Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Dallagio has selection advice for Eddie Jones as England hit by backrow crisis

Lawrence Dallagio

Lawrence Dallaglio is urging Eddie Jones to pick the Exeter pair of Sam Simmonds and Don Armand to solve England’s Six Nations backrow crisis created by injuries to Billy Vunipola and Nathan Hughes and James Haskell’s red card.

ADVERTISEMENT

While Haskell is still to appear before a disciplinary hearing for his illegal hit on Harlequins Jamie Roberts, Jones knows he must rule Vunipola out of England’s bid for a historic third successive title with the Saracens No8 facing at least 12 weeks out after breaking is arm against Ospreys. Hughes is likely to miss the opening three championship games with Italy (Feb 4), Wales and Scotland due to knee ligament damage.

With Bath flanker Sam Underhill only just back after concussion problems, Jones will have to supplement his back resources when he names England’s Six Nations squad on Thursday.

Teimana Harrison, the Northampton No8, put in a big shift in the European Champions Cup pool win over Clermont Auvergne and will be in the selection mix but Dallaglio is adamant Armand and Simmonds deserve the chance to line up alongside Chris Robshaw as the starting back row against Italy in Rome.

That would mean shifting Robshaw to the No7 role Jones feels does not fully suit the Harlequin flanker’s skills set but given the injury problems, the former captain would be a safe pair of hands given the way Simmonds operates as a No8. The Exeter forward is much smaller than Vunipola and Hughes as a No8 but the lack of size would be offset by the inclusion of Armand who was capped by England on last summer’s tour of Argentina and was a key figure in Exeter’s Premiership title triumph last season.

Dallaglio, the former England No8 and captain, said: “Billy’s injury is headache for Eddie Jones who was really looking forward to having him back and so were the rest of his England team mates. With Nathan being out and James picking up a very untimely red card it’s going to cause selection problems. Harrison put in a very good performance for Saints in front of Jones and that will have been noted but Simmonds was outstanding for Exeter against Montpellier and I like the dynamism he offers off the base of the scrum.

“I know Eddie has said Simmonds needs to be a bit bigger and there was a possibility he may have given him a run at No7 against Italy with Billy back but his hand may have to be played now and Simmonds could slot into the No8 role without any problem. Eddie may also have to move Chris Robshaw back to No7 and then there are a number of choices for blindside with Courtney Lawes or Maro Itoje or dip into the pool of talent we have and the next in line is Don Armand. He has been outstanding for the Chiefs and cannot be that far away. You cannot say that week in, week out, Armand doesn’t deserve his opportunity. It is about balance in the back row and if you pick Simmonds and Armand you have club mates alongside each other.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We don’t know which bone Billy has fractured and you see a lot of guys in rugby who have broken their forearm and then suffer another break by coming back too soon. It is one of those injuries you have to get right and it is wretched luck for Billy who also missed the Lions tour and then had the first half of the season out with a knee injury. I know how hard he worked to get fit and be able to hit the ground running against Wasps.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

287 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Tyrone Green decision has huge bearing on his international future Tyrone Green decision has huge bearing on his international future
Search