Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Despite loss one Wallaby has been singled out for lavish praise

(Photo by Getty Images)

Matt Toomua has received universal praise from fans and pundits in Australia after his heroic performance in the loss against Wales on Sunday.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Melbourne Rebels back entered the fray on 44 minutes, replacing Bernard Foley, with the Wallabies trailing 26-8. Within seconds of being on, he made a break down the left side of the field, which ultimately led to Dane Haylett-Petty’s try and Australia’s comeback.

The difference Toomua made once he came on was ostensibly clear, as the Wallabies played with significantly more tempo and pinned Wales in their own half for much of the second half.

In the space of 25 minutes, the former Leicester Tigers utility back took the Wallabies within one point of Wales, although Warren Gatland’s side showed just enough to pull through 29-25 in the end.

Video Spacer

However, the contrast in performance between Foley and Toomua has been noted by many Australians, who have questioned why Michael Cheika ever opted to play with the New South Wales Waratahs flyhalf. Foley has always been a conservative but popular option for Cheika, but he struggled to get Australia going in the first half. However, credit must be given to him, as he orchestrated Adam Ashley-Cooper’s first half try with a cross-field kick in what was Australia’s only chance of the half.

But the stark contrast in performance in the second half once Foley went off does not bode well for the 70-cap standoff for the rest of the Rugby World Cup, or indeed his international career.

Christian Lealiifano had been the prefered choice at ten for the Rugby Championship, but Cheika went for the player he has relied upon for the majority of his tenure, but it backfired majorly.

The surprising thing is that Toomua did not even need to do a lot to change the game. He was just more direct when he carried the ball and added a bit more urgency into the play. The 29-year-old is probably more comfortable as a centre, but he undoubtedly improved Australia’s lacklustre display. He was also helped by the addition of Nic White at scrumhalf, but he had already started to make inroads with Will Genia on the field too.

ADVERTISEMENT

It was an impressive performance, which came close to saving the game for the Wallabies, and this was the reaction on Twitter:

https://twitter.com/LvonFeuerbach/status/1178251591758958592?s=20
https://twitter.com/Jack_Quigley/status/1178233831742156802?s=20
https://twitter.com/Budulnya/status/1178233344401629184?s=20
https://twitter.com/waratahjesus/status/1178280973156282368?s=20
https://twitter.com/BKolia/status/1178246164321198080?s=20
https://twitter.com/RobSutton22/status/1178235929481355264?s=20
https://twitter.com/lucasholmes12/status/1178240398902226944?s=20
https://twitter.com/nightterror92/status/1178245235781955584?s=20
https://twitter.com/thornado_/status/1178233489335959552?s=20
https://twitter.com/WayneLongbottom/status/1178354225010446336?s=20

This leaves the Wallabies with a tough route for the rest of the RWC, as they look set to finish second in Pool D. That means they are likely to face Pool C favourites England in the quarter-final with the likelihood of facing the All Blacks in the semi-final should they pass that test.

The only positive for Australia is the flyhalf debate has been put to bed, as both Lealiifano and Toomua now seem ahead of Foley for the rest of the competition. If they are not, Cheika will be on the receiving end of a lot of criticism.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

KOKO Show | July 22nd | Full Throttle with Brisbane Test Review and Melbourne Preview

New Zealand v South Africa | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

USA vs England | Men's International | Full Match Replay

France v Argentina | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

Lions Share | Episode 4

Zimbabwe vs Namibia | Rugby Africa Cup Final | Full Match Replay

USA vs Fiji | Women's International | Full Match Replay

Tattoos & Rugby: Why are tattoos so popular with sportspeople? | Amber Schonert | Rugby Rising Locker Room Season 2

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

N
NH 1 hour ago
'The Wallabies need to convert much better - or Melbourne could be much worse'

Nice one as always Brett. I think the stats hide a bit of the dominance the lions had, and they would look alot worse in that first half when the game was more in the balance. You mention it here but I think it hasn’t been talked about enough was the lineout. The few times the wallabies managed to exit their half and get an opportunity to attack in the 1st half, the lineout was lost. This was huge in terms of lions keeping momentum and getting another chance to attack, rather than the wallabies getting their chance and to properly ‘exit’ their half. The other one you touch on re “the will jordan bounce of the ball” - is kick chase/receipt. I thought that the wallabies kicked relatively well (although were beaten in this area - Tom L rubbish penalty kicks for touch!), but our kick receipt and chase wasn’t good enough jorgenson try aside. In the 1st half there was a moment where russell kicked for a 50:22 and potter fumbled it into touch after been caught out of position, lynagh makes a similar kick off 1st phase soon after and keenan is good enough to predict the kick, catch it at his bootlaces and put a kick in. That kick happened to go out on the full but it was a demonstration on the difference in positioning etc. This meant that almost every contested kick that was spilled went the way of the lions, thats no accident, that is a better chase, more urgency, more players in the area. Wallabies need to be better in who fields their kicks getting maxy and wright under most of them and Lynagh under less, and the chase needs to be the responsibility of not just one winger but a whole group of players who pressure not just the catch but the tackle, ruck and following phase.

17 Go to comments
J
JW 1 hour ago
Competing interests and rotated squads: What the 'player welfare summer' is really telling us

Thanks for the further background to player welfare metrics Nick.


Back on the last article I noted that WR is now dedicating a whole section in their six-point business plan to this topic. It also noted that studies indicated 85-90% of workload falls outside of playing. So in respect to your point on the classification of ‘involvements’ included even subs with a low volume of minutes, it actually goes further, to the wider group of players that train as if they’re going to be required to start on the weekend, even if they’re outside the 23. That makes even the 30-35 game borderline pale into insignificance.


No doubt it is won of the main reasons why France has a quota on the number of one clubs players in their International camps, and rotate in other clubs players through the week. The number of ‘invisible’ games against a player suggests the FFRs 25 game limit as more appropriate?


So if we take it at face value that Galthie and the FFR have got it right, only a dozen players from the last 60 international caps should have gone on this tour. More players from the ‘Scotland 23’ than the more recent 23.


The only real pertinent question is what do players prefer more, health or money? There are lots of ethical decisions, like for instance whether France could make a market like Australia’s where their biggest rugby codes have yearly broadcast deals of 360 and 225 million euros. They do it by having a 7/8 month season.

68 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Erasmus invites 3 U20 stars into Bok squad as multiple RWC winners miss out Erasmus names 3 U20 stars in Bok squad as many RWC winners miss out