Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Disappointing' - IRFU hit back after 62 players sign scathing letter of complaint

PA

The IRFU have hit back at a group of over 60 women’s players who have penned a withering letter to the Irish government, complaining about the national union.

ADVERTISEMENT

Irish sports’ website The42.ie broke the story earlier today and report that the group of current and high profile former players have voiced their concern at how the women’s programme has been managed by the union.

The group have requested that the Irish government act as in an oversight capacity in relation to two independent reviews into the women’s game that are currently taking place.

Video Spacer

All Black & Bristol Bear John Afoa joins the panel | RugbyPass Offload | Episode 13

Video Spacer

All Black & Bristol Bear John Afoa joins the panel | RugbyPass Offload | Episode 13

They said that the women’s side of the game had undergone “multiple cycles of substandard commitment from the union” and that the Dublin-based union had provided “inequitable and untrustworthy leadership”.

The group said they had lost “all trust and confidence in the IRFU”.

The women’s national team failed to qualify for the 2021 Rugby World Cup – a result that shocked the wider rugby community given Ireland’s status as Tier 1 rugby nation.

The IRFU has appointed former Welsh international Amanda Bennett as an independent consultant to conduct an review into the “preparation, participation and performance” of the Ireland Women’s XV during the failed RWC 2021 qualifying campaign.

In October the IRFU said that the ‘overarching aim will be to learn from any issues that led to Ireland failing to qualify and to identify areas of improvement that will support future international campaigns. This review is scheduled to take eight-nine weeks.’

ADVERTISEMENT

A second review, titled the ‘Women in Rugby Action Plan’ review, will be completed in early 2022.

The IRFU have today described the letter which was signed by the 62 players as ‘disappointing’.

A statement reads: “The IRFU is aware of a letter sent to the Minister for Sport re Irish Women’s Rugby and refutes the overall tenor of the document which questions the IRFU’s commitment to, and leadership of, the women’s game in Ireland.

“It is disappointing that this group should chose [sic] now to come out with a series of allegations, given all involved in Irish Rugby are fully aware that two well resourced, independent reviews are in train and it is from these reviews that lessons, based on fact, can be learned and the foundations built which will serve the women’s game well for future generations.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The IRFU is fully committed to the development of the women’s game based on a sustainable structure, from grassroots up to international level. This is evident from the level of absolute commitment already in place by volunteers in clubs throughout the country, the IRFU rugby development team who are working tirelessly to bring the game to ever widening playing audiences and the committee who have sanctioned ever increasing budgets in support of the women’s game.

“The responsible approach would be to allow these reviews progress and conclude their work independently, without attempts to influence their work through outside interference.

“For the benefit of those who may not be aware and to balance, in some way, the opinions promoted in this recent letter it is important to reiterate that the IRFU has already publicly announced and set in train an independent review into, what was for all in Irish Rugby, players, team management, IRFU committee and executives, the hugely disappointing failure of our women’s senior international team to qualify for the Women’s Rugby World Cup in 2023.

Women's Rugby World Cup
A disappointed Anna Caplice of Ireland at the 2017 Women’s Rugby World Cup (Photo By Oliver McVeigh/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

“It is important that the integrity and independence of this review, which includes feedback from players, is not compromised in any way. The Union is already publicly committed to relying on the findings of that report as it plots future campaigns.”

“They go on to say that all ‘understand the importance of the international game in this matrix but of equal importance is the development of a structure for the long-term growth of the game at grassroots around club players and young girls coming into the game for the first time.”

In November the IRFU said that they “100 per cent behind” the women’s game and committed to addressing “whatever issues there are”, according to outgoing chief executive Philip Browne.

Browne, who is set to retire from his role at the end of December, insists he wants to see the findings of the two independent reviews before discussing the situation in any detail.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Where? I remember saying "unders"? The LNR was formed by the FFR, if I said that in a way that meant the 'pro' side of the game didn't have an equal representation/say as the 'amateur' side (FFR remit) that was not my intent.


But also, as it is the governing body, it also has more responsibility. As long as WR looks at FFR as the running body for rugby in France, that 'power' will remain. If the LNR refuses to govern their clubs use of players to enable a request by FFR (from WR) to ensure it's players are able to compete in International rugby takes place they will simply remove their participation. If the players complain to the France's body, either of their health and safety concerns (through playing too many 'minutes' etc) or that they are not allowed to be part in matches of national interest, my understanding is action can be taken against the LNR like it could be any other body/business. I see where you're coming from now re EPCR and the shake up they gave it, yes, that wasn't meant to be a separate statement to say that FFR can threaten them with EPCR expulsion by itself, simply that it would be a strong repercussion for those teams to be removed (no one would want them after the above).


You keep bringing up these other things I cannot understand why. Again, do you think if the LNR were not acting responsibly they would be able to get away with whatever they want (the attitude of these posters saying "they pay the players")? You may deem what theyre doing currently as being irresponsible but most do not. Countries like New Zealand have not even complained about it because they've never had it different, never got things like windfall TV contracts from France, so they can't complain because theyre not missing out on anything. Sure, if the French kept doing things like withholding million dollar game payments, or causing millions of dollars of devaluation in rights, they these things I'm outlining would be taking place. That's not the case currently however, no one here really cares what the French do. It's upto them to sort themselves out if they're not happy. Now, that said, if they did make it obvious to World Rugby that they were never going to send the French side away (like they possibly did stating their intent to exclude 20 targeted players) in July, well then they would simply be given XV fixtures against tier 2 sides during that window and the FFR would need to do things like the 50/50 revenue split to get big teams visiting in Nov.

307 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'England's blanket of despair feels overdone - they are not a team in freefall' 'England's blanket of despair feels overdone - they are not a team in freefall'
Search