Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Eddie Jones reacts to losing Pacific Nations Cup final

By Ned Lester
Eddie Jones of Japan. Photo by Toru Hanai - World Rugby/World Rugby via Getty Images

Japan’s dream of a Pacific Nations Cup title came crashing down in a hurry after as tight of an opening hour as you could hope for in a tournament final.

ADVERTISEMENT

A final-quarter Fijian onslaught saw the score go from 10 apiece to 41-10 in the space of 20 minutes before a consolation try, albeit an impressive one, from Japan’s Malo Tuitama, brought the game to a close.

Japan head coach Eddie Jones entered the post-match press conference with equal parts humility and assurance, using his opening statement to address his opponents’ achievement.

“Firstly, congratulations to Fiji,” he said after taking his seat in front of 50-odd Japanese media in Osaka. “They’re a great model for teams that have been outside the tier one on how to develop new talent.

“Most of those players have played for the Fijian Drua in Super Rugby and they’ve just developed a great depth and breadth in their squad.

“They played good, tough Test match rugby today. For my team, I’m really pleased with our effort today, but we’re not quite at that level. We know we’ve got to work harder and longer, and we’ll do that to reach the level we’re required to be at.

“I’m really pleased with the effort of our young players, but we’re not quite good enough at the moment.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The coach repeated numerous times in the press conference that his eyes were firmly set on the 2027 Rugby World Cup, and had therefore been intentional with his selections of young talent for the tournament.

Jones emphasised his long-term strategy so many times that he ended up answering a follow-up question by replying “I don’t know what else you want me to say.”

The coach did provide insight into the areas he saw most growth in throughout the tournament.

“Under Haru’s leadership, they worked well together and became a lot more connected, so that’s really pleasing. There’s a developing culture within the team that’s really positive.

“And, from a rugby point of view, at times during the PNC I thought our attack was absolutely outstanding. So, that’s a positive for us. They’re two good areas of growth for us.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Momentum

0'
HT
FT
Fiji
Japan

A number of Japanese youngsters impressed throughout the tournament, not least of which was halfback Shinobu Fujiwara, who looked right at home in the international arena after entering the PNC with just two Test caps to his name.

“For a young halfback, I think he’s learning really well. Today was a testing game for him but I think he’ll learn a lot from today’s game but I think he’s come along really well.

“He’s quick around the ruck, he’s got a good pass, he’s got a running game that can get even better, so I think he’s done really well.”

Related

The positives also include the aforementioned attack, which produced 40+ points in every game outside of the final thanks to high ball retention and a highly efficient attack, aided by a 90 per cent success rate off the kicking tee.

On the flip side, Jones was brutally honest about his team’s shortcomings in the final.

“I don’t think there’s an area of the game that we won. We didn’t win the set-piece contest, we didn’t win the breakdown contest, we didn’t win the aerial contest, so the point you’re making is 100 per cent right.

“We work really hard in that area but we just weren’t good enough today so we’ll continue to work hard and by 2027 we’ll be good enough. Today’s a good reminder of how far we are off the mark. As painful as it is, it’s the truth and we’ve just got to keep at it now.”

While it is a young Japan team, it was Fiji who owned the younger average age across the squad. Lastly, Jones was asked to assess his side’s timeline and how far along he sees them as being compared to his expectations at the beginning of the international season.

“The problem with answering this question is that it’s always based on results. And, based on results, we’re not where we need to be. But, based on the effort of the players and the title bits and pieces I’ve seen, we’re probably ahead of where I thought we’d be.”

The Asahi Super Dry Pacific Nations Cup is in full swing - catch every match live on RugbyPass TV or via your local broadcaster! Watch here

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 35 minutes ago
All Blacks player ratings vs Australia | Bledisloe Cup I

Yes I know little of South Africa's past teams I'm afraid, theyve obviously had great teams throughout their history.


You raise a tricky dilemma. Any team is a sum of their parts. To make a point, lets say that South Africa aren't a team that has been able to take advantage, or use all if it's 'parts', to a maximum before, were as you could say that 2015 AB did use all of it's parts and become the 'most complete' team in history. Now a) that might not be exactly true of either team, and b) even if it was true one could argue that doesn't mean the result is going to go one way or the other. SA "limited" style could win out again ABs "complete" style etc.


I'm of the belief that attack trumps defence, that the ball will always beat the man.. that the AB's having been so good because they played the best style of rugby and won against all the odds. They have not had the best players, they make the best of their players. That's what I see clicking in this current side, theyre becoming 'complete' again. I don't know why they've not been able to do it all game. You can point to their discipline but it could easily be a drop in physical conditioning. They've all got bigger, it's been a big area of change in the NZ game. They've also lost cohesion


So yes and no. I think Sacha is someone to enable a complete game, but SA are going to also lose some key 'parts' to there game when the vets retire. Like how NZ still had some 'parts' post 2015, they had no one to link them, hence how I think this team now trumps those because they do look to have someone who can make them complete, despite the individual parts (read "players"). The parts will still matter though, England have some great props coming through, France look to have the best trajectory, will there be enough pieces for Sacha to put together? Your forwards will play a big factor, I really like the idea of BJD offload game adding to that completeness. That certainly doesn't take away from what theyve done, they might indeed have beat that opposite idea, or this new team. Certainly the chance is there to do it, and this current team hasn't been doing it. It will be hard to think of a 'great' team that is actually 'two' teams over a 4 year period!

58 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Why Rassie Erasmus should cull some Boks veterans for 2027 Why Rassie Erasmus should cull some Boks veterans for 2027
Search