Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Did NZR jump the gun with no games for the All Blacks on the horizon?

(Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images)

Talk about anti-climactic.

I don’t make a habit of feeling bad for professional rugby players. Theirs is a pretty good life, complete with a healthy pay packet and all the other trimmings that go with being young and successful.

But it’s hard not to spare a thought for Alex Hodgman, Caleb Clarke, Hoskins Sotutu, Cullen Grace, Will Jordan and Tupou Vaa’i. After the joy of Father’s Day and of telling their loved ones about their sudden elevation to the All Blacks comes the reality of Mitre 10 Cup training.

What was the hurry here? Why has Ian Foster even named a 35-strong All Blacks’ squad?

We assume the team will play this year, but when exactly? October? November? December? Any later than that and it’ll be 2021.

All the best-laid plans to stage The Rugby Championship in New Zealand appear as if they’ll fall over. Between our COVID-19 situation, and those in South Africa and Argentina, it’s apparent that hosting the four-team tournament is now highly unlikely.

That leaves just Australia as a potential foe, with two tests on either side of the Tasman the anticipated outcome.

An announcement of some sort is expected at the end of this week but, given the various coronavirus protocols that have to be observed, it then looks as if it will be a further month before any All Blacks’ footy gets played.

So why the rush? Why name 35 players now when (at least those who are fit enough) are all off to play provincial rugby for a couple of weeks?

Would it not have made more sense to simply name the team then?

When those seven new caps look back on their life, Sunday will be right up there. With luck, there’ll be marriages and births to look forward to – maybe even a Rugby World Cup final win – but being picked in the All Blacks for the first time will remain as special as any of them.

https://www.instagram.com/p/CE0QdvNBRaJ/

Your heart would be made of stone if you weren’t moved by the footage of Vaa’i, for instance, sharing the news with his family.

Only his immediate reward is not a test cap. In fact it’s not even the generous fee players earn by being in All Blacks’ camp. No, he’s off to Inglewood to play Taranaki against Bay of Plenty.

Whether they can see it or not, New Zealand Rugby (NZR) have rained on these players’ parades. They’ve taken a moment of immense satisfaction and celebration and diminished it a little.

Mind you, premature and unnecessary calls are becoming an NZR specialty. Again, whether the powers that be like it or not, the decision to appoint Sam Cane All Blacks’ captain looks increasingly optimistic.

We’re at the point of having to collectively cross our fingers where Cane’s concerned, given his history of concussion. He might be symptom-free again – and set to play for the Steamers on Sunday – but for how long?

New Zealand’s 2019 player of the year, Ardie Savea, has to play somewhere, though, and Cane’s openside flanker spot might be it. Looking at the other loose forwards picked: Sotutu, Akira Ioane, Dalton Papalii, Cullen Grace and Shannon Frizell, there’s plenty of blokes who can play blindside or No.8, but not so many 7s.

Given his immense ability, sitting Savea on the subs’ bench would seem a bit of a nonsense.

As for the captaincy, well, it’s not hard to imagine Sam Whitelock will assume that role at some stage this season.

Once the team is able to play, of course.

Until then, you still wonder what the point of North v South was.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

B
Bob Salad II 44 minutes ago
'England's blanket of despair feels overdone - they are not a team in freefall'

1. RFU must scrape the eligibility rules, England's coach must be able to pick all players regardless of where they play.


I don't think this is going to happen and personally, I don't believe it should. The whole new Enhanced Player Squad (EPS) contracts can only be awarded to EQPs signed to Premiership teams (not sure about Championship sides). The Prem clubs are not going to be agreeable to any changes that see their best players heading off to France/Japan etc. Personally, I believe the Prem should be ring-fenced further with even tighter restrictions on the number of foreign players clubs can have on their books. If the RFU are serious about development pathways, then the Prem and Championship should be establish as the best nurseries for developing emerging EQP.


2. SB and coaching team must improve their coaching, selection and impact/substitutions.


Completely agree. Really disappointed that we're unlikely to see more of the England A/U20 cohort against Japan this week. Seems a perfect opportunity to get some of them on off the bench for 20-mins or so. The disparity between the starting 15 and the bench has been one of the biggest issues this Autumn.


3. England need to change their captain, young props to be given game time, inside centre to be introduced along with a younger fast fullback.


Another hot topic atm., though I'm not sure who you'd replace him with. Someone, somewhere mentioned making George Ford captain, but that creates a whole other set of issues regarding you-know-who. Agree about looking at some alternative 12/13 options. Can't see Borthwick drifting too far from Furbank at FB with Steward covering for high-kicking opposition.

5 Go to comments
F
Flankly 2 hours ago
'England's blanket of despair feels overdone - they are not a team in freefall'

England have all the makings of a good team. We know that, and we have known that for years (including when Eddie was delivering disappointing results). But sometimes the positive comments about under-performing teams sound like describing a darts player as "fantastic, aside from their accuracy".


Its a trivial observation to say that scoring more points and preventing more points against you would result in better outcomes. And points difference does not mean much either, as it is generally less than 5 points with top teams. Usain Bolt would win the 100m sprint by 200 milliseconds (approximately two blinks of an eye), but that doesn't mean the others could easily beat him.


Also, these kinds of analyses tend to talk about how the team in question would just need to do X, Y and Z to win, but assume that opponents don't make any changes themselves. This is nonsense, as it is always the case that both teams go away with a list of work-ons. If we're going to think about what would have happened if team A had made that tackle, kicked that goal or avoided that penalty, the n let's think about what would have happened if team B had passed to that overlap, avoided that card, or executed that lineout maul.


There are lots of things that England can focus on for improvement, but for me the main observation is that they have not been able to raise their game when it matters. Playing your best game when it counts is what makes champions, and England have not shown that. And, for me, that's a coaching thing.


I expected Borthwick to build a basics-first, conservative culture, minimizing mistakes, staying in the game, and squeezing out wins against fancier opponents and game plans. It's not that he isn't building something, but it has taken disappointingly long, not least if you compare it to Australia since Schmidt took over, or SA after Rassie took over.

5 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Lightweight' Premiership not preparing England players for Test rugby 'Lightweight' Premiership not preparing England players for Test rugby
Search