Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Eddie Jones explains the thinking behind removing Owen Farrell from the Calcutta Cup cauldron

Owen Farrell looks on as the secondhalf collapse unfolds

Eddie Jones has revealed he brought off Owen Farrell at a critical phase of Saturday’s remarkable 38-38 draw with Scotland at Twickenham due to England’s captain losing his “edge”.

ADVERTISEMENT

Farrell was replaced by George Ford in the 71st minute with the climatic match of the 2019 Guinness Six Nations tied at 31-31 after the Scots had produced five unanswered tries to threaten the greatest comeback victory in Test history.

The Saracens fly-half had gifted two of those tries – to Stuart McInally and Finn Russell – and was also lucky to escape a card for a late shoulder-led tackle on Darcy Graham.

Confessing his role in Scotland’s resurgence, Farrell admitted “we probably gifted them the momentum swing, me more than anyone” and it was Ford who crossed for the converted added-time try that spared England from humiliation.

“Owen lost a bit of his edge. He was just a little bit off his best and George Ford has been in exceptional form this week,” Jones told BBC Radio 5 Live’s Sportsweek programme.

Video Spacer

“We know George is an excellent player who can bring something different to the table. We ended up getting a draw due to George’s brilliant play.

“The only thing I was pleased about in the second half was the response of our finishers, who got us out of a deep hole. They got us a draw in difficult circumstances in the end.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Overall England produced the best rugby of the Six Nations and dominated the try-scoring charts by touching down 24 times, 10 more than their closest rivals Ireland and Scotland, yet it was Wales who were crowned worthy champions.

Collapses in the second half in Cardiff and against Scotland at Twickenham point to a mental fragility that must be remedied in time for the World Cup and Jones is ready to enlist outside help to find a solution.

“The All Blacks had this problem for eight years and it cost them two World Cups. It’s not an easy problem to fix. We’ve had four years, we’re getting there,” Jones said.

Owen Farrell goes off the field during the Six Nations match between England and Scotland at Twickenham (Photo by Henry Browne/Getty Images)
ADVERTISEMENT

“We know what the issue is and we know how to fix it. We’ve got a very concrete plan in mind to fix it.

“It’s just about getting the right personnel and staff in who can engage the players in conversation and allow them to be honest in how they think under pressure.

“If you look at the Six Nations in its entirety, tries for and against, we sit fairly well. We had a poor 30 against Wales and a poor 40 against Scotland.”

Wing Jack Nowell admitted seeing Scotland retain the Calcutta Cup felt more like a defeat than a draw and lock George Kruis used complacency to explain how a 31-0 lead was surrendered.

“It was disappointing. It was a proper tale of two halves. We got shocked and just didn’t deal with that properly,” Kruis said.

“In the first half it probably came a bit too easily and then off the back of that we probably weren’t humble enough to realise where we were at.

“We lost control in the second half against Wales. Apart the second half against Scotland and half an hour against Wales, we’ve got to look at the bigger picture and we’ve had a really good Six Nations, but this is a tough one to take.”

PA

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 1 hour ago
Gloucester respond to complaints over Russian flag

I don't listen to Nigel Farage. Really not sure where you'd be getting that from. Maybe you should stick to responding to what I've actually said, rather than speculating about my sources.


I'm not sure what you think Putin is going to do. He'll probably conquer Ukraine, but its taken him a long time, and cost him a lot of soldiers. Hitler overran France in a matter of weeks and then started bombing Britain. At this rate Putin might make it to Paris by 2080? I think he'll give up long before then!


I don't see what Stalinist language policy has to do with any of what we're talking about. De-Ukrainization took place in the 1930s, but the genocide of Palestine is taking place in 2025. If your argument is that the invasion of Ukraine is part of a longer history of Russian suppression of Ukraine then you might have a point, but that really just underlines the key difference between Hitler and Putin; Hitler wanted to dominate as much area as possible and so posed a threat to all of Europe, whereas Putin wants to force the assimilation of those who have historically been within the Russian sphere of influence, so only poses a threat to eastern europe and central asia.


"Read and think for yourself."

What would you recommend I read? On the genocide of Palestine I've found Patrick Wolfe's "Settler Colonialism and the Elimination of the Native" and Sai Englert's "Settlers, Workers, and the Logic of Accumulation by Dispossession" especially useful - they might disabuse you of the notion that what we are witnessing is an "authoritarian criminal syndicate" fighting a nation! - rather Zionist genocide is a largely democratic process, arising from a structure of settler colonialism which has no analogue in Ukraine.

9 Go to comments
F
Flankly 2 hours ago
Six players Rassie Erasmus must hand Springbok debuts to in 2025

Sloppy piece by Josh. It should be Stormers, obviously.


Also:

David Kriel, who, like Hooker, is comfortable in both the midfield and the back-tree

Being comfortable in trees is kind of a quirky qualification for the Boks Office lads to emphasize.

2 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ ‘I’m coming for you’: Byron McGuigan’s Mancunian malevolence ‘I’m coming for you’: Byron McGuigan’s Mancunian malevolence
Search