Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Dombrandt omission sparks Harlequins rumour mill

Alex Dombrandt

Harlequins have announced their team to head north and face Sale Sharks on Friday night and Alex Dombrandt’s absence has raised some questions.

ADVERTISEMENT

The rampant loose forward has been on the bench for Quins’ past two matches, and this has caused some concern given the uncertainty over his future. While there are reports that the 22-year-old has signed a new deal at the Stoop, there are those that are still sceptical anything has happened, and his omission only fuels the suspicions of those on social media that his future lies elsewhere.

Tellingly, he also not listed as absent due to injury.

Given his age and the reputation he has already got after a barnstorming debut season in 2018/19, there is likely to be a host of clubs that would want his signature.

https://twitter.com/JosephL17474542/status/1212721133667192832?s=20

However, some have simply put this down to squad rotation, which is an issue in the season after a Rugby World Cup. While Dombrandt did not make Eddie Jones’ squad to travel to Japan, he was in the training squads prior to the tournament, and played in the match against the Barbarians in May.

This would have compromised the mandatory five-week rest period players needed to be given, and as a result, players are going to be used sparingly throughout the season. After all, he started at No8 in both contests against Ulster in the Champions Cup, which were arguably Harlequins’ two biggest games this season to date.

Video Spacer

With a call-up for the Six Nations looking very likely, Paul Gustard will also want to manage his players to ensure they are still firing on all cylinders come the end of the season. However, until something concrete is revealed about Dombrandt’s future, there will always be concerns amongst fans that they could be losing one of their most promising players.

ADVERTISEMENT

Harlequins Starting XV:
1 Joe Marler (198)
2 Elia Elia (49)
3 Kyle Sinckler (143)
4 Stephan Lewies (11)
5 Matt Symons (35)
6 James Chisholm (80) (VC)
7 Chris Robshaw (286) (Captain)
8 Tom Lawday (11)
9 Danny Care (268) (VC)
10 Marcus Smith (71)
11 Vereniki Goneva (4)
12 Paul Lasike (14)
13 Cadan Murley (25)
14 Gabriel Ibitoye (31)
15 Ross Chisholm (114)

Replacements: 
16 Jack Musk (6)
17 Santiago Garcia Botta (9)
18 Will Collier (162)
19 Tevita Cavubati (8)
20 Semi Kunatani (16)
21 Martin Landajo (10)
22 Brett Herron (4)
23 Aaron Morris (36)

Not available due to injury: Forwards
Rob Buchanan
Scott Baldwin
George Head
Phil Swainston
Glen Young
Jack Clifford
Archie White
Will Evans

Backs
James Lang
Ben Tapuai
Francis Saili
Michele Campagnaro
Nathan Earle
Mike Brown

ADVERTISEMENT

One of Welsh Rugby’s biggest characters on and off the pitch, RugbyPass travelled to Brecon to see how life after rugby is treating Andy Powell.

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes
Search