Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Where were you the day Andrew Mehrtens flipped the bird at the Loftus crowd

Dirty old Mehrts

Jamie Wall looks back on the infamous Andrew Mehrtens middle finger incident of 1999.

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s a derby-free weekend of Super Rugby, with teams from every nation involved crossing oceans to complete round 11. One of the more notable is the unbeaten Crusaders visiting Loftus Versfeld Stadium in Pretoria to take on the Bulls. It was in this fixture at the same venue in 1999 that one of Super Rugby’s most infamous acts of poor sportsmanship was perpetrated by a guy who looked like his mum still cut his hair.

These were simpler times for what was then the Super 12. The Crusaders still had the ‘Canterbury’ on the front of their name, and played in the first iteration of an armour-design jersey with white shorts. They were also stacked with All Blacks.

The Northern Bulls had slumped from being a semifinalist in Super 12’s first season to being a veritable shitshow by its fourth. By the time this ninth round fixture came around, the Bulls hadn’t won a game all season. They did however have one of the more memorable South African sponsors in clothing chain Mr. Price, whose arrangement with the teams it sponsors stipulates that the skipper must give his post-match interview in a Donald Trump-MAGA style hat.

[rugbypass-ad-banner id=”1473723684″]

On this day in 1999, the lowly Bulls somehow managed to fight their way to 28-27 lead over the defending champions with time fast running out. But they made the costly mistake of allowing a midfield scrum and opportunity for Andrew Mehrtens to kick a drop goal, which sailed through the rarified high veldt air and between the sticks for a classic snatch-victory-from-the-jaws-of-defeat moment.

Then Mehrtens showed the Pretoria crowd exactly what it meant to him to beat their team.

Maybe someone in the crowd had said something mean to him during the game. Maybe he remembered he had in fact been born in Durban, making the win over the rival Northern team extra special. Or could it be that he was just using his fingers to remind everyone of the final margin of victory?

Whatever the reason, Mehrtens’ raised middle fingers and ‘shove it up ya’ exclamation point to the main stand at Loftus went down in history. Either as the act of a rebellious scamp who just wanted to show a bit of passion, or as a classless piece of foolishness from a senior All Black who really should’ve known better. How you see it probably depends on which team you support.

ADVERTISEMENT

Since social media didn’t really exist yet, the fallout from Mehrts’ salute was confined to newspapers, TV news and reenactments around schools and workplaces the following Monday morning. The first five received no official sanction for the gesture, which these days would probably incur a hefty fine and fake tearful apology.

The scandal didn’t seem to do much to the Crusaders on-field performance, with the team going on to successfully defend their Super Rugby title by beating the Otago Highlanders at the old Carisbrook ground in Dunedin.

Andrew Mehrtens kicked a drop goal in that game, too, but he left his hands in his pockets for the jog back to halfway.

Watch every game of Super Rugby streaming live on rugbypass.com, home of the best online rugby coverage including news, highlights, previews & reviews, live scores, and more!

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

145 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The Waikato young gun solving one of rugby players' 'obvious problems' Injury breeds opportunity for Waikato entrepreneur
Search