Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Curwin Bosch lands last-minute penalty to snatch dramatic Super Rugby Unlocked victory for Sharks

(Photo by Frikkie Kapp/Gallo Images/Getty Images)

Curwin Bosch landed an injury-time penalty from 40 metres out to sneak a one-point win for the Sharks over Griquas in Kimberley on Friday.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 34-33 win keeps alive the Durban side’s chances of winning the title in what is becoming a tournament heavily influenced by COVID-19-influenced cancelled matches.

For 80 minutes Griquas threw everything at the Sharks and with time up looked likely to record their first win of the season.

Video Spacer

Why the Pumas pose no threat to the All Blacks | The Breakdown | Healthspan Elite Fan’s Voice

Video Spacer

Why the Pumas pose no threat to the All Blacks | The Breakdown | Healthspan Elite Fan’s Voice

However, Griquas – who had to replace their captain and flyhalf George Whitehead (who fracture his hand in the captain’s run on Thursday) – were very poor from restarts.

It was from one of those restart shockers that they coughed up the possession that allowed the Sharks to steal victory.

The first real scoring opportunity came when the Sharks went offside just outside their own 22 and Tinus de Beer made it 3-0 for the home team.

The Sharks hit back with the first try five minutes later – a turnover by Thembelani Bholi inside his own 22 and a quick counter that exposed Griquas’ compromised defence. Scrumhalf Sanele Nohamba finished the sweeping move and Curwin Bosch added the conversion – 7-3.

ADVERTISEMENT

That was followed by a line-out penalty to Griquas towards the end of the first quarter, which De Beer slotted to narrow the gap to 6-7, and then regained the lead for his team (9-7) with his third penalty in the 27th minute.

That’s how it stayed till the half-time break.

The second half started with a scrum penalty top the Sharks, which Curwin Bosch slotted to reclaim the lead – 10-9.

That didn’t last long. Through a series of phases, Griquas worked their way into the Sharks 22 and eventually Ederies Arendse went over for a home-team try. De Beer made it a 16-10 game with the conversion.

Just past the 50-minute mark a powerful scrum by Griquas opened a gap down the blindside and allowed wing Eduan Keyter to break through a couple of weak tackles and sprint over for the home team’s second try. De Beer made it 23-10 with the conversion.

ADVERTISEMENT

Another restart mistake by Griquas – and there were several – allowed the Sharks to pounce on a ball close to the Griquas line. The TMO ruling ruled out the try.

However, the Sharks had a scrum feed five metres from the home team’s line. The scrum was all over the place, but the Sharks managed to get the ball out to replacement Manie Libbok, who went over in the right corner. Bosch narrowed the gap to 17-23 with the conversion.

The Griquas response was immediate – a line-out turnover resulted in flank Gideon van der Merwe sprinting over for the third try. De Beer made it 30-17 with the conversion.

Another poor restart from Griquas allowed the Sharks possession inside the home team’s 22. A series of phases saw Jeremy Ward finish off the third try for the visitors. Bosch made it a six-point game (24-30) with the conversion.

That was followed by a sweeping move from deep inside the Sharks half, finished off by Dylan Richardson. Bosch reclaimed the lead (31-30) with the conversion.

With 10 minutes remaining Bosch had a shot from well inside his own half, but just pushed it wide.

One minute from time the Sharks were penalised for a line-out maul infringement and from 40 metres, on the angle, De Beer slotted the kick to reclaim the lead – 33-31.

From the restart, the Sharks were awarded a breakdown penalty and from 40 metres out Bosch slotted the winning kick – 34-33.

Sharks 34 (Tries to Sanele Nohamba, Manie Libbok, Jeremy Ward, Dylan Richardson; four conversions and two penalties to Curwin Bosch)

Griquas 33 (Tries to Ederies Arendse, Eduan Keyter, Gideon van der Merwe; three conversions and four penalties to Tinus de Beer)

– Rugby365

ADVERTISEMENT

O2 Inside Line: All In | Episode 5 | Making Waves

Confidence knocks and finding your people | Flo Williams | Rugby Rising Locker Room

Tackling reasons for drop-out in sport | Zainab Alema | Rugby Rising Locker Room

Krakow | Leg 3 | Day 2 | HSBC Challenger Series | Full Day Replay

Kubota Spears vs Tokyo Sungoliath | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Jet Lag: The biggest challenge facing international sports? | The Report

Boks Office | Episode 39 | The Investec Champions Cup is back

Rugby’s Greatest Rivalry? | New Zealand & Australia | Sevens Wonders | Episode 5

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

E
Eliza Galloway 1 hour ago
Geoff Parling: An Englishman roasting the Lions?

Email: prowizardgilbertrecovery(@)  engineer.comWhatsApp: +1 (920) 408‑1234Telegram: https://t.me/Pro_Wizard_Gilbert_RecoveryI never imagined I’d become a victim of a scam—especially in the fast-moving world of cryptocurrency. When I was offered a chance to appear on a popular crypto podcast, I was excited. It seemed like a golden opportunity to gain exposure, connect with industry professionals, and build credibility within the crypto community. The podcast appeared legitimate, complete with a sleek website, professional branding, glowing testimonials, and an active social media presence.After a few exchanges with the supposed host, I was asked to pay $9,500 to secure my spot on the show. Trusting the apparent professionalism of the platform, I went ahead with the payment. I envisioned the new doors this would open—partnerships, recognition, and new opportunities. But everything changed once the payment was made.Suddenly, all communication stopped. My emails and messages went unanswered. The podcast’s website vanished, and so did their social media presence. That’s when reality hit—I had been scammed.I was devastated. Angry, embarrassed, and desperate to find a solution, I began searching for help. That’s when I discovered PRO WIZARD GILBERT RECOVERY. At first, I was skeptical, but with nothing left to lose, I decided to reach out.To my surprise, their team responded quickly and took my case seriously. Using advanced investigative tools and digital tracking techniques, they began tracing the scammer’s digital footprint. I watched as they worked tirelessly, putting the pieces together.Amazingly, PRO WIZARD GILBERT RECOVERY was able to recover 95% of my lost funds. The relief I felt was indescribable. Not only did I get back most of what I lost, but I also walked away with a hard-earned lesson about the importance of due diligence and caution in the digital world.While I wish I had never fallen into the trap, I’m incredibly thankful for the support and professionalism of PRO WIZARD GILBERT RECOVERY. They didn’t just recover my money—they helped restore my peace of mind. I’m sharing my story in hopes that it helps others avoid the same mistake and encourages them to stay vigilant in the ever-evolving world of cryptocurrency.

44 Go to comments
J
JW 1 hour ago
James O'Connor, the Lions and the great club v country conundrum

Lol you need to shoot your editor for that headline, even I near skipped the article.


France simply need to go to a league format for the Brennus, that will shave two weekends of pointless knockout rugby from their season and raise the competitions standards and mystique no end.


The under age loophole is also a easy door to shut, just remove the lower age limit. WR simply never envisioned a day were teams would target people under the age of 17 or whatever it is now, but much like with Rassie and his use of subs bench, that day was obviously always going to come. I can’t remember how football does it, I think it’s the other way around with them, you can’t sign anyone younger than that but unions can’t stop 17 or 18 yo’s from leaving for a pro club if they want to. There is a transaction that takes place of a few hundred thousand for a normal average player. I’d prefer rugby to be stricter and just keep the union bodies signoff being required.


What really was their problem with Kite and co leaving though? Do we really need a game dominated by Internationals? I even think WR’s proposed calendar might be a bit too much, with at minimum 12 top tier games being played in the World Championship. I think 10 to 12, maybe any one player playing 10 of those 12 is the best way to think of it, for every international team is max, so that they can allow their domestic comps to shine if they want, and other nations like Japan and Fiji can, even some of the home nations maybe, and fill out their calendar with extra tours if they like them as a way to make money. As it is RA don’t have as good a pathway system, so they could simply buy back those players if they turn good. Are they worried they’ll be less likely to? We wait for baited breath for the new season to be laid out in front of us by WR.

It could impose sanctions on the Fédération Française de Rugby, but the body which runs the Top 14 and the ProD2, the Ligue Nationale de Rugby, is entirely independent.

It’s not independent at all. The LNR is a body under, and commissioned by, the FFR (and Government control) to mediate the clubs. FFR can simply install a new club competition if they don’t listen, then you’d see whether the players want to stay at any club who doesn’t tow the line and move to the new competition, as they obviously wouldn’t fall under the auspice of world rugby. They would be rebels, which is fine in and upon itself, but they would isolate themselves from the rest of the game and would need to be OK with that. I have no doubt whatsoever that clubs would have to and want to fall in line to remain part of the EPCR and French rugby. Probably even the last thing they would want is to compete with another French domestic competition that has all the advantages they don’t.


All those players would do good for a few seasons in France, especially the fringe ones, with thankfully zero risk of them being poached if they turn good. New Zealand had a turn at keeping all of it’s talent, and while it upticked the competitiveness of the Super Rugby teams into a total dominance of Australian and South African counterparts (who were suffering more heavily than most the other way at that stage), it didn’t have as positive an effect on the next step up as ensuring young talents development is not hindered does. Essentially NZR flooded the locate market with players but inevitably it didn’t think the local economy could sustain any more pro teams itself, so now we are seeing a normal amount of exodus for the availability of places again. Are Australia in exactly the same footing? I think so, finances where dicey for a while perhaps but I doubt they are putting money constraints on their contracting now. It’s purely about who leaves to open up opportunity.

62 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Fur set to fly as Parisian duo dragged into Top 14 relegation dogfight Fur set to fly as Parisian duo dragged into Top 14 relegation dogfight
Search