Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Early Antoine Dupont prognosis not looking good for France

Antoine Dupont of France must leave the field with a jaw injury during the Rugby World Cup France 2023 match between France and Namibia at Stade Velodrome on September 21, 2023 in Marseille, France. (Photo by Lionel Hahn/Getty Images)

Early reports this Friday morning around the extent of the injury to Antoine Dupont are not looking good for France and their mercurial captain.

ADVERTISEMENT

Dupont is suspected to have broken a bone in his face following a head-on-head clash with Namibia centre Johan Deysel.

He was taken from the pitch to hospital for an examination and scans on the suspected break, leaving France facing the nightmare scenario of being without their star captain until the knock-out phases of the Rugby World Cup.

RMC Sport report that Dupont’s brother has confirmed that the scrumhalf has suffered a fracture to his zygomatic bone.  This would normally mean a six-week recovery time, which would end the scrumhalf’s participation in the World Cup.

However, all is not lost, with hopes that the recovery time could potentially be shortened to four weeks, depending on the severity of the injury, which is not yet known, with medics waiting for a hematoma to his face to reduce before making any further prognosis.

The next 48 hours will be crucial.

In the circumstances, it is not inconceivable that Dupont will play with heavy padding to his face or even a protective face mask, to allow him to return to the field as early as possible. Should the recovery time be reduced to four weeks, Dupont could yet feature in a potential semi-final, should France make it that far.

However, it would mean he will miss a likely quarter-final against one of Ireland, South Africa or Scotland.

ADVERTISEMENT

As France waits with bated breath for news on Dupont, Fabien Galthie has defended his decision to bring the superstar scrumhalf back on after halftime.

“There’s a suspicion of a crack or fracture in his jaw. He’s gone for tests,” said Gatlhie after the match. “We’ll wait for the results before moving forward. We need to take advantage of this great victory and the players’ fine performance.”

With some questioning why Dupont was risked against Pool A n Namibia, Galthie was quizzed on why he decided to bring the Touslain back on after halftime in Marseille.

“What do you want me to say? You can’t take 14 players off at half-time. Our plan was to bring off one, three and five at half-time, then the rest at the 55th minute. The aim was to give everyone some game-time and not sit back for a month. The players wanted and needed to play.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Back row Francois Cros also expressed his sadness at the news that Dupont’s injury was serious.

“I hope it’s not serious. If it is, it would obviously have an impact on him and on us. We still have some experienced nines who can take over.

“Watching the replay, we knew the decision the referee would make. But we had no idea about Toto’s [Antoine Dupont’s] condition. We didn’t know if he was going off as a precaution or if he was really hurt until the end of the match.”

Centre Gael Fickou said: “At the moment, we don’t know what’s wrong. We’re obviously waiting and waiting. We’re frustrated for him. I hope he’ll be able to play and that it’s nothing serious. We’re all waiting impatiently for the results. When he went off, we suspected it was a bit serious.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

5 Comments
T
Thomas 422 days ago

Couilloud should start

C
Chris 422 days ago

Johan Deysel will have a tough couple of months I believe... Between a (deserved) lengthy ban and the fact that he plays and lives in France (pro D2).... Frenchmen are not a very forgiving people should the country not qualify for the semi...

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 6 minutes ago
England player ratings vs South Africa | 2024 Autumn Nations Series

As has been the way all year, and for all England's play I can remember. I missed a lot of the better years under Eddie though.


Lets have a look at the LQB for the last few games... 41% under 3 sec compared to 56% last week, 47% in the game you felt England best in against NZ, and 56 against Ireland.


That was my impression as well. Dunno if that is a lack of good counterattack ball from the D, forward dominance (Post Contact Meters stats reversed yesterday compared to that fast Ireland game), or some Borthwick scheme, but I think that has been highlighted as Englands best point of difference this year with their attack, more particularly how they target using it in certain areas. So depending on how you look at it, not necessarily the individual players.


You seem to be falling into the same trap as NZs supporters when it comes to Damien McKenzie. That play you highlight Slade in wasn't one of those LQB situations from memory, that was all on the brilliance of Smith. Sure, Slade did his job in that situation, but Smith far exceeded his (though I understand it was a move Sleightholme was calling for). But yeah, it's not always going to be on a platter from your 10 and NZ have been missing that Slade line, in your example, more often than not too. When you go back to Furbank and Feyi-Waboso returns you'll have that threat again. Just need to generate that ball, wait for some of these next Gen forwards to come through etc, the props and injured 6 coming back to the bench. I don't think you can put Earl back to 7, unless he spends the next two years speeding up (which might be good for him because he's getting beat by speed like he's not used to not having his own speed to react anymore).

7 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Raffaele Storti: The Portuguese 'arrow' poised to carve up Murrayfield Raffaele Storti: The Portuguese 'arrow' poised to carve up Murrayfield
Search