Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Dylan Hartley: 'I would have started Fin Smith against Japan'

Marcus Smith chats to Fin Smith at England training (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Former England skipper Dylan Hartley has claimed that Fin Smith should have been handed a first Test start this Saturday versus Japan rather than have Marcus Smith take the shirt from the unavailable George Ford. Northampton rookie Smith recently helped the Saints to Gallagher Premiership glory at Twickenham, but he has only been chosen as a replacement for this weekend’s tour opener in the Far East.

ADVERTISEMENT

Harlequins’ Smith hasn’t started for England since last October’s bronze medal final versus Argentina at the Rugby World Cup, a fixture where he was selected at full-back with Owen Farrell starting his final match at his country’s No10 before embarking on his Test sabbatical.

Both Smiths played twice each off the bench during the Guinness Six Nations, Fin making a debut away to Italy and also featuring in Scotland while Marcus was out with injury before returning to face Ireland and France, but Steve Borthwick has now chosen Marcus as his No10 with Ford not touring due to an achilles injury.

Video Spacer

Japan coach Eddie Jones on what sets South African players apart | RPTV

Jim Hamilton spoke to enigmatic Japan coach Eddie Jones about what sets South African players like Pieter-Steph du Toit aside from the rest. Watch exclusively on RugbyPass TV

Watch now

Video Spacer

Japan coach Eddie Jones on what sets South African players apart | RPTV

Jim Hamilton spoke to enigmatic Japan coach Eddie Jones about what sets South African players like Pieter-Steph du Toit aside from the rest. Watch exclusively on RugbyPass TV

Watch now

The tour also features a two-Test series against the All Blacks in New Zealand in July, a schedule that left retired skipper Hartley suggesting that Borthwick should have gone with Fin Smith versus the Japanese. Speaking to Grosvenor Sport, Hartley said: “In the absence of Farrell and Ford, the tour is being billed as make or break for Marcus. Owen and George fought for the 10 shirt.

“Marcus isn’t going anywhere. He is a class player. Likewise, Fin Smith. We are obsessed with the 10 shirt and who is our next Jonny Wilkinson. I understand that because you build your attack around that player and the scrum-half.

Fixture
Internationals
Japan
17 - 52
Full-time
England
All Stats and Data

“The Smiths complement each other. Marcus is world class and can do things other players can only dream of. Fin has had a blockbuster season, up for player of the year, won a trophy and guided his team. His form is consistent. For me the balance is great.

“I thought Fin should start and pair him with Alex Mitchell, who has guided Northampton to the title. They are the key cogs in the big machine. You need continuity and they have an almost telepathic understanding.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Saturday’s match in Tokyo, which is being exclusively streamed live on RugbyPass TV in the UK and Ireland, will pit England coach Borthwick against his former boss Eddie Jones, who has taken over the Japanese following his year-long misadventure with Australia.

Hartley also reflected on what Jones originally brought to England when appointed ahead of the 2016 Six Nations and how he is now changing as a coach in his dealings with players. “He did take it to extremes but that is in the past now. He is changing. I had a text exchange with him recently and was talking about a player. I asked him if he was going to get the ‘Old Eddie’ or the ‘New Eddie’. He said: ‘Ah mate, a bit of old, and a bit of new. Times have changed!’

“The England team environment I was in after the 2015 World Cup was very different and to that at the end of Eddie’s reign. In 2015 England were a s*** show after the World Cup. There was no backbone, no belief and Eddie inherited that squad.

“Eddie came in and had to change things. When you do that you cannot pull band aid plaster off slowly. You have to rip it off and jump straight in. He made us fitter, made us train harder. He showed us what professionalism looked like.

ADVERTISEMENT

“For the three years I was involved, it was hard. But we were laying the foundations for a new culture and a better one which saw us to the 2019 World Cup final and the semi-finals in 2023 both after poor Six Nations.

“Do the hard stuff then you can take the foot off a bit when people have the routine stuff ingrained in them, organised, diligent. When Eddie came in we needed to change. He came in and said, ‘We are going to do this and have to, and it will be ugly’.

“We benefited from it. And that was the start of a pretty successful period in English rugby history. The foundations were laid by a hard man who delivers results. Most players respected and appreciated being driven like that. That way you maximise your potential. Eddie won’t need to shake the foundations too much in Japan. Their culture is about respect and they will do it.”

Hartley added that Jones’ departure from England in December 2022 wasn’t nice. “As a very matter of fact person, when a job is over, it’s over. No looking back. But England owes him huge thanks. Someone said to me how you enter an organisation is very important and so is how you leave one.

“The taste in the mouth over Eddie’s departure wasn’t good. The pitchforks were out for him. It all collapsed like a ton of bricks. But I respected him because he was consistent throughout. He is true to his colours. He fronts up every week. Says what he thinks and goes for it. He was always consistent.

“The English public and the RFU should have thanked him far more. He gave us some fantastic years of rugby and unearthed some talent, players I’d never heard of. He was at a club game all the time.

“He called meetings around the country when he wasn’t allowed to with players volunteering their time because they wanted to. He got us to put England first rather than club vs club, such as Northampton. Leicester. He got us way more connected.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

287 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Tupou Vaa'i gives first impression of 'big unit' Fabian Holland Tupou Vaa'i on 'big unit' Fabian Holland
Search