Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Duhan van der Merwe has given an update on last weekend's injury

By PA
(Photo by Stu Forster/Getty Images)

Duhan van der Merwe has played down any concerns he might be a Scotland fitness doubt for their Rugby World Cup opener against South Africa on September 10 in Marseille. The Edinburgh wing went off with an ankle injury in the second half of last Saturday’s 30-27 Summer Nations Series defeat by France in Saint-Etienne.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, van der Merwe is optimistic he will be available for selection for the team’s final pre-tournament warm-up match at home to Georgia a week on Saturday on August 26

“I twisted my ankle a bit, luckily it was nothing serious,” the 28-year-old explained after being confirmed in Scotland’s 33-man World Cup squad on Wednesday morning. “It’s fine, should be all good. We have had Monday and Tuesday off so we will assess it today, but hopefully it will be all good and I’m fine for Georgia.”

Video Spacer

Predicting Pool B’s winner | The Breakdown

Video Spacer

Predicting Pool B’s winner | The Breakdown

Asked if he was confident he would be ready to face South Africa, his birth country, in the opening World Cup pool match, van der Merwe said: “Yes, 100 per cent.”

Head coach Gregor Townsend also had good news to report on the fitness of first-choice scrum-half Ben White. The 25-year-old has been nursing an ankle injury that forced him off in the first half of the home game against France on August 12, but he has been included in the final World Cup squad and could be involved against Georgia later this month.

Related

“Ben is good,” said Townsend. “He had a meeting with the specialist on Monday and that was positive. He ran yesterday [Tuesday], which was the first time he had ran in 10 days, so we will see over the next two or three days if he will be available for next week’s game. That is the target.

“It would be nice to have him available for next week but if he doesn’t come right for that, we know he will be available for South Africa.”

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The Waikato young gun solving one of rugby players' 'obvious problems' Injury breeds opportunity for Waikato entrepreneur
Search