Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Danny Cipriani could potentially leave his Gloucester contract a year early

Danny Cipriani

Despite signing a two-year deal in the summer of 2018, Danny Cipriani’s future might not be at Kingsholm next season.

ADVERTISEMENT

The fly-half agreed to terms with Gloucester following his recall to the England squad for the tour of South Africa last year, passing up much more lucrative offers in France in order to stay in the Gallagher Premiership and keep himself in contention for the Rugby World Cup.

RugbyPass understands that the 31-year-old signed for close to £200k with the Cherry and Whites, turning down offers of over double that from France, in a remarkable show of his determination and desire to play for England again.

With those opportunities drying up since the South Africa tour, with Owen Farrell preferred at 10 and George Ford currently the incumbent bench option, the former Wasps fly-half potentially has multiple paths he could take in the coming months.

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

RugbyPass understands that the second year of his deal with Gloucester has a release clause in it that can be activated by the player and that negotiations to restructure that second year of his deal have stalled with the club. Those negotiations also included the possibility of an extension beyond the 2019/20 season.

Cipriani’s market value clearly outstrips the financial package he is currently on, but Gloucester are constrained by their salary cap situation next season, having already added big ticket players such as Jaco Kriel, Franco Mostert and Matt Banahan in 2018. To lock Cipriani down beyond that – and take away any possibility of a release clause being invoked – Gloucester would have to backload the contract, both limiting their salary cap flexibility in 2020/21 and tying up a significant amount of money in a player that would turn 33 in that season.

Gloucester fly-half Danny Cipriani
ADVERTISEMENT

One club that are reportedly interested in Cipriani’s services, should he exercise a release clause, are Harlequins, but they face similar salary cap constraints to Gloucester. RugbyPass understands that the only way they could table an offer appetising enough to lure Cipriani away from the West Country is if Demetri Catrakilis were to move on from the club, something which looks unlikely at this point.

Bath are in the market for a fly-half with Rhys Priestland leaving the Rec at the end of the season, but if reports are to be believed, they are closing in on the signing of Gareth Anscombe from the Cardiff Blues, leaving Cipriani with few options in England, where clubs have largely finalised their squads for next season and are at or close to the salary cap.

With a number of big-name fly-halves coming off contract in the summer of 2020, it is unlikely to be the buyers’ market that the then 32-year-old would want to go into for possibly the last sizeable contract he will sign as a professional player. A potential move at the end of this season to reflect his market value would make sense for his future and cannot be taken off the table.

He has been an integral part of Gloucester’s renaissance this season under Johan Ackermann but there is only so much leeway they have under the salary cap to renegotiate his deal and offer him better terms. They certainly do not have the flexibility to offer him the sort of deal that he was being offered last season by Top 14 clubs.

ADVERTISEMENT

The likely option, as things stand, would be for Cipriani not to invoke any options he has in his contract and see out the second year of his deal with Gloucester, before testing his value on the market in 2020. If a French or Japanese club with space in their budgets were to come in for the playmaker, however, no one could begrudge Cipriani taking the offer sooner, with Eddie Jones and England having seemingly turned away from him.

Watch: Eddie Jones and Owen Farrell talk to the press after the 21-13 loss to Wales

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search