Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Death threats after World Cup final force referee to stand down from Test rugby

Referee, Tom Foley checks a video replay during the Gallagher Premiership Rugby match between Gloucester and Newcastle Falcons at Kingsholm Stadium on April 24, 2021 in Gloucester, England. Sporting stadiums around the UK remain under strict restrictions due to the Coronavirus Pandemic as Government social distancing laws prohibit fans inside venues resulting in games being played behind closed doors. (Photo by Dan Mullan/Getty Images)

Referee Tom Foley has announced that he has stepped down from officiating international rugby following the online abuse he received after the World Cup final.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Englishman was the television match official (TMO) for South Africa’s 12-11 win over the All Blacks in Paris at the end of October and has since spoken out about the death threats he received in the wake of the final. This came following a contest which contained three yellow cards and the first ever World Cup final red card shown to All Blacks captain Sam Cane.

Foley follows the final’s match referee Wayne Barnes in retiring, although Barnes has ended his career entirely. Foley will now just officiate in the Gallagher Premiership.

Video Spacer

Rugby Australia: Lowering Tackle Height In Rugby Briefing

Video Spacer

Rugby Australia: Lowering Tackle Height In Rugby Briefing

Foley said: “Having reached the pinnacle in officiating at the Rugby World Cup Final, now feels the right time to take a break from the international game. Over the course of 13 years, I have been fortunate to officiate alongside many dedicated professionals and be involved in some of the greatest games in international rugby.

“However, the pressure and scrutiny I came under after the Rugby World Cup Final, along with a torrent of criticism and abuse online, has helped to reaffirm that this is the right decision for me at this point in my life. While it’s a privilege to be at the heart of some of the sport’s most iconic moments, the increasing levels of vitriol, when the demands and expectation are so high, have led me to this moment.

“Working as an international match official takes you away from home for extended periods, and I am looking forward to spending more time at home with my young children. I am very grateful to my family for their support during my career; without them none of it would have been possible.”

Bill Sweeney, RFU CEO, said: “I would like to thank Tom for his outstanding contribution to international officiating. Tom has officiated in 48 games internationally and is considered one of the best Television Match Officials globally.

“The abuse he has suffered since the Rugby World Cup Final, along with other officials involved in that game, is totally unacceptable and no one should be treated in this way, doing their job for the sport they are so committed to and passionate about.

“We will do everything possible to help guard against the abuse aimed at match officials and players and would urge everyone in our game to consider the role they can play in upholding rugby values.

“Although Tom steps back from Test officiating, we are pleased that he will remain part of the RFU Professional Game Match Officials Group, and that the sport will continue to benefit from his extensive experience domestically.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

71 Comments
D
Donald 338 days ago

By the way, isn’t this headline somewhat misleading, subjective?

I mean, who ‘forced’ the officials to step down? Who put a gun to their heads to do the job in the 1st place?

A whiff of grapeshot? Sticks & stones?

If the officials had had a bit more ownership, gumption, couldn’t they have weathered this ‘abuse’ storm in a teacup?

What ever happened to the stiff upper lip?

Oh, is that it, going whinging, whining to Stephen Jones of The S Times (are The AB’s his main, only job lifeline?) & The GB&R?

D
Donald 338 days ago

If Foley, Barnes had done their jobs properly, particularly in the WC final, would they have not collaborated in bringing abuse upon themselves, their families?

It’s the world they, we live in, with media platforms, governments doing next to nothing to curtail said abuse. Too much dosh, too many click bites? Ask yourselves.

Knowing this however, shouldn’t the 2 aforementioned officials have shouldered their share of responsibility, stop whining & attempting to pass the whole abuse buck into touch?

The heat in the kitchen?

Shades of Boris, Hancock, etc?

R
Red and White Dynamight 350 days ago

Sth Africans laud The Waterboy, the chief whinger extraordinaire. They worship him for his obstinance. The way he ‘accidentally’ leaked his video whinges. How they celebrated at the cherry picked editing. Then they roared again when he ignored his subsequent ban only to re-brand himself as an on-field assistant. How long did they lynch that Kiwi ref after 2011 ? Cheating, its the Sth African way. Gold watches for the ref anyone ? ask Louis, he’s still handing them out willy nilly since ‘95. And then the boetie bleaters turn up online as some self-appointed adjudicator of rugby’s moral code.

A
Another 351 days ago

There appears to be an ongoing conflation between death threats from anonymous online trolls and legitimate criticism of the match officials.

Obviously, online trolls of that nature are contemptible and should be punished but they are difficult to catch because they are difficult to identify. They don’t represent anything other than a tiny minority of unhinged individuals.

This does not conflate with other people who are easy to identify, like entire populations of people, or people who make their own commentary on record. You may disagree with their criticism, but they are doing nothing wrong in making it like anybody else.

Without putting blame on any individual, I think it is fair to say that the officiating in the 2023 WC was problematic and led to a series of questionable actions being made that did affect significant matches.

J
Jonathan 352 days ago

This is Toxic and I bet you “Nigel” is lilkely one of the guys making the threats - Disgusting

G
Gert 352 days ago

NZ landers still defending their wrong actions. Lost all my respect. Always thought the Aussies and Poms did not have sportsmanship. Nz, you should be ashamed of your people. Becoming an embarrassment with the way you defend everything. Grow up Nz.

M
MattJH 352 days ago

Harden up, Tom.

B
Bob 352 days ago

Surely the commentators that have enabled a backlash against the match officials should be held accountable. The one’s that after the World Cup final went our of their way to criticize and question the decisions of impartial match officials. The same match officials that the previous weeks officiated in matches that the NZ team won - no complaints them.

John Kirwan in particular - I watched his talk show after the final - what an embarrasment - he was appointed an Officer of NZ Order of Merit for services to mental health but then he and Wilson unloads on the match officials after every match questioning decision and integrity of the officails.

This I believe in no small way contributed to the game losing two top class match officials after doing their job.
The death threats and harassment from NZ fans, fueled by their commentators wanting to exact revenge for a loss is the problem here. Will Kirwan and Wilson apologize to Barnes and Foley for their actions?
Shame on you John Kirwan.

R
Red and White Dynamight 352 days ago

The 'allegation of “death threats” appear nowhere on record by either the ref Foley or in the official RFU statement. However it does form 100% of this article’s heading. Surely not another example of media chasing headlines and click bait. No ref deserves abuse online or otherwise. Every professional deserves scrutiny however. Barnes is an excellent ref. Foley will not be missed. They both got decisions right and wrong. As do the governing body and rule makers. The Final was a disgrace, the nadir of the slow killing of our game - 50/50 technical calls deciding the result; constant scrum resets; TMO (or bunker ?) encroaching beyond their mandate to find errors; YC/RC’s for unintentional non-malicious ‘foul play’; 1 team playing without the ball (and out-scored in tries by 14 men) and playing for penalties. The ref here - and all refs - are doing their best. It is WR that should bow their heads in shame. What the game needs is not another SH team winning the Webb Ellis but rather the chokerhold of NH officials running WR and ruining our beautiful game. Time for Beaumont and all his gin-swilling mates in London and Dublin to step down and hand the reins to someone who can return the game to the players and fans. Augustin Pichot, the time is NOW.

C
Cameron 352 days ago

Imagine destroying the grand final of the World Cup by doing a terrible job and breaking your own workplace’s rules, and then quitting out of shame but trying to cover it up by blame mean online people. Imagine!

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

287 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Why England's defence of the realm has crumbled without Felix Jones Why England's defence of the realm has crumbled without Felix Jones
Search