugby titles. You can feel Wales lock Alun Wyn Jones, the most capped Test player in history, getting in already.

After those players are inducted, then Etzebeth will be looked at and considered you would think. If those players aren’t yet in the Hall, neither will Etzebeth.

Hall of Fame case: Good

Cheslin Kolbe

The hot-stepping wing has become a fan favourite globally since debuting in 2018. An electric game-breaker, Kolbe has the career “moments”.

His try at the end of the 2019 World Cup final, although with the result already sealed, became legendary. Against the British & Irish Lions, he scored a similar one in the third deciding Test that helped win that series. Against France in the 2023 quarter-final, he scored one of the key first-half tries on the end of a Jesse Kriel grubber kick.

Kolbe is certainly a Springbok great based on the “moments”, but the bar for the Hall of Fame is high. Injuries have prevented Kolbe from playing more Test rugby so far, he has played just 39 Tests since his debut six years ago.

He’s scored 16 tries in his international career, a number that seems incredibly low for a player of his talent. Kurt-Lee Arendse already has more (17), while ex-pat Scotland wing Duhan van der Merwe has powered on to 29 Test tries, breaking the Scotland record.

While tries aren’t everything and the World Cup wins clearly mean more to a player, when it comes down to an individual case of Hall of Fame, Kolbe’s case isn’t as strong as others. All Black wing and 2015 Rugby World Cup winner Julian Savea (46 tries in 54 Tests) has a stronger case.

Hall of Fame case: Weak

Handre Pollard 

The 77-Test flyhalf has become South Africa’s second-highest point scorer in Test rugby with 755 points.

As a goal kicker, Pollard has become one of the best and certainly warrants credit on an all-time goal kickers list.

He was parachuted into the 2023 Rugby World Cup squad midway through the tournament and produced clutch goals to propel South Africa to the title.

In 2019 he kicked well off the tee enough despite error-ridden performances with ball-in-hand in a limited role behind a strong pack.

In between World Cup years, he hasn’t done much. Injuries plagued his early Test years, and he had a limited role in South Africa’s game plan through the middle years.

The Springboks had very little, if any, team success outside of World Cups during that time, failing to capture SANZAAR titles until 2024 when Sacha Feinberg-Mngomezulu assumed the role. With Pollard they won the truncated tournament in 2019 with wins over Argentina and Australia, without beating New Zealand.

Pollard’s never been a top-five flyhalf in Test rugby at any stage of his Test career, with a complete game where the attack is structured around his playmaking ability.

He has not produced a meaningful number of try assists, or line breaks, or run an attack with a high usage rate. He’s been limited to a basic distributing role and dead ball kicker, that is from penalties during stoppages, either for the touchline or for goals.

Pollard will go down as a Bok great but not as a great No 10 in the history of the game. If he makes it into the Hall of Fame, it is purely down to his goal-kicking prowess.

Hall of Fame case: Average

Rassie Erasmus

Erasmus has been regarded as the “head coach” of the Springboks since 2018, yet the 2020-23 era technically belonged to Jacques Nienaber. Officially, Erasmus has one Rugby World Cup win as head coach and one as a Director of Rugby.

By extension, Erasmus’ win rate with the Springboks in Test rugby as “head coach” is a touch lower than Ian Foster’s (69.44 versus 69.57).

Ian Foster isn’t being touted as a Hall of Fame coach. However, Rugby World Cups can change the entire narrative of a player or coaches career and Erasmus is no different.

The 2019 run of Canada, Namibia, Italy, Japan, Wales and England has been immortalised with possession of the William Webb Ellis trophy.

He can ride Sam Cane’s red card and Jordie Barrett’s missed penalty into the Hall of Fame and go down as the genius mastermind of the result, a point victory over a 14-man All Black side.

Those titles put Erasmus up there in rare company. He might become the first “head coach” to win two Rugby World Cups in 2027.

Erasmus isn’t done yet either, winning a first full-sized Rugby Championship in 2024. More of those will add weight to what is already a good case for induction.

Hall of Fame case: Good

Watch the highly acclaimed five-part documentary Chasing the Sun 2, chronicling the journey of the Springboks as they strive to successfully defend the Rugby World Cup, free on RugbyPass TV (*unavailable in Africa)

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

33 Comments
T
TI 13 days ago

I started smelling fish in the segment about Etzebeth, so I scrolled back to look up the name of the author.

And then everything started to make sense.

This is a therapy session, combined with trigger click-bait aimed at South Africans.

Ben Smith has a long history of slagging many South African players, Pollard for some odd reason, among his favorite.

My favorite Ben Smith piece is from 2023. When Malcolm Marx got injured, and Pollard was called to the squad, Ben Smith wrote an article titled: “Sorry South Africans, Pollard will not save you.”

Which, of course, aged worse than fine milk on hot summer day.

Keep ‘em coming, Ben.

P
PaPaRumple 25 days ago

Hey all I finally had the idea to start a online petition to put a stop to this guys unprofessional bias writing. https://chng.it/CnGd4kQz6C

H
Hellhound 52 days ago

BS from BS. Done no homework. Spitting out fan favorites just to create a reaction. Trolling for views. Makes him feel important. There was many players, past and current that would/should make it into HOF. Different eras and evolution of the game must also be taken into context. Everyone here can name at least 20 players each that deserve to be there. From many countries. Maybe instead of giving BS his way, we can really discuss who we think deserve it. Of course, people will differ and that's what will make it fun. There is many players who was great that few current fans would know or heard of. Players that would run rings around teams.

N
NE 52 days ago

Gotta love Ben Smith's sense of humour. Unless you're a typical saffa rugby dunce you'll realize that this was tongue-in-cheek at its best.

M
Marc Jones 64 days ago

Yeah, so the thing about this article is that you’re comparing a lot of players and coaches who have retired from the game with Springboks And their coach currently currently involved in the game…

And while most of your assessments are more or less accurate, all of these people have a few more years to go before anyone can make a judgment on where they stand…

I suspect that even 3 consecutive rugby world cups will still not be enough for some if they were to win the next one

J
JE 66 days ago

Ben almost got through that article, without making a snarky comment about how lucky the Boks and Rassie were to win back to back. Small steps, but he is getting there...

P
PR 65 days ago

The question is whether he is deranged enough to believe what he is writing or is inserting those snarky comments as a way of trolling to get his article trending on the site (which it is). I have no problem with people having negative opinions about the Boks, but BS seems to be a genuine troll used in a cynical way by World Rugby to boost engagement on its website. Beyond his occasional error-strewn articles, the only evidence that BS works as a journalist at all is his X account - which is purely for trolling purposes. He doesn't seem to travel to away games when the All Blacks are playing and the only evidence that he is actually a real person was a recent picture posted by Jamie Wall. Even then, the person in the photo looks nothing like the photo BS has on his X account. It's all very bizarre.

S
SM 66 days ago

So a former Banker knows rugby

P
PR 66 days ago

I think it's pronounced 'W*nker'.


But, yeah, Mr Smith seems to be a collections officer by trade. Not sure why that makes him qualified to be Head of Editorial NZ for RugbyPass. The bar must be really low.


I am genuinely perplexed why a website owned by World Rugby would employ him. His writing is substandard and littered with inaccuracies and spelling errors. I can only assume they have signed off on him trolling Bok fans to get more traffic to the site, which is such a cynical way for World Rugby to run a website.


It's actually worth digging a bit deeper into just why a troll is used in this way to get after SA rugby. Very strange.

J
JD 66 days ago

Rassie Erasmus, probably the greatest coach in rugby history. Guaranteed Hall of Fame.

However, HoF is an American concept and so far hasn't amounted to much in the rugby world.

B
BM 66 days ago

BS from BS - just put the jinx on all the players he backs to make HOF - he's never right in predictions.

D
DA 66 days ago

I don't even read his garbage

B
BP 66 days ago

Ben Smith - Hall of Fame below rock bottom! Worst writer ever. Really hope he does not get paid by Rugbypass or WR to write this constant BS.....

L
Lulu 66 days ago

R.E. definitely. Taken a squad at rock bottom to world Champs.


He has pushed the envelope and made a mockery of world rugby. Yes he does have his critics, though his antics have been very entertaining.


He has almost single handedly changed the game as we see it now.


Riding on a red card and missed penalty into hall of fame, I don't think so.

P
PR 66 days ago

"Julian Savea (46 tries in 54 Tests) has a stronger case." This the same Savea who was charged with assault?

m
midnight mangler 67 days ago

I just have to read the headline to know who wrote the article 😂

J
Jacque 67 days ago

This bloke is an ABSOLUTE BELLEND.


He writes a load of RUBBISH about the BOKS anyway. ZERO SENSE.

D
Docant 67 days ago

Rassie is a shoe in

J
JD 67 days ago

"He can ride Sam Cane’s red card and Jordie Barrett’s missed penalty into the Hall of Fame and go down as the genius mastermind of the result, a point victory over a 14-man All Black side." - Aside from this rather biased comment, a good article... Why would the impartial actions of a referee, or opponent error influence the eligibility of someone to enter the hall of fame? If your logic holds, then Danie Gerber should be omitted from the HOF because in that one game the ref missed a high tackle, and the opponent's hooker missed his jumper....

C
CR 67 days ago

Couldn’t help but stick the knife in at the end of the article 😂 typical. Mate, Rassie will go down as a legend of the game regardless of what you say.

N
NE 52 days ago

Only if you're an ignorant saffa rugby dunce. For the rest of the true rugby loving world hell always be rugby unions number one clown.

W
WW 67 days ago

These one pointers are gonna haunt us for time memorium.

W
WB 67 days ago

Maybe Etzebeth is a bit ahead in the queue when it comes to Retallick and Whitelock

Wyn-Jones not so much he didn't really win anything. Most modern Welsh players were bang average to be honest.

Where is Aaron Smith in this conversation?

Matfield definitely as he changed a position, much like McCaw and George Smith.

When it comes to these awards play in a winning team and being inducted will be much easier.

J
JWH 67 days ago

Alun Wyn Jones has played the most tests in rugby history so that's something.


I don't understand the comment about Whitelock and Retallick. Are you saying Etzebeth should be in front of them or behind them? There are strong cases for both, but unfortunately the greatest locking pair of all time might just beat out Etzebeth on this one. However, it is entirely possible that it goes Whitelock, Etzebeth, then Retallick as well.


I also don't get the comment on Smith. This article is about SA (if you look past Ben Smiths horrendous bias), so he doesn't factor in.


Of course, being in a winning team does make it easier to be inducted into the HOF. But you have to consider, what makes a winning team? I would say the 2010-2016 All Blacks were the greatest team of all time, and they had 0 weaknesses. I would also say the same about the 2019-2024 Springboks, which are also a great winning team, but also have no weaknesses. Weaknesses come in the form of bad personnel in most cases, but for great teams to form there can be no weaknesses, so the players in these teams are always good, and the stand out players are Hall of Famers.

A
AV 67 days ago

Ben Smith Hall of Fame case as journalist / opinionist - Zero (below weak)

N
NE 52 days ago

Rugby union not your thing I see.

C
CR 67 days ago

😂 true

F
Flankly 67 days ago

It's all a bit hilarious.


The sole criterion is an "outstanding contribution to rugby". Current inductees include a high school, at least two rugby clubs, at least three international rugby teams, and a series (The Varsity Match). Also Nelson Mandela.


So, forget the current Boks. My nominees for the World Rugby Hall of Fame are 1. The barman in Toners of Lower Baggot St, 2. Ellis Park Stadium, and 3. The rolling maul.

W
WW 67 days ago

Why do they always forget the crazy fans too!!!

G
GG 67 days ago

Crikey Ben, you must be pretty desperate and bored to write an article like this. When Boks don’t play you don’t have material. Most Saffa supporters don’t even know about or care about Hall of Famers

S
SF 67 days ago

Fair article.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Yep, that's exactly what I want.

Glasgow won the URC and Edinburgh finished 16th, but Scotland won the six nations, Edinburgh would qualify for the Champions Cup under your system.

It's 'or'. If Glasgow won the URC or Scotland won the six nations. If one of those happens I believe it will (or should) be because the league is in a strong place, and that if a Scotland side can do that, there next best club team should be allowed to reach for the same and that would better serve the advancement of the game.


Now, of course picking a two team league like Scotland is the extreme case of your argument, but I'm happy for you to make it. First, Edinbourgh are a good mid table team, so they are deserving, as my concept would have predicted, of the opportunity to show can step up. Second, you can't be making a serious case that Gloucester are better based on beating them, surely. You need to read Nicks latest article on SA for a current perspective on road teams in the EPCR. Christ, you can even follow Gloucester and look at the team they put out the following week to know that those games are meaningless.


More importantly, third. Glasgow are in a league/pool with Italy, So the next team to be given a spot in my technically imperfect concept would be Benneton. To be fair to my idea that's still in it's infancy, I haven't given any thought to those 'two team' leagues/countries yet, and I'm not about to 😋

They would be arguably worse if they didn't win the Challenge Cup.

Incorrect. You aren't obviously familiar with knockout football Finn, it's a 'one off' game. But in any case, that's not your argument. You're trying to suggest they're not better than the fourth ranked team in the Challenge Cup that hasn't already qualified in their own league, so that could be including quarter finalists. I have already given you an example of a team that is the first to get knocked out by the champions not getting a fair ranking to a team that loses to one of the worst of the semi final teams (for example).

Sharks are better

There is just so much wrong with your view here. First, the team that you are knocking out for this, are the Stormers, who weren't even in the Challenge Cup. They were the 7th ranked team in the Champions Cup. I've also already said there is good precedent to allow someone outside the league table who was heavily impacted early in the season by injury to get through by winning Challenge Cup. You've also lost the argument that Sharks qualify as the third (their two best are in my league qualification system) South African team (because a SAn team won the CC, it just happened to be them) in my system. I'm doubt that's the last of reasons to be found either.


Your system doesn't account for performance or changes in their domestic leagues models, and rely's heavily on an imperfect and less effective 'winner takes all' model.

Giving more incentives to do well in the Challenge Cup will make people take it more seriously. My system does that and yours doesn't.

No your systems doesn't. Not all the time/circumstances. You literally just quoted me describing how they aren't going to care about Challenge Cup if they are already qualifying through league performance. They are also not going to hinder their chance at high seed in the league and knockout matches, for the pointless prestige of the Challenge Cup.


My idea fixes this by the suggesting that say a South African or Irish side would actually still have some desire to win one of their own sides a qualification spot if they win the Challenge Cup though. I'll admit, its not the strongest incentive, but it is better than your nothing. I repeat though, if your not balance entries, or just my assignment, then obviously winning the Challenge Cup should get you through, but your idea of 4th place getting in a 20 team EPCR? Cant you see the difference lol


Not even going to bother finishing that last paragraph. 8 of 10 is not an equal share.

126 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Stuart Lancaster Racing 92 exit rumours wide of the mark Stuart Lancaster Racing 92 exit rumours wide of the mark
Search