Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Damian Willemse to Saracens would be a win-win scenario for player and club

Damian Willemse's similarities to Alex Goode will be welcomed by Saracens (Photo by Shaun Roy/Gallo Images/Getty Images)

Few teams in Europe will feel as big a World Cup pinch as Saracens are about to experience, as the reigning Gallagher Premiership champions about to lose more players to the international tournament in Japan than any of their domestic rivals.

ADVERTISEMENT

The London club currently have eight players in England’s World Cup squad, one with the Springboks and another with Argentina. A further five players could also be set to be confirmed in the Wales, Scotland and USA squads over the coming weeks.

One area in which Saracens could be particularly stretched is in the back three, where Liam Williams and Sean Maitland will both fancy their chances of joining Elliot Daly in Japan. With Owen Farrell also on his way to the World Cup, potentially pushing Alex Goode back into fly-half duties, Saracens’ back three could look quite bare come the beginning of the season.

As stands, it would leave Saracens with the likes of Alex Lewington, Rotimi Segun, Max Malins and Matt Gallagher to start the campaign. Although they are not lacking for talent, the European champions would be left short-handed should they suffer any injuries. To hammer home that point, Malins is currently suffering from a foot injury.

One solution could be versatile Springbok Damian Willemse, the Western Province and Stormers star who is heavily linked with a short-term move to Allianz Park as cover for the World Cup.

Western Province boss John Dobson raised the possibility of the move ahead of his side’s game against the Free State Cheetahs last weekend, highlighting the positive effect that both Mark McCall and Dan Vickers could have on Willemse’s development in London rather than the player linking up with Edinburgh who were also looking to strike a short-term deal.

Willemse would not be the first player to arrive at Saracens after the early fanfare around their career had died down and their progress had stalled somewhat. Will Skelton initially arrived at Saracens on a short-term loan – before signing a two-year deal with the club – and he then proceeded to hone himself into one of the most effective second rows in European rugby.

ADVERTISEMENT

Therein lies the beauty of this deal for Saracens. Not only would Willemse serve as some much-needed cover during the Rugby World Cup the move would also act as a trial for a potentially longer-term move in the coming years.

At just 21 years of age, Willemse is only beginning to scratch the surface of what he is capable of in senior rugby and his ability to play both full-back and fly-half to a high level replicates one of the many things that the club prizes so highly in Goode, who turned 31 earlier this year.

The Saracens icon doesn’t look anywhere close to being on the decline yet, but to not have potential succession plans in place for players in their 30s would be irresponsible because that decline does inevitably come sooner or later.

Should the move go ahead, Saracens will get an up-close look at one of the most talented young players in world rugby, who has his best years ahead of him. As for Willemse, it would be a win-win scenario for the five-times capped Springbok, barring any sort of significant injury picked up during the loan spell.

ADVERTISEMENT

If he goes on to impress, learns and develop his game under the tutelage of McCall and Vickers, as well as the other coaches on staff at the club, he would return to South Africa in a better spot to push forward and challenge for a post-Rugby World Cup berth with the Springboks.

If he impresses so much as to warrant a long-term contract offer from the club next summer, the Paul Roos Gymnasium product opens up a multitude of doors as to how he wants to progress with his rugby career. Coaches aside, he would also get the opportunity to learn from and develop alongside Goode, and there are far worse mentors and role models to have than the veteran full-back.

Like Goode, Willemse has an array of passes off both hands that allow him to run a back line from the first receiver or carve open a team beyond the gain line. He has a big boot on him, just like the Englishman, bringing that skill set of a kicking fly-half to the full-back position, as well as an adept eye for a gap.

Willemse is a little more direct than Goode, backing his speed as opposed to Goode’s tendency to run laterally more often, attempting to draw defenders or create space, but the similarities far outweigh their differences.

There are plenty of calls for Malins and Manu Vunipola to see more playing time and many Saracens fans will be hoping that the World Cup provides them with exactly that opportunity at the club already accustomed to having a depth of squad and rotating players to keep them fresh throughout an entire season.

If Vunipola is the understudy to Goode at 10 over the next couple of months, having Willemse to rival Malins at 15 is no bad move. The Saracens culture and environment has become one of unrivalled player development in English rugby and to potentially see a player of Willemse’s talent take on that challenge and attempt to reach his potential, is an exciting one for all neutral rugby fans.

If you’re a fan of one of the other 11 Premiership clubs, though, it’s time to go back to the drawing board. The rich could be about to get even richer.

WATCH: The RugbyPass stadium guide to Sapporo where England open their World Cup on September 22 

Video Spacer

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath
Search