Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'It doesn’t look great': Scotland star suffers 'horrendous' injury

By PA
Saracens' Andy Onyeama-Christie leaves the field on a stretcher during the Gallagher Premiership Rugby match between Harlequins and Saracens at The Stoop on October 13, 2024 in London, England. (Photo by Bob Bradford - CameraSport via Getty Images)

Saracens have described the injury suffered by Scotland international Andy Onyeama-Christie against Harelquins as ‘horrendous’.

ADVERTISEMENT

Saracens, who were hit by the serious injury to back-rower Onyeama-Christie early on, were repeatedly repelled by a resolute home side as Quins inflicted a first defeat of the season on their visitors.

Fin Baxter scored the only try of the first half for Harlequins but Hugh Tizard’s score early in the second half levelled the game.

Lennox Anyanwu’s score put Quins back ahead after 52 minutes before Marcus Smith and Alex Lozowski exchanged penalties in the closing stages.

On Onyeama-Christie’s injury, Saracens director of rugby Mark McCall said: “It doesn’t look great, I don’t think.

Fixture
Gallagher Premiership
Harlequins
17 - 10
Full-time
Saracens
All Stats and Data

“I think we’re talking a fracture-dislocation of his ankle, so that’s the big thing today, really, and just so gutted, everybody is.

“He’s had a real tough three years, [with] two broken arms, and for that to happen it’s just horrendous for him, so our thoughts are with him.”

ADVERTISEMENT

On the match itself, McCall added: “I think we had a lot of territory in the game, a lot of entries into their 22 and on the day we just weren’t good enough to convert those into anything.

“Credit their defence as well – they defended like their lives depended on it.

“We had five or six line-outs five metres from their goal line and came away with nothing.

“Obviously, it was 7-0 at half-time, but it felt like we had dominated the first half, certainly from a territory point of view. It’s just our attack wasn’t good enough.”

Harlequins head coach Danny Wilson agreed his side’s defence allowed them to end their hoodoo against London rivals Saracens, who were defeated 17-10 at the Twickenham Stoop.

ADVERTISEMENT

Quins had lost their previous seven Gallagher Premiership fixtures against Sarries, with their two defeats last season being by scorelines of 38-10 and 52-7.

Wilson said: “As a group, we’ve put defence first more often.

“We’ve started meetings with the defence coach [Jason Gilmore], we’ve started [training] sessions with defence, we’ve talked about defence at the end of sessions as deeply as we talk about attack.

“Quins doesn’t want to lose its attacking identity but if we don’t improve our defence, we have to score five tries every week to give us a chance of winning.

“What we’ve done today is hold Saracens to 10 points, so that gives us a chance – OK, we needed to score two [tries] but it had a Test-match feel about it.

“When three points were available, we were taking the three and that’s why it felt like a Test match, normally we’d go straight to the corner.

“So, we’re really pleased from that point of view, not just defensively right across the pitch, but also their maul because we’d talked a lot about maul defence.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 2 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

on the article "Why defensive aggressor Felix Jones will drive new-look England" I said:


"Look at the kick:pass ratio from England’s games under Borthwick:

Italy 20:100

Argentina 50:100

South Africa 53:100

Fiji 24:100

Samoa 22:100

Chile 12:100

Japan 25:100

Argentina 55:100

Fiji 30:100

Ireland 21:100

Wales 24:100

Wales 13:100

Ireland 26:100

France 22:100

Wales 26:100

Italy 23:100

Scotland 18:100

The average is 27:100

The average in games we have won is 28:100

The average in games we have lost is 26:100, but these averages are skewed by the fact that we have tended to kick less and pass more against worse sides

The average in games where we have beaten current top 10 sides is 35:100

The average in games where we have beaten current top 8 sides is 39:100

The average in games where we have beaten current top 7 sides is 53:100

The average in games where we have lost to teams currently ranked lower than us is 20:100"


on the article "Four talking points after England's narrowest-ever win over Italy" I said:


"Look at the kick:pass ratio from England’s last 8 games

Italy 20:100

Argentina 50:100

South Africa 53:100

Fiji 24:100

Samoa 22:100

Chile 12:100

Japan 25:100

Argentina 55:100

So (1) England spread it wide more yesterday than against anyone bar Chile, and (2) all of england’s best performances have been when we kick loads, and in every match where we kick loads we have had a good performance."


"In particular you're neglecting the impact of the type of D Felix Jones was trying to introduce, which demanded most of England's training energy at the time."


I'm not, actually, I'm hyper aware of that fact and of its impact. I think it is because of the defence that England's new attack faltered so much for the first three games, something you ignore when you try to judge England's attack in the six nations by taking an average of either the trys scored or the rucks completed over the whole tournament.


"International coaches don't just pick those styles like sweets from a sweet shop!"

Yeah, I know. England's defence wasn't exactly the same as SA's, but it was similar. England's attack did rely on turnovers more than the Irish system did, but it was still pretty similar to it, and then shifted to something similar-but-not-identitcal to the Labit/Nick Evans systems, which are themselves similar but not identical.

103 Go to comments
f
fl 3 hours ago
The Fergus Burke test and rugby's free market

"So who were these 6 teams and circumstances of Marcus's loses?"


so in the 2023 six nations, England lost both games where Marcus started at 10, which was the games against Scotland and France. The scotland game was poor, but spirited, and the french game was maybe the worst math england have played in almost 30 years. In all 3 games where Marcus didn't start England were pretty good.


The next game he started after that was the loss against Wales in the RWC warmups, which is one of only three games Borthwick has lost against teams currently ranked lower than england.


The next game he's started have been the last 7, so that's two wins against Japan, three losses against NZ, a loss to SA, and a loss to Australia (again, one of borthwicks only losses to teams ranked lower than england).


"I think I understand were you're coming from, and you make a good observation that the 10 has a fair bit to do with how fast a side can play (though what you said was a 'Marcus neutral' statement)"


no, it wasn't a marcus neutral statement.


"Fin could be, but as you've said with Marcus, that would require a lot of change elsewhere in the team 2 years out of a WC"


how? what? why? Fin could slot in easily; its Marcus who requires the team to change around him.


"Marcus will get a 6N to prove himself so to speak"


yes, the 2022 six nations, which was a disaster, just as its been a disaster every other time he's been given the reigns.

224 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Five Springbok rookies who could be blooded in 2025 Five Springbok rookies who could be blooded in 2025
Search