'Rejuvenated and refreshed': Damian McKenzie on the secret to the Chiefs' winning run

It is not just the danger of facing a big team in the round of 16: you might also get one of them in your pool. That would be two extra massive matches. No team in that scenario is winning any world cup. Its as simple as that.

Currently Argentina are 5th, England 6th, Scotland 7th and Australia 8th. With a spread of 3.5 ranking points between those 4.

Playing SA first is not bad as it means losing points at the right time. They must beat Argentina twice in subsequent matches and will gain more there. They have England away and may need to win that and another high value win over: NZ in Perth, Ireland in Dublin or France in Paris will certainly help.

Some sympathy for 7th placed Scotland is required. Scotland were eliminated in Pool stage in 2019 and as rankings were frozen at end of RWC 2019 for RWC 2023 draw, Scotland were ranked 9th. They made massive progress to be ranked 5th before 2023 but it didn’t count and they were drawn in their group of death with Ireland and SA and more or less eliminated by the draw. Compare with England who were terrible between world cups but were top 4 ranked in 2019 which gave them a quarter final against Fiji in 2023 to make a semi final.

The swing in ranking points between Scotland to England before and after RWC 2023 was a massive 6.5

Scotland should be sitting comfortably in 5th but are now 7th and will struggle to make top6. If they don’t make top 6 and get an unlucky draw they could be out at the last 16 stage. In other words the farcical draw in 2023 means that Scotland are still being punished for their showing in RWC 2019 and this may last at least until 2027.

I hope for Justice sakes they make the top 6.

Of course, there is the slippery slope argument - which is fair, there can and probabl should be be limits on what a player should be able to do. But winding people up? That’s sport. It always has been and always will be - emotions can and will be manipulated. If we can’t do that, then it’s not sport. It’s called gaining a psychological edge. We are all well aware of the dark arts of rugby and it’s an accepted part of the game. There is no reason a celebration cannot be either.

My belief is that you’re immediately going to a worst case scenario and trying to nip this behaviour in the bud, which is unnecessary. He’s having fun and kids look up to that. Combine that with the respect that the vast majority of professional rugby players show, and you have a winning formula. See my original comment regarding him getting his ass handed to him at some stage or another. Maybe even this very weekend. But to say that Pollock is abusive and humiliating? Calm down, he’s just a talented kid having a good time.

Ashton had the swan dive as his trademark. Owen Farrell bombed a try against Toulouse by dropping the ball attempting to dive.

The botched ones are always more fun to watch.

A form of personal antagonism and humiliation is disrespecting people and winding people up after scoring or winning.

Do you want to see matches where International players abuse each other after tries and after final whistles? That’s not a game of respect. And its creeping in.

Of course its sport and the world keeps turning. But sport is about kids participating and showing each other respect. Winning is the objective but Its not just about absolute winners and losers. We see enough of that sickness around the world now, it needs to be kept out of rugby.

Rugby has always been, and will always be, a teamwork game of hard work and respect. The occasional showboater won’t change that. Be a fan, not a critic. Or as we in South Africa say: don’t a poes, be lekker. It’s just a game.

He’s got some great ability for sure, a bit more one trick for me than players like Carter, Narawa, Springer, Ennor, Reece, Nareki, Tavatavanawai (as a winger). I would put him in Fihaki catergory in the number of strengths he brings, which I have to give to you is what looks like is going to be enough for selection listenting to the rumours. So could just depend on what the coach wants (maybe second with his wing partner Fihi, to Tavatavanawai as a crash ball wing) and he’s a selection, who knows lol.

Here about that 14 yo though! It was actually one of the interesting topics about Billy Beane. Some sort of autobiography on him would be a very interesting read I’d imagine. It’s something that should be implemented and I actually thought things were a lot better these days. They guy NZR brought in to run there new commercial arm did a very interesting vlog with Anton Oliver actually. On YT somewhere.

Same goes for French U20 kid Patrick Tuifua no doubt as well.

Want you wont be able to do is select Jegou as a 22(read 21 on a team sheet), when you only have intention to use him as a 20, unless he actually plays in the backline often enough(like Botia).

Yes well I was only postulating on RWs point. They don’t have to go back to vote necessarily if they all just think this is awesome perhaps, my point is the people that voted such stipulation not necessary in the first place. maybe have changed their mind and call for some amendment?

The sort of balance you’d prefer to see isn’t something you’d generally dedicate an article to? I mentioned in another post that SR players aren’t tiring out as much as weve got through the season, have they been able to transition through the weeks to the new required fitness that easily? Have they adapted to the refereeing and found new ways to slow the opposition (therefor everyone is doing it to each other) down?

We don’t need any knee jerk reactions/big changes. They’re treating injured players with a bit of respect again, that takes time. I’d like some sort of fast/smooth interchange option, but I’d also like to keep it as close to current affect on the game as possible, and those two ideas don’t align. I’d start with bedding new speed of play priorities in, while moving to one less total substitutions allowed. 7, and go from there. That doesn’t quite allow being able to go off and on as we’d like, as that would burn through that number, in a tougher 15 man game. quite quickly. Anything reversed inside 5 minutes (10 for stitches/HIA) doesn’t count to the limit perhaps, or we have to bare with medics on the field?

See how it goes with 7 subs a game instead of 8 and then reduce as needed. They actually allow injured fr to return for certain things right? Just cards and HIAs?

I’m a big fan of the URC and it looks to be steadily improving. Every chance it will have it’s fourth different winner this season.