Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Don't mind Borthwick, dropping Farrell is a big deal - Andy Goode

(Photo by Alex Davidson/The RFU Collection via Getty Images)

Steve Borthwick can play it down as much as he wants but dropping Owen Farrell to the bench is the biggest call an England head coach has made for quite a while.

ADVERTISEMENT

The last time Farrell was a replacement was against the USA at the 2019 World Cup and he has started at either fly half or centre whenever he has been fit and available since then, so it’s a huge call whichever way you look at it.

It isn’t the end for Farrell, who will no doubt have a key role to play when he comes on, by any means and you have to take Borthwick at his word that he has picked a team specifically to win this game but he might have a battle to get back in if Marcus Smith excels.

England team named versus France
(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

The England head coach was accustomed to chopping and changing and looking at the opposition a lot when it came to selection when he was Leicester boss and not many head coaches do it at international level, especially not at fly half, so it’s a bold call.

The number 10 is the fulcrum of the team and you want them to have control of the game plan and their fingerprints all over everything so the fact that Farrell has been starting and George Ford has been in camp does have the potential to cause confusion but you have to hope that everyone understands their roles and has clarity.

Of course, the other by-product of dropping the captain is it does send a message that nobody is untouchable and that is absolutely a good thing and something that hasn’t always been the case under previous England head coaches.

ADVERTISEMENT

I have to say it isn’t a move that I saw coming, given the style of play Borthwick is renowned for and the fact that Smith was released from the squad over the fallow week, but I think England fans should be excited.

Smith was in sparkling form in Harlequins’ Big Game win over Exeter last week and, provided he is given the keys to the attack and allowed to play his own game, we could be in for something more than a run of the mill England performance.

The evolution in Borthwick’s selection over a short period of time has been interesting as he has rightly moved away from the Smith/Farrell axis after just one game and now gone for Smith after a couple of games of Farrell at fly half but there has been a lot of consistency in other areas.

ADVERTISEMENT

As many as seven of the eight forwards have started all four games in this tournament and the centre pairing are now starting a third straight game together, with Ollie Lawrence playing an increasingly prominent role and able to do a more similar job to the one that Andre Esterhuizen does alongside Smith for Quins.

There will still be plenty of kicking involved but, with Nick Evans as attack coach as well, the hope is that we see more of a game plan that suits Smith against France and that has very much been the talk coming from Borthwick in the build-up.

Ireland are setting the standards generally in world rugby at the moment but they showed the template for beating the French and it involved a ball in play time of 46 minutes 10 seconds, when the same statistic was just 37 minutes 36 seconds as England faced Italy on the same weekend.

I expect England to kick long and keep the ball in field at times to keep France’s forwards on the move for long passages of play and then England have the pace and footwork to threaten them.

(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Farrell’s absence from the starting XV means Ellis Genge takes on the England captaincy for the first time, something I advocated before the Autumn Nations Series, and I think he’ll do a great job.

He does have a similar hotheaded streak to Farrell but the captaincy seemed to mellow him at Leicester, he led them to the Premiership title in his first full season as skipper and has proven that he can build a rapport with referees. Captaincy can be a burden for some players but he has someone who has flourished even more with the armband on.

It’s always advantageous when the captain is a forward as well and you only have to look at all the World Cup-winning teams in the professional era to see that. John Eales, Martin Johnson, John Smit, Richie McCaw and Siya Kolisi are all forwards and were all the clear choice as captain.

Borthwick has been very clear that Farrell is still captain and will assume the responsibility when he takes the field against France but Genge has the potential to be England captain at the World Cup later in the year or beyond, you never know what will happen.

Genge is up against France’s third choice tighthead as well in Dorian Aldegheri, with Uini Atonio and Mohamed Haouas both suspended, and that can only be a benefit to England but the rhetoric is very much that the plan isn’t to bludgeon them up front.

That is what makes this game so intriguing because the team selection and narrative coming out of the England camp this week is the opposite of how Borthwick normally tends to set his teams up.

Willis <a href=
Wasps Toulouse move” width=”1024″ height=”576″ /> (Photo by Alex Davidson/The RFU Collection via Getty Images)

Jack Willis could give England a bit of an edge as well when it comes to marginal gains because, even though he hasn’t been at Toulouse very long, me might have picked up some inside knowledge on a few of the opposition players.

Antoine Dupont is the best player in the world and we know how dangerous he is with his running game so even if there’s just a little tell around the breakdown or something that helps keep him a bit quieter than usual, it could be key.

France haven’t won at Twickenham in the Six Nations since 2005, when Dimitri Yachvili kicked all the points, so there is a bit of a mental hurdle there for them to overcome and I think England can put them under pressure and get the better of them.

They have the players to follow the template that Ireland set to a certain extent, even if they aren’t at that level as a team, and they just have to get their kicking strategy correct because you can’t kick loosely to the likes of Damian Penaud and Ethan Dumortier.

This is the first time that Smith is starting without Farrell and with a recognised pair of centres since the end of last year’s Six Nations, it’s hugely exciting to see what that means for England’s attack and I can see them winning by five.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

4 Comments
J
John 651 days ago

Is this a parody account?

F
Francisco 651 days ago

It will be a great shock without a doubt. Dupont's play, his ability to mobilize and break down defences, will be vital to the upset in England. A real test for Smith and I won´t lose sight of him in the game.

F
Flankly 651 days ago

Winning would be nice, and sharp attacking would be sweet, but at this stage England mostly need to show 1) solid defensive foundations, 2) forwards dominance, and 3) game management.

B
Benoît 652 days ago

not a single mention of the monumental spanking in Bath tonight.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC
Search