Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Defence, discipline, and accuracy: France's Six Nations campaign so far in numbers

EDINBURGH, SCOTLAND - MARCH 30: France players warm up prior to the Guinness Women's Six Nations 2024 match between Scotland and France at Hive Stadium - Edinburgh Rugby Stadium on March 30, 2024 in Edinburgh, United Kingdom. (Photo by Peter Summers/Getty Images)

French rugby is all about flair. It’s about style – whether languid or flamboyant – and about a highly romanticised unpredictability. Whether the offload sticks or self-destructs depends entirely on which France has shown up, but what’s guaranteed is that the nation who invented the ‘champagne’ genre of the game will jouez jouez.

ADVERTISEMENT

The play will sparkle as the panache oozes from every pore, and their match directors – fresh from a broadcast catering feast of duck à l’orange and a lovely red – make coverage decisions best described as ‘whimsical’. In the background, ‘La Marseillaise’ rings out.

The thing is – that’s just not true. Yes, the French have a tendency to produce moments of jaw-dropping ooh-là-là – but they’re just as capable of instances of ouille!-eliciting thunder or accuracy which is simplement formidable.

They’re a chef-d’œuvre boasting a variety of brushstrokes – not just the virtuosic – so, as much as we love those occasions, it’s time to burrow into the hard data available to us, and see exactly what Les Bleues have been about so far in the 2024 Six Nations – ahead of their third round clash with Italy.

Fixture
Womens Six Nations
France Womens
38 - 15
Full-time
Italy Womens
All Stats and Data

The basics. Two played, and two won. A bonus point victory over the Irish in their opener – 38 – 17 – before a scrape past Scotland, 15 to 5, in Edinburgh. Italy, Wales, and England to come.

53 points scored – seven tries, six conversions, and a pair of penalty kicks – which is a tally only the Red Roses have surpassed. On the flip side, they’ve conceded three tries, two conversions, and a three-pointer – a total of 22 bettered only by, you guessed it, John Mitchell’s table-toppers.

France have finished second for the last four editions of the championship, and it’s a position they know well when it comes to the in-tournament statistics – where they’re generally nipping at English heels. The important numbers are those which deviate from that: the metrics in which they’re some way off the Packer-set pace, or where they might have the edge on their cross-Channel rivals.

ADVERTISEMENT

In attack, they’re growing into games slowly – tending to finish with a flourish – whilst the Red Roses take a quarter to find their feet, but are then consistently inexorable.

Five of Les Bleues’ seven tries have originated from a lineout, but that doesn’t necessarily make them predictable: they’re as comfortable biding their time as they are launching strikes moves, with scores taking everything from one to double-digit phases.

It’s vital that they finish these, given how much opportunity they earn themselves: no one has as much ball as the French. Top for possession and enjoying the most territory by some margin, they want to play avec le ballon wherever possible – and they’re pretty good at doing that: enjoying the lion’s share against both Ireland and the Scots, despite topping the naughty step for ‘bad passes’, and affecting the second-fewest turnovers.

What will be a concern is conversion. They had 57% possession and two-thirds territory against Scott Bemand’s side in round one, but averaged 2.2 points per penetration of the Irish 22. Their opponents? Starved of ball and field position, but slamming 7 on the board each time they made it into France’s red zone – and not once leaving that hallowed turf empty-handed.

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

A week on, Scotland were much less ruthless – managing just 2.5 points per entry – but their heroic defence hammered France’s own efficiency, and they slunk off with a measly 15 points from 15 visits. For clarity: a point per foray is terrible.

Defensively, there’s plenty for Gaëlle Mignot and David Ortiz’s charges to hang their berets upon. Conceding three tries over two matches is no small feat, and they’ve missed the fewest tackles in the championship.

They also stepped up between rounds, which is key – it’s crucial that they build as the tournament progresses – missing fewer tackles, conceding fewer offloads, and halting carriers on the gain line more frequently.

Discipline is intrinsically linked to defence, too – given how it prevents and alleviates pressure – and Les Bleues have been squeaky clean so far. Only Ireland have conceded fewer penalties, and there’s not been a single card brandished at a Frenchwoman in 2024.

Set piece-wise? Mixed. Everyone’s struggling at the line out – the average success is 75% – so France’s 79% is towards the top of the pile, but they’ll be concerned by the way it collapsed against Scotland, when they lost five of 17 throws. At the scrum, they’re absolute teacher’s pets – with a 100% record on their own feed. They’re not exactly bullying opponents here – they’ve won just the one penalty (England have conjured up five) – but it’s a rock-solid platform for them.

What about that key battleground – the breakdown? ‘Secure but slow’ is the headline: seven rucks lost so far – as few as anyone – but a ruck speed which places them down in fourth – and light years behind England’s blistering 2.82s average. What Les Bleues have mastered is the defensive side of proceedings on the floor: no one makes life stodgier for their opponents, and they’re devious at forming and defusing mauls.

They’re 80% off the tee, which isn’t quite as pinpoint as Ireland or Wales, but is almost twice as accurate as the reigning champions. Come Bordeaux, this could be massive: England haven’t taken a single shot at goal, and have missed nine of their 16 conversion attempts – whilst France have mishit just two kicks all tournament, and knowing they can rely on this option transforms the complexion of any territorial battle.

That might be a point for the blue team, but what’s a coup for the women in white is how much more dominant they are ball-in-hand. The French lead the carry count by 272 to 242, but trail considerably when it comes to the return on those – and have grappled 200 fewer metres post-contact. 40% of England carries are dominant: less than 20% of French ones are.

The prospect of Romane Menager running at Marlie Packer is as thrilling as it is terrifying – and surely a production Marvel are working on as I write – but the evidence suggests the world number ones will rule the roost, come the meaty stuff.

Worth noting, and invaluable in the context of a relentless campaign, is that France’s performances are squad-wide efforts. The load’s shared around this youthful squad, with a variety of players bringing a variety of USPs to the table. 

Madoussou Fall is their most industrious tackler, but Manaé Feleu is the one who does the best sledgehammer impression (and wins all the lineouts). Marine Manager has an eye for a line-break, whilst her twin Romane has contributed a mammoth 33 carries, with Assia Khalfaoui and Gabrielle Vernier not far behind. Emilie Boulard and Lina Queyroi have made up the metres ball-in-hand and with the boot, and – of the 14 most prolific offloaders so far – nine are French.

Ridiculously, that last statistic brings us back to where we started – this idea of France as the egg-chasing universe’s Harlem Globetrotters. They’re not – partly because there’s much more to their game than that, but mostly – having looked at these numbers – because they need to earn the right to play with such verve and elan: through dominant carries, quicker subsequent ball, a reliable line-out, and developing the attacking efficiency to build score lines which allow them to cut loose. You can’t ice a cake which has collapsed mid-bake, and good luck draping tinsel over a brittle Christmas tree.

There’s an enthralling arms race taking place – as Mitchell’s England sprinkle stardust onto their trademark grunt, and France hustle to reinforce the foundations of their offloading temple – and the finish line’s looming into view. Bordeaux beckons, where all these numbers will culminate in the only two which matter – those on the scoresheet as that final whistle sounds – and they fire up the confetti cannons…

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
C
Courtney 251 days ago

Before reaching the end of the first paragraph I suspected who the author was. Great article again and loving the allegorising and analogies.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

M
Mzilikazi 2 hours ago
Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?

Great read on a fascinating topic, Nick. Thanks as always.


My gut feel is that Joe Schmidt won't carry on through to the next RWC. He is at the stage, and age, in his life , that a further two years in a very high pressure coaching job would not be a good thing for either himself or his family. The fact that he remains based in Taupo seems a significant pointer, I would have thought. I believe he has a round trip of 12 hrs driving just to get on a plane to Australia.


Amongst the many good things Joe Schmidt has achieved to this point is that the WB's are now a more enticing prospect to coach going forward.


Tbh, the only Australian coach I would see stepping up and developing the WB's further would be Les Kiss. He has far more in his CV than any other Australian. He now has 23 years of coaching Union,starting with a defence role with the Boks, then back to Australia with the Waratahs. Overseas again for nine years in Ireland, which included 5 years as defence coach with the national team, during which he was interim head coach for two games, both wins. His last years in Ireland were with Ulster, even then a team beginning a decline. So that spell was his least successful. Finally the spell with London Irish, where I felt Kiss was doing very well, till the club collapsed financially.


Of the other Australian options, Dan McKellar has a lot to prove post the year with Leicester. Stephen Larkham has not, in my view, yet shown outstanding qualities as a coach. Nether man has anything close to Kiss's experience. Some may see this as being harsh on both men, ignoring good work they have done. But is how I see it.


Looking outside Australia, I would see Vern Cotter as a strong possibility, if interested. His time with Scotland was outstanding. Ronan O'Gara, I would think, might well be another possibility, though he has no international experience. Jake White ? Maybe .

74 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Japan shock the world to win title over New Zealand and Australia Japan shock the world to win title
Search