Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Disappointed': Ex-All Blacks underwhelmed by inaugural Super Round event

By Sam Smith
(Photo by Kelly Defina/Getty Images)

A pair of former All Blacks have expressed their disappointment of Super Rugby Pacific’s inaugural Super Round event in Melbourne over the weekend.

ADVERTISEMENT

AAMI Park hosted all five of Super Rugby Pacific’s round 10 matches, the first cross-border fixtures of the season between New Zealand and Australian teams, in the first-ever iteration of the Super Round.

Those matches were played in front of half-empty crowds, though, as Super Rugby Pacific attracted a reported figure of only 30,000 attendees across three days of matches.

Video Spacer

What the All Blacks squad could look like halfway through Super Rugby Pacific | Aotearoa Rugby Pod

Video Spacer

What the All Blacks squad could look like halfway through Super Rugby Pacific | Aotearoa Rugby Pod

Concerns have since been raised about public interest in the event, and Super Rugby Pacific as a whole, with All Blacks great Jeff Wilson taking aim at the quality of rugby that was seen in Melbourne from Friday through to Sunday.

Speaking on The Breakdown, Wilson said he was left underwhelmed by the maiden Super Round event, saying it failed to live up to his on-field and off-field expectations.

“I’m disappointed about that, the fact that this was supposed to be a Super Round, there was supposed to be big crowds,” Wilson told The Breakdown.

“The upper tier was empty. I’m assuming they tried to sell tickets for it. I went into this weekend excited, looking forward to the contest.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I thought there was a lot of penalties, I thought there was a lot of scrums. Once again, we had ill-discipline. I’m hoping it’s going to improve between all of these sides going forward.”

Wilson’s views were shared by former All Blacks loose forward Steven Bates, who told The Breakdown that Super Rugby Pacific officials should have resorted to giving away free tickets if necessary in order to provide a sell-out spectacle.

“I think as a showpiece for a Super Round, even if you’ve got to give away tickets, this is a showpiece and the stands had to be full,” Bates said.

“They’re trying to make a mark, they’re trying to make an imprint, and you look at the cameras, I was at home and the wife goes, ‘There’s a good crowd’, and the cameras pan out and then you see the top tier.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Even if they had to give away tickets, I think they had to, to say ‘We are here, this is a Super Round, look how many people want to watch a game’.”

Melbourne’s poor Super Round turnout paled in comparison to that of the AFL match between Richmond and Melbourne on Sunday evening, which drew a crowd of more than 70,000 at the Melbourne Cricket Ground.

The Melbourne Storm’s annual Anzac Day NRL clash against the Warriors at AAMI Park on Monday is also expected to attract a typically large crowd, illustrating the disparity of interest between rugby union and its rival codes in the Victorian capital.

Nevertheless, Wilson found one positive from the Super Round in the performance of the Fijian Drua, who impressed against the league-leading Blues despite falling to a 35-18 defeat on Saturday evening.

“I did enjoy the Fijian Drua, the way that they played, the enterprise, they took the Blues head on,” Wilson told The Breakdown.

“They weren’t good enough to get a win, but they were the one, for me, highlight out of the weekend in terms of the fact that they were there to compete and they were there to do the best they could, and it wasn’t quite enough.

“Blues, though, showed the signs of a really, really good team.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

16 Comments
h
hamish 876 days ago

When will the kiwis stop moaning about rugby audiences/ quality in Aus? The sheer stupidity of these statements in the same article as “70,000 for AFL” and what turned out to be a near sell out for NRL powerhouse Melbourne Storm who posses enough talent to power 2 NRL teams.

Australia is THE MOST COMPETITIVE WINTER SPORTS MARKET IN THR WORLD… Jon O’Neill circa 2006 (ish?)
Here’s the thing; we know our teams aren’t what they were, we know the spectacle wasn’t what it should be… but you know what, the big growth market IS Australia. If NZ is keen to see this product improve then they need to accept AFL and NRL are their biggest competitors now. Grow up boys, you were a big fish in a small pond and now the tide has turned… perhaps you could think about a system which moves your abundance of talent around the teams ( a super draft anyone?) You’d get improved rugby and better product to sell whilst staving off a European/ Japanese interest and player stays in SH for All Blacks Selection.

I mean, what’s the alternative to SR Pacific? Where does NZ go? Japan? Unlikely b/c as much as the Japanese are improving the quality argument doesn’t stack up. South Africa made their move north and it seems to be a better fit for them. So if you agree that geography will play a major part in this scenario, then the kiwi has better start thinking about this in collaboration with RA because if SR doesn’t pan out, they’ll find NZ is a pretty long way from everywhere else on the planet…..

D
Denis 876 days ago

Get real. I go to Melbourne often and have sat in many a bar in Melbourne watching rugby on a small screen in the corner while the throngs watched an AFL game on the big screen. Rugby is a minor sport there, however I though it was a great weekend of rugby and the crowd numbers about what could be expected. The joyousness of the Fijian women's win was much more worth talking about than all of the rest of this whinging

G
Graeme 876 days ago

Why in the hell would the powers that be ever think that having the event in Melbourne where rugby is, at best, a 4th market sport, behind AFL, The Storm and two soccer teams. It was a poor business decision and did the games and the sport no favours. Wake up SANZAAR.

i
isaac 878 days ago

How about let cities bid to host the super round d...Melbourne was never a good choice anyway...sydney or Brisbane would have seen bigger crowds...even eden park or Suva could have had a bigger crowd for the three days....it would be better for cities to bid to host the super round

D
David 878 days ago

Crusaders skill level deplorable!

S
Sunny 878 days ago

The problem with rugby is the referee's, their performances have been substandard, and well below the quality of referee's in Northern Hemisphere. Until Rugby Referee Unions In NZ, SA, and Australia can put potential Referees through a schooling system that teaches referees how to referee a game of rugby instead of how to coach player's, which is a coaches job.

g
gefitz 878 days ago

Biggest complaint about the game, warranted or not, is that it's slow or takes too long. So the gameplan is to cram 3-4 matches a day into one venue and sell tickets to that? Puzzling. Union (worldwide) needs help and I really don't know what that help looks like.

j
jaze 878 days ago

It was so dull - all the games. Lack of quality - slow - no atmosphere. How many times did the crusaders drop the ball? Tackling optional. It’s better watching northern rugby - and that’s bloody awful. Rugby needs to sort its product out.

B
Bob 878 days ago

55,000 spectators watched the Stormers beat Glasgow Warriors in Cape Town stadium.

A
Andrew 878 days ago

Idiotic place for a super round. Should have been in Brisbane if you wanted a crowd.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jonathan Foster 37 minutes ago
Scott Lawrence: 'I think the forward pass for the Fiji try was a pivotal moment in the game'

In this match, Fiji’s performance was exceptional, and the statistics reflect that they were the superior team on the day.


For instance:


Possession: Fiji controlled 59% of the possession during the match, while the USA only had 41% (RugbyPass, 2024). This allowed Fiji to apply constant pressure on USA’s defense and create more opportunities for scoring.


Territory: Fiji spent 64% of the match in USA’s half, keeping the Americans under sustained pressure (World Rugby, 2024).


Offensive Play: Fiji made 7 line breaks, compared to USA’s 3. In addition, Fiji completed 12 offloads while USA only managed 5, highlighting Fiji's superior attacking ability and ball handling (World Rugby, 2024).


Scrums and Rucks: Fiji was dominant in the scrums, winning 100% of their own scrums (8 out of 8), whereas USA only won 71% of theirs (5 out of 7).


Additionally, Fiji won 6 turnovers compared to USA’s 2 (ESPN, 2024). This scrummaging and breakdown superiority was a critical factor in controlling the game.


Additionally, while forward passes can be contentious, it’s important to note that USA was also guilty of making 3 forward passes during the match, which resulted in lost opportunities and turnovers (RugbyPass, 2024).


These key errors disrupted momentum and contributed to their inability to maintain a sustained attack.


References

ESPN. (2024). Fiji vs USA match report. Retrieved from https://www.espn.com/rugby/match


RugbyPass. (2024). Scott Lawrence on the Fiji match and forward pass controversy. Retrieved from https://www.rugbypass.com/news


World Rugby. (2024). Fiji triumphs over USA in a thrilling encounter. Retrieved from https://www.world.rugby.com

0 Go to comments
J
JW 2 hours ago
‘Did Conrad really score that many’: Rieko Ioane dismisses All Blacks drought

Indeed, but I also appreciate how Razor now has him covering the backfield more. Are they conflicting uses? Who was it that covered the Arg game, John(?), no it was a YTer (squidge?) suggested Jordies role was to chase and support the wing for a tap back.


That turnover try was actually a great example of were Jordies boot could have been used for territory instead of attacking (contestable). Hansen talking again about 'learnings' about what part of the field they want to play in. I would have thought that would be a basic principle about how the coaches want to play and it would be a bit late now to be learning that.


Nevrtheless we wait and see. One Barretts carrying though I'd suggest he only has a mandate to bring some physicality, not in how he does it. You can see how out of kilter he gets when he tries to do anything other than a simple cart up and pop. Just look at least week when he had two players on the outside to hit in multiple ways and he just indecisively takes the tackle before giving a poor overhead pop. That he still got the pass away hints at what he is "capable of" but as you saw, with free license, its just far off the mark. I've decided Rieko is my 12 from now on. I'd like Jordie to remain primarly at 12 at the Hurricans, as I feel that's were his best alround game can be kept in good shape, and you never know perhaps he will fill into the position after a while, but I'd like to try other centers essentially. But yes, if Razor/Hansen can get both him and Dmac humming in partnership they could also essentially cover many of the fb roles which aren't Jordans strength. Also obv happy to see Rieko tried on the wing just now I think that's more likely to fail than a Rieko/Proctor midfield.

17 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Why Rassie Erasmus should cull some Boks veterans for 2027 Why Rassie Erasmus should cull some Boks veterans for 2027
Search