Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Edinburgh boss cries foul over Stormers scrum

Mike Blair is not happy with how the scrums were reffereed by Frank Murphy /Getty

Edinburgh head coach Mike Blair revealed his frustrations with the referee Frank Murphy’s scrum decisions in his side’s 18-34 defeat to the Stormers in Cape Town on Saturday.

ADVERTISEMENT

Edinburgh entered the match with a powerful front row in the form of WP Nel, Stuart McInally and Pierre Schoeman and they had the Stormers under the pump in the scrums, especially in the first half.

However, Blair felt his team were not rewarded for their dominance in that area, which meant that they missed out on possible scoring opportunities at Cape Town Stadium.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

“I think we fronted up really well,” said Blair. “We were disappointed with our start against the Bulls last week and I thought we showed a huge amount of control and pressure in that first 30 minutes.

“I am surprised that they weren’t penalised more. We’ve got a dominant scrum. We are going forward; the scrum is going to the ground and the referee is saying play the ball away.

“That doesn’t happen. We were dominant and we should be rewarded for being dominant in that area.

“The Stormers were excellent in their defence and they put a huge amount of pressure on our attack and that was their pinch point.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Our pinch point was our scrum and I think it was managed a bit to get the game going when in fact we had a huge amount of dominance there, which should have resulted in more points and potentially yellow cards for illegal scrumming.”

While the scrums were a major talking point, Blair believes the Stormers won the game with their defence and their speed out wide.

“I thought the Stormers were excellent today,” said Blair.

“The opportunities they got they took them and they harassed us with their defence.

“They got some incredible individuals, especially in the back row.

“If you give their centres and wings a sniff, they will take it and that is the beauty of their game.

ADVERTISEMENT

“They got a strong defence and they are looking to get errors out of you and they force you to make that extra pass and they got speed and skill to make the most of it.

“That is what won them the game. Although, I do feel that had we been given our due reward for what we were doing in the scrum then we could have controlled the game a little bit better.

Meanwhile, Stormers head coach John Dobson admitted that his team fell short in the scrums on Saturday.

“It surprised us a little a bit. I thought we had more parity,” said Dobson.

“I thought we got beaten in the scrums earlier on but it’s an all-Scotland front row. It’s a really good scrumming front row.

“I was a bit disappointed with our performance. They had a really good tactic by isolating Neethling [Fouche] and they got away with it, which is great for them.

“However, it is not our standard of scrumming – we got caught on the double shove and that put us under pressure at the start.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
M
Michael Röbbins (academic and writer extraordinair 811 days ago

Just so everyone is on the same page: it’s the non-SA side whinging about the referee. Let the record show, gentlewomen of the jury.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING How the Black Ferns Sevens reacted to Michaela Blyde's code switch Michaela Blyde's NRLW move takes team by surprise
Search