Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

England boss Borthwick concerned by a curious Fijian penalty stat

(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Steve Borthwick has raised concerns about the number of penalties Fiji have won in recent matches, but the England coach won’t be able to meet with this Sunday’s Rugby World Cup quarter-final referee to discuss the matter.

ADVERTISEMENT

Following last weekend’s 18-17 English win on Lille, Samoa head coach Seilala Mapusua alleged that an unconscious refereeing bias existed whenever a tier two team plays a tier one side.

However, England boss Borthwick queried this allegation on Friday ahead of his team’s knockout clash with Fiji in Marseille.

Video Spacer

The Big Jim Show Live – RWC Semi Finals

Join Big Jim & special guests for the special live shows before and after each Semi Final live on Rugbypass TV

Watch Free

Video Spacer

The Big Jim Show Live – RWC Semi Finals

Join Big Jim & special guests for the special live shows before and after each Semi Final live on Rugbypass TV

Watch Free

The coach referenced the Fijians in some of their recent games – their Summer Nations Series Twickenham win over England and also their World Cup pool matches last month against Wales and Australia.

He then claimed that Fiji had won over 40 penalties in those fixtures while only conceding in the mid-20s and a search of the statistics proved him correct, the overall total coming in at 45 penalties conceded to Fiji’s 23.

Fixture
Rugby World Cup
England
30 - 24
Full-time
Fiji
All Stats and Data

In England’s August 26 game against the Pacific Islanders which was refereed by Jaco Peyper, the penalty count was 10-7 against Borthwick’s team.

Fifteen days later, versus Wales in Bordeaux on September 10 at the start of Pool C, Warren Gatland’s team came off worse on the penalty count – 17-9 – in a game that was handled by Matthew Carley while seven days later in Saint-Etienne, Eddie Jones’ Wallabies had an 18-7 penalty count against them in a match refereed by Andrew Brace.

ADVERTISEMENT

By coincidence, Brace was the official in charge of last weekend’s close England shave against Samoa and Borthwick was asked on Friday in Aix-en-Provence if the clarification he sought after that game led to anything.

This was the query that opened the door for him to bring Fiji’s penalty record into the conversation ahead of this weekend’s last-eight clash.

“Post-game I talked about aspects of the game and would seek clarity and I did, I received clarity,” began Borthwick before switching his attention to Fiji. “In terms of Fiji, we talk about them being an incredibly strong side.

“I know some statements have been made around tier one, tier two. The situation I have is in the three games Fiji played against England, Australia, Wales in the last few weeks, they have won over 40 penalties, conceded mid-20s.

ADVERTISEMENT

“So from that, you see a team that has a lot of penalties given to them. We have just got to control what we can control in the game and we will do that.”

Given that penalty count trend, would Borthwick be speaking to quarter-final referee Mathieu Raynal before kick-off in Marseille? No, was the answer. “It’s part of World Cup regulations you don’t speak to the referee in advance of the game,” he explained.

Owen Farrell is the England skipper tasked with on-pitch communications with the match officials. What will his approach with Raynal be? “Steve has just touched on it there, we have got to control what we can,” he said.

“If there is any sort of confusion you want to ask for clarity and want to ask what you can do better but in terms of what we can control, that is all that really matters to us.

“We talked about parts of our game now that are going to make big differences towards that. We hope we don’t have to speak to the referee.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

9 Comments
D
Drew 432 days ago

You don’t get given penalties, Steve. They get awarded against you.
Given how much Fiji like to attack Im not surprised penalties rack up against their opponents.

J
JD Kiwi 435 days ago

Farrell chatting with Raynal. What could possibly go wrong for England there?

B
Bob Marler 435 days ago

Is this what I think it is?

Is there some sort of insuation from Borthwick that… referees are doing something wrong?

Is Borthwick trying to… influence the refereeing?

I mean he can’t be. He’d get banned for months not being able to attend his teams games or have any part of the the team.

Where are the torches and pitch forks when you need them?

Oh wait. It’s England. They can do anything they like.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 24 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

143 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales
Search