Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Dragons chairman backs British and Irish League and won't 'advocate' PRO14 status quo

PA

Dragons Rugby chairman David Buttress has backed a British and Irish League, saying that PRO14 stakeholders can’t shy away from ‘difficult discussions’ around the future of rugby.

ADVERTISEMENT

Buttress was speaking with BBC Wales and says that he doesn’t believe in ‘advocating’ the status quo in the PRO14.

The idea of a British and Irish League has been doing rounds for some years now, with the Welsh regions often the most vociferous in championing the idea.

Video Spacer

England players fitting suits

Video Spacer

England players fitting suits

‘We should not hide away from the fact that the PRO14 needs to continue to improve,” said Buttress. “I’ll give you an example. The Bristol game we just played in the Challenge Cup, that game was on target to sell Ashton Gate out, if it wasn’t for COVID.

“Even four weeks before the fixture back in March, before it was cancelled, they’d already sold 16,000 tickets. So is there an interest in regional rugby and professional rugby? Yes. It’s massive.”

“There’s a massive underlying interest in watching high level, professional regional rugby. What we’ve got to do is make sure we shape a product, which is in line with what supporters and spectators want to get involved in.

“I for one would love to see some sort of an evolution towards some sort of British and Irish League, where there is regular cross-border fixtures, because I think that is the future. I think there is a lot of growth in it. In there lies a fantastic future for professional rugby and a growth opportunity, but we going to have to as a result there’s going to be some changes and maybe some difficult discussions.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I think it will be a much better product at the end of it, that we leave behind as a legacy for supporters and in the end, surely that’s our job as people off the field responsible for trying to administer and improve and grow the game.

“I’d rather a legacy look like that than not have those difficult conversations and advocating the status quo because frankly I don’t believe in that.”

Buttress is not the only one supporting the idea. In late 2019 Ospreys chairman Rob Davies believes the situation is heading towards the formation of a British and Irish League that will forcefully drive new revenue streams. With the bulk of broadcast rights expiring in 2022, many believe that restructuring could take place in the lead up to what will be a pivotal year. The uncertainty in the sport due to the global pandemic could be an accelerant.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

KOKO Show | July 22nd | Full Throttle with Brisbane Test Review and Melbourne Preview

New Zealand v South Africa | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

USA vs England | Men's International | Full Match Replay

France v Argentina | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

Lions Share | Episode 4

Zimbabwe vs Namibia | Rugby Africa Cup Final | Full Match Replay

USA vs Fiji | Women's International | Full Match Replay

Tattoos & Rugby: Why are tattoos so popular with sportspeople? | Amber Schonert | Rugby Rising Locker Room Season 2

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

N
NH 3 hours ago
'The Wallabies need to convert much better - or Melbourne could be much worse'

Nice one as always Brett. I think the stats hide a bit of the dominance the lions had, and they would look alot worse in that first half when the game was more in the balance. You mention it here but I think it hasn’t been talked about enough was the lineout. The few times the wallabies managed to exit their half and get an opportunity to attack in the 1st half, the lineout was lost. This was huge in terms of lions keeping momentum and getting another chance to attack, rather than the wallabies getting their chance and to properly ‘exit’ their half. The other one you touch on re “the will jordan bounce of the ball” - is kick chase/receipt. I thought that the wallabies kicked relatively well (although were beaten in this area - Tom L rubbish penalty kicks for touch!), but our kick receipt and chase wasn’t good enough jorgenson try aside. In the 1st half there was a moment where russell kicked for a 50:22 and potter fumbled it into touch after been caught out of position, lynagh makes a similar kick off 1st phase soon after and keenan is good enough to predict the kick, catch it at his bootlaces and put a kick in. That kick happened to go out on the full but it was a demonstration on the difference in positioning etc. This meant that almost every contested kick that was spilled went the way of the lions, thats no accident, that is a better chase, more urgency, more players in the area. Wallabies need to be better in who fields their kicks getting maxy and wright under most of them and Lynagh under less, and the chase needs to be the responsibility of not just one winger but a whole group of players who pressure not just the catch but the tackle, ruck and following phase.

17 Go to comments
J
JW 3 hours ago
Competing interests and rotated squads: What the 'player welfare summer' is really telling us

Thanks for the further background to player welfare metrics Nick.


Back on the last article I noted that WR is now dedicating a whole section in their six-point business plan to this topic. It also noted that studies indicated 85-90% of workload falls outside of playing. So in respect to your point on the classification of ‘involvements’, needing to include even subs with a low volume of minutes, it actually goes further to the wider group of players that train as if they’re going to be required to start on the weekend. That makes even the 30-35 game borderline pale into insignificance.


No doubt it is one of the main reasons why France has a quota on the number of any one clubs amount of players in their International camps, where they rotate in other clubs players through the week (those not chosen in the 23 on Tues/Wed must be rotated out with players from another club for the remaining weeks prep). The number of ‘invisible’ games against a players season tally or predicted workload suggests the FFRs 25 game limit as more appropriate?


So if we take it at face value that Galthie and the FFR have got it right, only a dozen players from the last 60 international caps should have gone on this tour. More players from the ‘Scotland 23’ than the more recent 23 were eligible.


The only real pertinent question is what do players prefer more, health or money? There are lots of ethical decisions, like for instance whether France could make a market like Australia’s where their biggest rugby codes have yearly broadcast deals of 360 and 225 million euros. They do it by having a 7/8 month season, but ultimately if they don’t want it to change they can just play 11 months in the season instead.

70 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Competing interests and rotated squads: What the 'player welfare summer' is really telling us Competing interests and rotated squads: What the 'player welfare summer' is really telling us