Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Eddie Jones to cull 30 per cent of England squad by 2023

Young players like George Martin couild benefit from a heavy England cull /Getty via PA

Eddie Jones has been criticised for not blooding new talent in the Six Nations championship and his stance looks even more confusing after the England head coach revealed that only “70 per cent” of the current squad can expect to make the squad for the 2023 Rugby World Cup in France.

ADVERTISEMENT

Players such as Ollie Lawrence, Harry Randall – now injured – and Paolo Odogwu have been largely ignored as England have stuttered through the Championship, losing to Scotland and Wales and major changes are not expected for the game with France on Saturday. However, the squad will now go into the match knowing that many of them could be dumped shortly.

Jones said: “It is always hard to know. We are definitely going through a transition period now and had a fairly settled team from 2019 to now and like most teams when you have had a settled period there needs to be a little bit of a revision of your members and to freshen it up and we are going through that at the moment.

Video Spacer

Dan Lydiate talks to The Offload after his devastating injury in Rd.1

Video Spacer

Dan Lydiate talks to The Offload after his devastating injury in Rd.1

“I would say anywhere up to 70 per cent of this squad will go through to the World Cup but it will be dependent on their desire, form, fitness and so we take all those things into consideration and make the final decision.”

Jones has addressed the continuing problem of giving away too many penalties which was seen in the los to Wales including Maro Itoje’s repeated errors. England have given away an average of 13.6 penalties per game with the collapse at the Principality Stadium saw Itoje alone conceded five. In the 40-24 defeat. He said: “No one goes out there and tries to give away penalties. Everyone is working hard but sometimes players just over-exert in certain areas. Those players we’ll have a quiet chat to and they’ve been reflecting on it. I’ve had at least three or four players ring me during the week to talk about how they need to tend to their errors. That’s the great honesty of this team. We’ll keep working on that.

Jones said he may look again at Sam Underhill who is now fit but is not going to be in the squad of 28 for the French game and does not know how the opposition will react to a long break after the game with Scotland was postponed due to positive Covid tests. He added: “We have seen team play really well after a break and also not so well. We are more concerned about ourselves rather than what France are going to bring. We know they will be well organised and physical in the forwards. The good attributes they will bring won’t change and we have to find the best of ourselves. Whatever team turns up at Twickenham will be tough.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 48 minutes ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Set pieces are important and the way teams use them is a great indication of how they play the game. No team is showcasing their revolution more than the Springboks. This year they have mauled less and primarily in the attacking third. Otherwise they have tended to set like they are going to maul and then play around the corner or shove the ball out the back. They arent also hitting the crash ball carrier constantly but instead they are choosing to use their width or a big carrying forward in wider areas. While their maul is varied the scrum is still a blunt instrument winning penalties before the backs have a go. Some teams have chosen to blunt their set piece game for more control. The All Blacks are kicking more penalties and are using their powerful scrum as an attacking tool choosing that set piece as an attacking weapon. Their willingness to maul more and in different positions is also becoming more prominent. The French continue to play conservative rugby off the set piece using their big bruisers frequently. The set piece is used differently by different teams. Different teams play different ways and can be successful regardless. They can win games with little territory and possession or smash teams with plenty of both. The game of rugby is for all types and sizes and thats true in the modern era. I hope that administrators keep it that way and dont go further towards a Rugby League style situation. Some administrators are of the opinion that rugby is too slow and needs to be sped up. Why not rather empower teams to choose how they want to play and create a framework that favours neither size nor agility. That favours neither slow tempo play or rock n roll rugby. Create a game that favour both and challenge teams to execute their plans. If World Rugby can create a game like that then it will be the ultimate winner.

34 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
'Let's not sugarcoat it': Former All Black's urgent call to protect eligibility rules

Yep, no one knows what will happen. Thing is I think (this is me arguing a point here not a random debate with this one) they're better off trialing it now in a controlled environment than waiting to open it up in a knee jerk style reaction to a crumbling organtization and team. They can always stop it again.


The principle idea is that why would players leave just because the door is ajar?


BBBR decides to go but is not good enough to retain the jersey after doing it. NZ no longer need to do what I suggest by paying him to get back upto speed. That is solely a concept of a body that needs to do what I call pick and stick wth players. NZR can't hold onto everyone so they have to choose their BBBRs and if that player comes back from a sabbatical under par it's a priority to get him upto speed as fast as possible because half of his competition has been let go overseas because they can't hold onto them all. Changing eligibility removes that dilemma, if a BBBR isn't playing well you can be assured that someone else is (well the idea is that you can be more assured than if you only selected from domestic players).


So if someone decides they want to go overseas, they better do it with an org than is going to help improve them, otherwise theyre still basically as ineligible as if they would have been scorning a NZ Super side that would have given them the best chance to be an All Black.

147 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ What is the future of rugby in 2025? What is the future of rugby in 2025?
Search