Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Diamond calls on World Rugby to act after 'ridiculous' DVDM ban

(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Steve Diamond is still furious over the three-game ban given to the red-carded Duhan van der Merwe earlier this month, the Worcester boss calling on World Rugby to stop matches getting constantly disfigured by red cards. The Warriors winger was sent off on March 5 in a Gallagher Premiership match at London Irish and the resulting ban ruled him out of Scotland’s closing two matches in this year’s Guinness Six Nations. 

ADVERTISEMENT

After using a handoff when attacking for Worcester, van der Merwe received a red card for “reckless or dangerous play” and at his disciplinary hearing, he accepted that foul play had occurred but questioned whether the red card threshold had been met.  

The panel upheld the red card decision and van der Merwe received a three-week ban which he failed to overturn on appeal. However, having since completed the World Rugby coaching intervention programme, he is free to return for Worcester in the league at local rivals Gloucester on Friday night after getting the final match of his three-game suspension scratched. 

Video Spacer

Taking on one of the top university teams in the UK | John Okafor VLOG | Episode 2

Video Spacer

Taking on one of the top university teams in the UK | John Okafor VLOG | Episode 2

Harsher penalties have been introduced to protect players and lower the tackle height but Diamond is adamant more work needs to be done – with one option being making a red card for certain offences earn just a 20-minute period off the pitch rather than a complete exclusion.

 It comes after the Six Nations featured controversial incidents such as Charlie Ewels, the  England and Bath lock, being sent off after 82 seconds of the game with Ireland for head-on-head contact.

Related

Diamond also pointed to Worcester’s recent win over Exeter that saw Chiefs centre Tom Hendrickson sent off for a high tackle and Jannes Kirsten cited for a dangerous ruck clearout. Both received three-game bans and both were allowed to apply for tackle school. “There has to be some decisions (by Word Rugby) made moving forward,” reckoned the Worcester coach. 

“When you think of what happened in our game against Exeter two weeks ago when there was a clear clash of heads and there was a citing and clear take-out of someone on the deck. The same punishment is dished out to Duhan for, let’s be honest, catching someone with a passive hand movement which is ridiculous. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“World Rugby have to do something about it and while we all want the safety issues to be in place, something (must be done), whether that is a 20-minute period off the pitch (for an offence) and then they come back on, because it is ruined if the game goes down to 14 men. There are lots of them at the moment.

“If we went through with a fine toothcomb we would have someone sent off at every ruck. It could become an even bigger nightmare than it is. It is not the referees’ fault because the lawmakers make the laws and the referees have to input them and it is worrying for a contact sport.”

Meanwhile, Diamond confirmed that centre Ollie Lawrence was still “a couple of weeks” away from returning from a serious hamstring injury, adding that he doesn’t believe it would be sensible for the player to be rushed back for England’s summer tour to Australia.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes
Search