Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Dumb tackle choice': RFU chief's blunt verdict on Munster red card

(Photo by Brian Lawless/PA Images via Getty Images)

The clampdown on shoulder-to-head tackles in the Heineken Champions Cup continued on Saturday with Jack O’Donoghue of Munster red-carded for his first-half collision with Northampton’s Dave Ribbans in Limerick.

ADVERTISEMENT

Munster were 17-0 ahead when the play at Thomond Park was halted with the clock showing 22:10 minutes gone. Referee Tual Trainini had initially decided he would brandish O’Donoghue with only a yellow card but he was encouraged to take another look at the footage by his TMO Eric Gauzins.

The different angles he saw resulted in him upgrading the seriousness of the foul play tackle and with no mitigation evident according to the officials, O’Donoghue was sent off just three minutes after he had scored the second Munster try.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

“Eric, what I see now is a contact to the head by the No6 red on No4 white,” said Trainini to his TMO. “This is foul play as the player is upright and the level of danger is high. At this moment I am on a red card so let’s see if we have a mitigating factor.

Gauzins replied: “Let me show you a wide angle… It’s an okay decision.” That left Trainini to conclude: “I don’t see a change in height, I don’t see a change in dynamic due to the first tackle so for me, I don’t see a mitigating factor. I am on a red card against six red.”

Ex-Ireland lock Donncha O’Callaghan, who twice won the Champions Cup with Munster, agreed with the outcome. “It’s the right decision,” he said while co-commentating for BT Sport. “It’s is going to be tough to take, especially for Jack O’Donoghue, but I think it is the right decision.

“We have to keep going with this, we have to tidy up the game for head contact. That is contact with a shoulder to head, it is a red card. I do feel sorry for Jack O’Donoghue. Late at the line he has to change his decision but you have to be lower.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Studio pundit Conor O’Shea, the RFU’s director of performance, remarked at half-time: “Donncha was great on commentary. There was no excusing that as a Munster man. Players have to learn. There is no malice in what he did there, it was just a dumb tackle choice that he didn’t need to make.”

Ex-England skipper Lawrence Dallaglio added: “You score a try in the back row up against a pretty strong back row and you are feeling good about life until you make the wrong tackle selection. I don’t think there are any doubts about it.

“Jack O’Donoghue had time to adjust, he could have easily gone in for the turnover and if you make contact without wrapping your arm, it’s a very easy decision for the referee. His body height is still going up as he makes contact. A very easy decision for the referee.”

The red card was the second of the day in the tournament for shoulder-to-head contact as Sale’s Cobus Wiese was sent off for a similar incident in his team’s defeat to Toulouse.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Where? I remember saying "unders"? The LNR was formed by the FFR, if I said that in a way that meant the 'pro' side of the game didn't have an equal representation/say as the 'amateur' side (FFR remit) that was not my intent.


But also, as it is the governing body, it also has more responsibility. As long as WR looks at FFR as the running body for rugby in France, that 'power' will remain. If the LNR refuses to govern their clubs use of players to enable a request by FFR (from WR) to ensure it's players are able to compete in International rugby takes place they will simply remove their participation. If the players complain to the France's body, either of their health and safety concerns (through playing too many 'minutes' etc) or that they are not allowed to be part in matches of national interest, my understanding is action can be taken against the LNR like it could be any other body/business. I see where you're coming from now re EPCR and the shake up they gave it, yes, that wasn't meant to be a separate statement to say that FFR can threaten them with EPCR expulsion by itself, simply that it would be a strong repercussion for those teams to be removed (no one would want them after the above).


You keep bringing up these other things I cannot understand why. Again, do you think if the LNR were not acting responsibly they would be able to get away with whatever they want (the attitude of these posters saying "they pay the players")? You may deem what theyre doing currently as being irresponsible but most do not. Countries like New Zealand have not even complained about it because they've never had it different, never got things like windfall TV contracts from France, so they can't complain because theyre not missing out on anything. Sure, if the French kept doing things like withholding million dollar game payments, or causing millions of dollars of devaluation in rights, they these things I'm outlining would be taking place. That's not the case currently however, no one here really cares what the French do. It's upto them to sort themselves out if they're not happy. Now, that said, if they did make it obvious to World Rugby that they were never going to send the French side away (like they possibly did stating their intent to exclude 20 targeted players) in July, well then they would simply be given XV fixtures against tier 2 sides during that window and the FFR would need to do things like the 50/50 revenue split to get big teams visiting in Nov.

307 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Why England's defence of the realm has crumbled without Felix Jones Why England's defence of the realm has crumbled without Felix Jones
Search