Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Drew Mitchell: 'There has been mismanagement for the last decade at least'

Ex-Wallaby winger Drew Mitchell believes Rugby Australia would be foolish to sack Raelene Castle at this stage of the coronavirus pandemic. With rugby on hold around the globe, the sport in Australia has been plunged into financial chaos due to the absence of a new TV deal and an agreeable players salary pay cut.

ADVERTISEMENT

Amid the crisis, there have been calls from some quarters for CEO Castle – whose reputation was bruised by the Israel Folau controversy last year – to be pushed aside. However, Mitchell doesn’t believe that should happen yet with so much uncertainty stalking the game. 

Speaking to Jim Hamilton on the latest episode of The Lockdown, the RugbyPass pandemic interview series, the Sydney-based Mitchell tackled the details of the crisis that has enveloped Australian Rugby while also reflecting on his short time in Major League Rugby with Rugby United New York.   

“I know there is a lot of pressure, a lot of talk about Raelene Castle being moved on,” he said. “There is perhaps a bit of a push from a sector of people involved in the game, stakeholders and people who have an interest in the game, to move her on. 

“I don’t think that she needs to be moved on. I don’t think it’s the right time for it. Whether she is the right person for the job or not is not my decision but what is wrong is the timing of it.

“She is deep in discussions with Optus, Fox, Channel 10, potential broadcasting partners. She is deep in discussions with the players. To bring someone in now, to sack her and move her on and bring someone in now and educate them to where we are, not only just educate in terms of where we sit but also build a rapport and relationships with who you have to negotiate with, when things are so uncertain I don’t think we need more uncertainty by bringing in someone new. 

“It’s complex times here in Australian rugby, but when there is a crisis there is opportunity and we have just got to hope that the people in the right positions, the people that are making those decisions, can find the opportunity in this because there has probably been mismanagement in the last decade at least and maybe this means we have a proper look at how we are running things in the back office to set it on a more positive path.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Last capped in 2016, Mitchell suggested that Rugby Australia have been struggling to best promote the sport for the guts of a decade. “There has been an element of mismanagement probably over the last decade to be quite honest in terms of where our funds have gone and not putting the right amount of interest and importance into the grassroots pathway… we have been too focused on trying to inspire future Wallabies and Wallaroos as opposed to developing them. 

“We don’t cast the net any way near wide enough to engage with future rugby talent. We only rely really on the private schools to give us our future professional rugby players, both men and women, instead of going to the public schools out in the regional communities, indigenous communities. We need to put more focus on the grassroots areas.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search