Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Damian McKenzie is no better than when he started his All Blacks career

(Photo by Emmanuele Ciancaglini/CPS Images/Getty Images)

I’d be quite happy never to see Damian McKenzie don an All Blacks jumper again.

ADVERTISEMENT

I’ve no quarrel with the man, there’s nothing about him that offends or upsets me. Nor would I question his Super Rugby performances or talent.

It’s just that, on the test rugby stage, it feels as if we’ve seen all there is to see.

McKenzie is not New Zealand’s best fullback. That’s Jordie Barrett, by a wide margin.

Video Spacer

Why Dane Coles was key for the All Blacks | Healthspan Elite Performer of the Week

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 2:47
Loaded: 0%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time 2:47
 
1x
    • Chapters
    • descriptions off, selected
    • captions off, selected
    • en (Main), selected
    Video Spacer

    Why Dane Coles was key for the All Blacks | Healthspan Elite Performer of the Week

    Barrett’s form this test season is a credit to him, not least because he’s one of the few All Blacks you would say replicates or betters their franchise efforts.

    We say test rugby is a step up and actually sometimes it is. But often, with 2021 being a case in point, the opponents are so short of Super Rugby standard it’s not funny.

    Tonga, Fiji, the United States, Italy; they’d arguably all go a Super season without victory.

    Wales and Australia might nick a game off the Highlanders or Hurricanes, but it’s hard to see them troubling the Crusaders or Blues any time soon.

    I’ll return to the idea of players not regularly replicating their Super Rugby form, but first back to McKenzie.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    The guy has skills and an appealing touch of cheek. He’s ambitious and unpredictable and a handy goalkicker too.

    But, as test rugby’s played these days, he’s not the bloke I want under high balls.

    Teams seem pretty happy to kick to the All Blacks, and provided those kicks are contestable and the chase is a good one, then often it’s effective.

    When the kick’s too deep and the defensive line’s staggered, then look out.

    This All Blacks team still needs to evolve. There remain a number of positions still up for grabs, plus some indecision about how the team should actually play.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Barrett is one player who demands selection in every test of consequence, but we still need a back-up.

    I’m not convinced McKenzie is that guy. I think he lacks the solidity and dependability and accuracy to be a test fullback.

    I also suspect he’s become a bit diminutive to bring the ball back against advancing defences.

    I’d like to see Will Jordan tried at fullback instead. Partly because I believe he’s a good option there, but also to give Sevu Reece more opportunity on the right wing.

    Beyond Jordan, David Havili appeals as a superior option to McKenzie at 15 as well.

    I’d also, when it comes to the back-three, like to see some recognition of who’s actually playing.

    It’s fine, if predictable, that the All Blacks like to have the blindside wing cart the ball up from set pieces. And if that wing is Jonah Lomu or Va’aiga Tuigamala or Rieko Ioane, then happy days.

    But, as it was against Italy, that wing is little old George Bridge and he’s being pounded by a set defensive line, then surely we have enough nous to try something different.

    Good on Bridge for sacrificing his body for the cause, but come on.

    I’d say the form of most of the All Blacks this season has been adequate.

    A few players, such as Jordie and Beauden Barrett, Jordan, Ardie Savea and Sam Whitelock have been consistently good, but not many.

    I reckon that’s a coaching issue. I mean, it’s not as if the All Blacks are up against elite opposition each week.

    And yet, unless they seize on a bad kick-chase, when do New Zealand’s backs bust any defences open?

    With all due respect to Wales and Italy, neither of them are particularly good. Try as the All Blacks might, though, they couldn’t beat either by playing their preferred brand of rugby.

    No, they had to tuck the ball up the jumper and play almost entirely through the forwards.

    How was it that the Italy test went on so long before someone recognised that trying to shift the ball was a waste of time?

    It’s hard not to feel as if this All Blacks team – particularly the backs – has been failed by its coaches. One way or another Ian Foster, for instance, has been involved since 2012 and yet which backs have improved or at least lived up to their Super Rugby billing in that time?

    It’s surely not an issue of talent, as evidenced by McKenzie. He’s as gifted as anyone but, 39 games into his All Blacks career, McKenzie is no better than when he started.

    He may even be worse and, on that basis, it’s time for someone else to show if they’re better equipped to deal with the coaching and tactical inadequacies the team appear stuck with.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    LIVE

    Singapore SVNS | Day 1

    Boks Office | Episode 39 | The Investec Champions Cup is back

    Argentina v France | HSBC SVNS Hong Kong 2025 | Men's Match Highlights

    New Zealand v Australia | HSBC SVNS Hong Kong 2025 | Women's Match Highlights

    Tokyo Sungoliath vs Shizuoka BlueRevs | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

    Reds vs Force | Super Rugby W 2025 | Full Match Replay

    The Rise of Kenya | The Report

    New Zealand in Hong Kong | Brady Rush | Sevens Wonders | Episode 4

    The Fixture: How This Rugby Rivalry Has Lasted 59 Years

    Trending on RugbyPass

    Comments

    19 Comments
    M
    Mike 1237 days ago

    I actually think Dmac's best chance at test rugby is at 10. He played really well there v Argentina. I don't believe the cross field running a la league that he showed during Super 12 will cut it in the the test arena but I think there is scope to bring him on at 10 in the last 20. He's worked on his punting the last few years prob needs a little more distance and he'll be fine.

    B
    Bob 1238 days ago

    I love Damian McKenzie. He got me, a fanatic football (American) fan to put down my loathing of non-American sports and see the excitement in rugby. Now, I love rugby more than any other. Anyway, I can understand if you think he should come off the bench vs starting... but not making the 23 seems mad to me. I think the coaching staff needs to let him go and be himself.

    C
    CB 1240 days ago

    I appreciate this is not the the crux of the article but saying Wales and Australia would be lucky to win a game is staggering. It also amazes me how England routinely get beaten with the arrogant stick with comments like this from Kiwis.

    R
    Russell 1241 days ago

    Your opinion has been well received Moe I'm sure however, if you had read some previous comments, it would suggest that coaching staff, not Damien McKenzie, are being blamed for a below parr performance by the All Blacks. Poor selection and performance in key positions maybe? No disrespect to a quality player in Damien McKenzie, as we have seen some exciting plays from him in the black jersey, the article is being used as an example of poor selection and performance. No malice intended I'm sure....

    m
    moe 1241 days ago

    You can't blame one man for a shit performance from the whole team. Considering it is young squad. Like everyone else it's only your own opinion as mine.
    Unfortunately going after one man ain't gonna do you any justice . You might as well point fingers at the coaching . End of the day it's only ones opinion.

    A
    Allen 1241 days ago

    G and andrew

    J
    Justin 1241 days ago

    That's such nonsense. Wales are a good team at strength. They definitely suffer from some All Blacks hoodoo, but it's doubtful a super rugby team could undo them. And how are you ranking Damien Mackenzie? On fancy stuff I guess. I think he is just guilty of not matching the razzle dazzle he brings at the lower super level . Are his error rate, decision making, defence, really that bad?

    J
    Jono 1242 days ago

    Finally someone brave enough to front the Waikato mob. McKenzie is a gifted player but Jordie Barrett has gone from a good super rugby player to a great full back. Mckenzie's strength is coming off the bench and sliding through half gaps, off loading and creating chances when the defence is tired. He is not tall enough to defuse the up and unders and leaves the All Blacks exposed to that attack. The problem that Ian Foster has is that virtually no one wanted him as coach and his refusal to pick the best people in the each position comes back to haunt him when we lose. The Italy game was a case in point. I get that it's "a log tour, and we have have to keep people fresh" but that was terrible. Yes we won, and the scoreboard suggests comfortably, but the lack of cohesion, the lack of discipline, the lack of ability to adept to the refereeing style was alarming and that comes down to the coaches. They picked the side and they failed to make sure that they ready for the match. Unless there is a major focus change then we will not win the next world cup, in fact, I would not be surprised if we didn't make the semis. God I hope I wrong.

    G
    G 1242 days ago

    It is not about DMac who has played excellents/ defining games for the Abs such as vs England in 2018 and Ireland and Boks (2019). But our offense has not improved vs semifinal 2019 - Foster &Co seem to refuse innovation - just compare what Rennie and Brown do on offense. ABS rely on individual genius (great to have) but have very little creativity in attacking play (having of course amazing players available)

    A
    Andrew 1242 days ago

    Our backplay is unimaginative, predictable and tactically inept. We keep banging away with the same plays of the Hansen era....

    Load More Comments

    Join free and tell us what you really think!

    Sign up for free
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Latest Features

    Comments on RugbyPass

    f
    fl 1 hour ago
    Why Les Kiss and Stuart Lancaster can lead Australia to glory

    “A succession of recent ex-players going straight back into the game as coaches in their early 40’s would prob be enough to kill it stone-dead. Innovation would die a death.”

    Would it? I do think one of the major differences between rugby and most other sports - which we’ve been overlooking - is the degree to which players are expected to lead team meetings & analysis sessions and the like. Someone like Owen Farrell has basically been an assistant coach already for ten years - and he’s been so under a variety of different head coaches with different expectations and playing styles.


    “The most interesting ppl I have met in the game have all coached well into their sixties and they value the time and opportunity they have had to reflect and therefore innovate in the game. That’s based on their ability to compare and contrast between multiple eras.”

    I don’t doubt that that’s true. But having interesting insights doesn’t necessarily mean you’ll be the best able to inspire a team, or the best at managing the backroom staff.


    “Wayne Smith winning the WWC in his mid sixties three years ago prob means nothing to you but it meant a lot to him. It took him back to the roots of is own coaching journey.”

    I don’t doubt that! But I don’t think coaches should be hired on the basis that it means a lot to them.


    “The likes of Carlo Ancelotti and Wayne Bennett and Andy Reid all have a tale to tell. You should open your ears and listen to it!”

    I agree! Never have I ever suggested otherwise!

    176 Go to comments
    J
    JW 5 hours ago
    French bid to poach 109kg 17-year-old dual-code Aussie prospect Heinz Lemoto

    Yes that’s what WR needs to look at. Football had the same problem with european powerhouses getting all the latin talent then you’re gaurenteed to get the odd late bloomer (21/22 etc, all the best footballers can play for the country much younger to get locked) star changing his allegiance.


    They used youth rep selection for locking national elifibilty at one point etc. Then later only counted residency after the age of 18 (make clubs/nations like in this case wait even longer).


    That’s what I’m talking about, not changing allegiance in rugby (were it can only be captured by the senior side), where it is still the senior side. Oh yeah, good point about CJ, so in most cases we probably want kids to be able to switch allegiance, were say someone like Lemoto could rep Tonga (if he wasn’t so good) but still play for Australia’s seniors, while in someone like Kite’s (the last aussie kid to go to France) case he’ll be French qualified via 5 years residency at the age of 21, so France to lock him up before Aussie even get a chance to select him. But if we use footballs regulations, who I’m suggesting WR need to get their a into g replicating, he would only start his 5 years once he turns 18 or whatever, meaning 23 yo is as soon as anyone can switch, and when if they’re good enough teams like NZ and Aus can select them (France don’t give a f, they select anybody just to lock them).

    9 Go to comments
    TRENDING
    TRENDING Scotland confirm summer tour and first visit to NZ since 2000 Gregor Townsend: It’s the first time since 2000 that we’ve been to NZ
    Search