Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Disciplinary hearing blow for Ireland U20s as two more players banned

Ireland celebrate a try in Paarl versus Australia (Photo by World Rugby via Getty Images)

Ireland have suffered a double blow at the Junior World Championship, starting back-rower James McNabney and replacement Rory Telfer both receiving three-match suspensions following disciplinary hearings in the wake of separate incidents in last Thursday’s pool win over Australia. 

ADVERTISEMENT

McNabney was cited for a high tackle in the 35th minute in Paarl, foul play that was missed at the time by the referee and the TMO. That occurred when Australia were ahead in the Pool B encounter and rather than have the forward sanctioned there and then and Ireland having to play the remaining 45 minutes with 14 players, Richie Murphy’s team played on with the full complement of players.  

They led 11-10 at the interval and were to ultimately win 30-10 in a game that did finish with them eventually reduced to 14 as Telfer was yellow-carded late on. That sin-binning was quickly upgraded to a red card offence when examined in the new 10-minute yellow card review window now allowed for by the TMO bunker.

Video Spacer

We gave U20 New Zealand rugby players cameras and let them do whatever they want | Fuel Me

Video Spacer

We gave U20 New Zealand rugby players cameras and let them do whatever they want | Fuel Me

Ireland had come into their second match at the tournament having already picked up a red card versus England in their opener. Midfielder Hugh Cooney was sent off in that 34-all draw and banned for three games, a sanction that was reduced to two following his participation in the World Rugby coaching intervention programme.     

That same game-less facility will now be available for both McNabney and Telfer, meaning their respective three-game bans can also be reduced to two and ensure they will be available for selection in match day five at the tournament – a fixture that could potentially be the World Cup final if Ireland make it that far.    

Related

A disciplinary hearing statement read: “Ireland back row James McNabney appeared before an independent judicial committee on Saturday having been cited for a dangerous tackle (law 9.13). The independent disciplinary committee was chaired by Marcello d’Orey (Portugal), joined by former international players Olly Kohn (Wales) and Stefan Terblanche (South Africa). 

“The committee, having considered the player’s submissions and reviewed all available evidence, found that the red card threshold had been met and that the citing was upheld. The committee noted that the offence carries a mandatory mid-range sanction (six matches) and having considered the mitigating factors, reduced the sanction by the maximum mitigation of 50 per cent. The final sanction is three matches as follows: 

  • Ireland vs Fiji – July 4
  • Ireland’s match in round four – July 9 
  • Ireland’s match in round five – 14 July* 

“The player intends to apply to take part in the World Rugby coaching intervention programme to substitute the final match of the sanction for a coaching intervention aimed at modifying specific techniques and technical issues that contributed to the foul play. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“Ireland replacement Rory Telfer also appeared before an independent judicial committee on Saturday having received a red card in Ireland’s Pool B match against Australia. The red card was awarded pursuant to law 9.13 (dangerous tackle). 

“The independent disciplinary committee was chaired by Marcello d’Orey (Portugal), joined by former international coach Frank Hadden (Scotland) and former international referee Valeriu Toma (Romania). 

“The player accepted that foul play occurred and that the offending warranted a red card. The committee noted that the offence carries a mandatory mid-range sanction (six matches) and having considered the mitigating factors, reduced the sanction by the maximum mitigation of 50 per cent. The final sanction is three matches as follows: 

  • Ireland vs Fiji – July 4
  • Ireland’s match in round four – July 9
  • Ireland’s match in round five – 14 July* 

“The player intends to apply to take part in the World Rugby coaching intervention programme to substitute the final match of the sanction.” 

Elsewhere, Japan centre Yoshiki Omachi, who was red carded after charging into a ruck versus Wales in Stellenbosch last Thursday, was banned for one match and is unavailable to play against New Zealand next Tuesday.” 

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
I
Ian 537 days ago

The Rory Telfer head to head was as clear a red as possible. Crazy running upright like that into an opponent. He's lucky to get a chance to play again in the tournament.

P
Poorfour 538 days ago

Three such incidents in two games suggests more than an individual discipline issue. Will we see more dangerous hits from Ireland as the tournament progresses? Not a good look for them or the game.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes
Search