Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

England back-rower Tom Curry banned after last Saturday's red card

(Photo by Dan Mullan/Getty Images)

Back-rower Tom Curry must attend tackle school if he is to feature in another England pool game prior to his team’s likely progress to the Rugby World Cup quarter-finals on the weekend of October 14.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 25-year-old has received a three-game ban that can be reduced to two after the yellow card he received from referee Mathieu Raynal for his head-on-head collision with Argentina’s Juan Cruz Mallia last Saturday in Marseille was upgraded to a red card offence following a TMO bunker review of the footage.

Despite Curry’s third-minute exit, England went on to comfortably win their World Cup opener 27-10 at Stade Velodrome.

Video Spacer

Rugbypass TV

Watch rugby on demand, from exclusive shows and documentaries to extended highlights from RWC 2023. Anywhere. Anytime. All for free!

Join us

Video Spacer

Rugbypass TV

Watch rugby on demand, from exclusive shows and documentaries to extended highlights from RWC 2023. Anywhere. Anytime. All for free!

Join us

It was the next day when it was confirmed that the forward would appear before a virtual disciplinary hearing judicial committee on Tuesday chaired by Adam Casselden (Australia) and including former players John Langford (Australia) and Jamie Corsi (Wales).

That hearing has now ended and a statement read: “England’s Tom Curry attended an independent disciplinary committee hearing for an offence contrary to law 9.13 (dangerous tackle) as a result of a review by the foul play review official on September 9.

Related

“The player accepted the red card and was suspended for two matches (subject to completion of the coaching intervention programme). The player accepted that foul play occurred and that the offence warranted a red card.

“The committee noted that the offence carries a mandatory minimum mid-range sanction (six matches).

ADVERTISEMENT

“Having considered the mitigating factors, including admission of foul play and correctness of the red card at the first opportunity, an exemplary disciplinary record, apology to the player and good character, the committee reduced the sanction by the maximum mitigation of 50 per cent.

“The final sanction of three matches is to be applied as follows:

  • England vs Japan, September 17;
  • England vs Chile, September 23;
  • England vs Samoa, October 7 (The player will be free to play in this match subject to successful completion of the coaching intervention programme.

“The player intends to apply to take part in the World Rugby coaching intervention programme to substitute the final match of the sanction for a coaching intervention aimed at modifying specific techniques and technical issues that contributed to the foul play subject to successful completion.”

The red card for Curry was England’s third sending-off in four matches for contact with an opposition player’s head. Owen Farrell was given a four-game ban for his August 12 Twickenham collision with Wales’ Taine Basham, while Billy Vunipola was suspended for three games for his August 19 Aviva Stadium collision with Ireland’s Andrew Porter.

That ban was reduced to two games after Vunipola successfully completed tackle school, freeing him for selection in this weekend’s game against Japan.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

33 Comments
P
Peter 465 days ago

Given the high likelihood of red cards, I think most teams will be missing a few key players by the time we reach the quarters, semis and final.

s
sam 466 days ago

I’m positive that anyone who doesn’t agree won’t be shy in telling me but what I find most infuriating with the high tackle/ reffing debate is the inconsistency.
If world rugby deemed any head contact an immediate red, I wouldn’t be the happiest. BUT if it was reffed consistently and all the players and fans knew the deal I think it would eventually become part of the game. Same if head contact was fine dependant on force and malice etc.but this inconsistency which has been highlighted this weekend in lots of similar occurrences (curry, kriel, Carreras) with completely different outcomes just causes so much confusion and anger toward the officials, the game and the WRU.
Just make a good informed decision and just make it consistent

B
Bob Marler 466 days ago

Good

f
finn 466 days ago

As an england fan, i was quite happy to see curry get a red card because i thought it would stop south africans from whinging that referees and world rugby were biased against them. Little did I know it would just make everyone whinge even more. Can't we all just enjoy the game?

B
Bob Marler 466 days ago

High tackles can be coached out of the game. There has to be some incentive to do so. And not getting red cards is a pretty good incentive.

But the inconsistency in the application of the law is a big problem.

M
Mark 466 days ago

It's difficult to comprehend exactly where the rugby authorities imagine they are taking the game in regard to the completely arbitrary and frankly unfit for purpose process that currently masquerades as player safety protocols.
Virtually every game is now decided by yellow and red cards that are dished out like lucky dip lottery tickets.

A
Andrew 466 days ago

Hopefully not hyperbole, however rugby does seem to have an ability to shoot itself in the foot. So many red cards these days "according to the framework", are arguably rugby incidents and part of the risk we all have to accept when we play(ed) the game. There was no malice in the Curry tackle and, with the player coming down after catching a high ball, very easy to be sympathetic to his positioning. This was the point Victor Matfield made on the Rugby Pod this week. Then we have the inconsistency (e.g.) of the Kriel tackle v Scotland which wasn't even looked at, but arguably warranted sanction. I do believe that intent and common sense judgement need to be taken as opposed to the very programmatic and unsympathetic judgements made now.

M
Michael Röbbins (academic and writer extraordinair 466 days ago

A disgrace to a game quickly trying to ruin itself into oblivion. Probably didn’t even deserve a penalty and he gets a red card at, if we believe say Eddie Jones, the only meaningful rugby tourney that only happens twice a decade? And he already missed basically an entire game with it happening so early. Makes one need to puke. Gods out there please alleviate our species’ headlong sprint towards greater idiocy.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes
Search