Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

How the Women's Rugby World Cup has proven critic David Corkery wrong

Kendra Cocksedge of New Zealand Women is tackled by Marlie Packer of England Women. Photo: Getty

The women’s world cup is gathering steam in Ireland right now, and whilst it’s already proving to be a cracking tournament a lot of attention is being paid to former Ireland international David Corkery, who wrote a scathing and nonsensical piece decrying the women’s game as “complicated and arduous”, as well as stating that the physicality of rugby is unsuitable behaviour for women. Now, the sensible thing to do here would be to not give such sexist nonsense the oxygen of publicity, but I’ve spent the last few days watching Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt and playing Horizon Zero Dawn so I’m in the mood to smash the god damn patriarchy.

ADVERTISEMENT

Here’s why Corkery is talking s***e:

The Competition:
We’re nearing the end of the tournament and all sorts of interesting dynamics have arisen. Defending champions England are looking good heading into the semi-finals. Wales are already out having ended up in the proverbial group of death but host nation Ireland overcame a scare against a determined Japan side to set up a dynamic final round clash with France, which they ultimately lost. Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau will be extremely pleased to see how his side have been performing and New Zealand are of course running riot because this is rugby after all.

This world cup has been a gripping and fierce competition and it’s still anyone’s guess as to who will emerge victorious. Whilst there haven’t been any major shocks or upsets just yet, as the tournament progresses to the knockout rounds expect to see a more level playing field between the sides, adding the all-important air of unpredictability that makes sport so captivating to watch, regardless of gender.

The Quality:
A lot of the derision pointed at women’s sport is based on its supposed lack of quality. Some people will point to Hong Kong’s 121-0 demolition at the hands of New Zealand or Italy’s woeful kicking skills against England and suggest that women just aren’t good enough to play rugby. However, these iffy performances are not based on a biological essentialism, but rather are symptomatic of an underfunded system which means female athletes face major financial barriers in order to remain competitive.

It’s impossible for players to develop their full potential when they’ve got to juggle training with a full-time job, or when their coaching or training facilities are sub-par.

However, those points aside, the quality of the sport has never been better, and with full professionalism slowly coming into the game expect this upward trend to continue. England’s attacking prowess and clinical skills have demonstrated the benefits of giving players full-time contracts, and further fuelled the justified outrage that followed the announcement that those contracts would be coming to an end.

Ireland mixed silky attacking skills with some brutal forward strength to eventually defeat a Japan side whose defence was nothing short of outstanding at times.

ADVERTISEMENT

Expect the double-figure point deficits to disappear over the next couple of years as more teams’ defensive quality catches up with the attack. With more investment coming in, as well as top-level coaches such as Fiji’s Olympic hero Ben Ryan becoming involved, Women’s Rugby is going from strength to strength on the field. Stick around to watch the later rounds of the tournament and you’ll see performances every bit the equal of any top quality men’s match.

National Pride:
In amongst Corkery’s rambling diatribe was the revelation that he wished the Ireland side well, but still wouldn’t be watching any of the games. He’s missing out. I’ve addressed before how international fixtures create an unparalleled atmosphere of national pride and good-natured hatred of other countries, and this is just as true in the Women’s tournament as the Men’s. Don your shirt adorned with whatever flower/farmyard animal your nationality dictates and belt out the anthems with pride, because the passion on display by players and spectators alike is no less than that of the higher-profile tournament. Plus any excuse to get drunk and cheer your country on tends to go down well.

The Brutality:
Corkery demonstrated some impressive mental gymnastics in his rant by declaring women’s rugby to be simultaneously not as entertaining as the men’s game, whilst also being overly physical and brutal. Apparently, women being “confrontational and aggressive” is “not what god intended”.

Seriously. I don’t know about anyone else, but the aggression and physicality is a huge part of why I love rugby, and some of the hits going in during this year’s tournament have been nothing short of brutal.

ADVERTISEMENT

Of course there are issues of player safety to consider and there are plenty of people who find the whole thing a little too dangerous for their tastes. But if that’s your opinion then rugby as a whole isn’t for you, regardless of who’s playing it. Corkery should just be thankful Meya Bizer isn’t in the USA squad this year.

Conclusion:
Regardless of my amazingly well-written and objectively hilarious arguments here, there will be plenty of people who probably still agree with Corkery and think that the women’s game isn’t worth their time. There’s probably nothing that can be done to convince these people otherwise, which is a real shame.

But regardless of any sexism or misogyny at play, the main thing to take away from this is the simple fact that they’re missing out on some genuinely good rugby, played by phenomenal athletes in a brilliantly exciting tournament. Why not give it a chance?

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

O
Oh no, not him again? 2 hours ago
England internationals disagree on final play execution vs All Blacks

Okay, so we blew it big time on Saturday. So rather than repeating what most people have all ready said, what do I want to see from Borthwick going forward?


Let's keep Marcus Smith on the pitch if he's fit and playing well. I was really pleased with his goal kicking. It used to be his weakness. I feel sympathy for George Ford who hadn't kicked all match and then had a kick to win the game. You hear pundits and commentators commend kickers who have come off the bench and pulled that off. Its not easy. If Steve B continues to substitute players with no clear reason then he is going to get criticised.


On paper I thought England would beat NZ if they played to their potential and didn't show NZ too much respect. Okay, the off the ball tackles certainly stopped England scoring tries, but I would have liked to see more smashing over gainlines and less kicking for position. Yes, I also know it's the Springbok endorsed world cup double winning formula but the Kiwi defence isn't the Bok defence, is it. If you have the power to put Smith on the front foot then why muzzle him? I guess what I'm saying is back, yourself. Why give the momentum to a team like NZ? Why feed the beast? Don't give the ball to NZ. Well d'uh.


Our scrum is a long term weakness. If you are going to play Itoje then he needs an ogre next door and a decent front row. Where is our third world class lock? Where are are realible front row bench replacements? The England scrum has been flakey for a while now. It blows hot and cold. Our front five bench is not world class.


On the positive side I love our starting backrow right now. I'd like to see them stick together through to the next world cup.


Anyway, there is always another Saturday.

7 Go to comments
C
CO 2 hours ago
Scott Robertson responds to criticism over All Blacks' handling errors

Robertson is more a manager of coaches than a coach so it comes down to intent of outcomes at a high level. I like his intent, I like the fact his Allblacks are really driving the outcomes however as he's pointed out the high error rates are not test level and their control of the game is driving both wins and losses. England didn't have to play a lot of rugby, they made far fewer mistakes and were extremely unlucky not to win.


In fact the English team were very early in their season and should've been comfortably beaten by an Allblacks team that had played multiple tests together.


Razor has himself recognised that to be the best they'll have to sort out the crisis levels of mistakes that have really increased since the first two tests against England.


Early tackles were a classic example of hyper enthusiasm to not give an inch, that passion that Razor has achieved is going to be formidable once the unforced errors are eliminated.


That's his secret, he's already rebuilt the passion and that's the most important aspect, its inevitable that he'll now eradicate the unforced errors. When that happens a fellow tier one nation is going to get thrashed. I don't think it will be until 2025 though.


The Allblacks will lose both tests against Ireland and France if they play high error rates rugby like they did against England.


To get the unforced errors under control he's going to be needing to handover the number eight role to Sititi and reset expectations of what loose forwards do. Establish a clear distinction with a large, swarthy lineout jumper at six that is a feared runner and dominant tackler and a turnover specialist at seven that is abrasive in contact. He'll then need to build depth behind the three starters and ruthlessly select for that group to be peaking in 2027 in hit Australian conditions on firm, dry grounds.


It's going to help him that Savea is shifting to the worst super rugby franchise where he's going to struggle behind a beaten pack every week.


The under performing loose forward trio is the key driver of the high error rates and unacceptable turn overs due to awol link work. Sititi is looking like he's superman compared to his openside and eight.


At this late stage in the season they shouldn't be operating with just the one outstanding loose forward out of four selected for the English test. That's an abject failure but I think Robertson's sacrificing link quality on purpose to build passion amongst the junior Allblacks as they see the reverential treatment the old warhorses are receiving for their long term hard graft.


It's unfortunately losing test matches and making what should be comfortable wins into nail biters but it's early in the world cup cycle so perhaps it's a sacrifice worth making.


However if this was F1 then Sam Cane would be Riccardo and Ardie would be heading into Perez territory so the loose forwards desperately need revitalisation through a rebuild over the next season to complement the formidable tight five.

28 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Borthwick, it's time to own up – Andy Goode Borthwick, it's time to own up – Andy Goode
Search