Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Don't be surprised to see players walk out if Rugby Australia continues to struggle financially

(Photo by Mark Kolbe/Getty Images)

Just two weeks after appointing Raelene Castle’s temporary replacement, Rugby Australia has had to release three of Queensland’s brightest up and coming talent who were all in the infancy of their careers.

ADVERTISEMENT

23-year-old Wallaby Izack Rodda, along with 2019 Junior Wallabies Isaac Lucas and Harry Hockings, are all searching for a new club after refusing to accept a 60 percent pay cut and register for the Australian Government’s JobKeeper initiative.

After standing down the three players earlier in the week, the Queensland Reds, the Queensland Rugby Union and Rugby Australia terminated their contracts on Friday.

Video Spacer

Reds trio terminate contracts

Video Spacer

Reds trio terminate contracts

Rugby Australia Interim CEO Rob Clarke commented on the release of the three players late last week, who he claims are in the minority by disagreeing with the proposed terms.

“As everyone is aware the impacts of COVID-19 have been felt in every country, across every industry, and rugby is no exception,” Clarke said.

“189 professional rugby players in Australia accepted reduced pay for an interim period to enable the game to navigate the unprecedented situation.

“The three Queensland players elected not to accept these terms.”

https://www.instagram.com/p/CAeSh52g2re/

Even though Clarke later added that he hasn’t had any “indication” from the Rugby Union Players Association that more players are looking to move overseas, it only seems like a matter of when.

ADVERTISEMENT

Manager of the three players, Anthony Picone, explained that the decision not to agree to terms was due to the dire financial state of the game.

Rugby Australia is yet to stabilise its future with a broadcast deal for this shortened season and beyond, just over a week after collecting financial aid from World Rugby to support them throughout the coronavirus crisis.

Taking a 60 percent pay cut would be tough to accept in any profession, regardless of the industry, especially when contracts may not be able to be honoured as Picone highlighted.

“This is their livelihood. It is only reasonable that talented players want to secure stable employment during these times,” Picone stated.

ADVERTISEMENT

Rugby careers can’t last forever and players cannot be expected to continue acting as they will.

In the past we’ve seen players leave Australia’s shores for various reasons, as they make the most of the talent they have throughout their limited careers.

Samu Kerevi left Australia for Japan after last year’s Rugby World Cup at just 26-years-old when he was the captain of the Reds, also under the management of Picone.

Liam Gill and Sean McMahon were other players who left a Wallabies jumper behind while in their prime to chase more preferable ambitions.

While Japan is being suggested as a potential destination for the ex-Reds players, should they, as well as other Australian players, consider Super Rugby Aotearoa?

Financial stability, competitive rugby and passionate fanbases should tempt some players to move to New Zealand, just as England Centre Joe Marchant did earlier this year.

The three players definitely have plenty of options to consider, with Clarke adding that their careers would not continue on Australian shores for now.

“If they wish to go overseas then that’s their decision, there’s no avenue open to them in Australia at this time.”

Players who are still representing one of the Australian Super Rugby franchises returned to training last week, as they prepare for a competition that is still very much up in the air.

The coronavirus has plagued this country for months now, but rival codes such as the AFL and NRL have spent weeks planning and preparing for their sports to return.

In fact, Rugby League is controversially set to return in just a matter of days, even managing to include the New Zealand Warriors while Rugby Australia can’t seem to organise a competition involving a handful of States.

Already we’ve seen average Australian Super Rugby crowd numbers drop significantly from what we saw last year, down a few thousand for home matches. A lack of action from Rugby Australia at this crucial period in the game’s livelihood could prove to be detrimental in the short-term.

Without the fans to drive the resurgence of rugby’s passion and the financial stability of the sport, why shouldn’t we be surprised if players opt out to do what’s best for them?

Playing for your country is something that many of us can only dream of, but when you’ve got a family to support and mortgages to pay, don’t be surprised to see players walk out if Rugby Australia continues to struggle financially.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales
Search