Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

England don't need Erasmus they already have a World Cup gift

(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images and by Steve Haag/Gallo Images/Getty Images)

The emergency SOS proposal for England to sign Rassie Erasmus as head coach is simply not required. Lost in the hoopla over England’s third-place Six Nations finish is the lack of recognition that they already have been given a World Cup gift.

ADVERTISEMENT

But firstly on Erasmus, the saviour who prepped the Springboks to World Cup glory in 18 months, who has been floated as potentially doing the same thing for England.

The Springboks’ rise to World Cup glory wasn’t just 18 months in the making. The pieces were already there for Erasmus and his staff to do what they wanted to do, based on years of work beforehand with the Stormers, and the playing group in place.

Video Spacer

All Access | Malcolm O’Kelly

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time 0:00
 
1x
    • Chapters
    • descriptions off, selected
    • captions off, selected
      Video Spacer

      All Access | Malcolm O’Kelly

      The starting Springboks pack for the World Cup final was 75 percent current or ex-Stormers players.

      They had the cattle for Erasmus and Jacques Nienaber, his assistant coach at the time, to run their defensive systems and game plans, similar to what they had already done years beforehand at the Stormers in the late 2000’s and early 2010’s.

      Five of the Springboks starters in the forward pack were at the Stormers at the time, while a sixth, Duane Vermeulen was already very familiar with the style having played under Erasmus in Super Rugby. Three more forwards on the bench were ex-Stormers players.

      It was a Stormers defence, run by Stormers coaches, with largely Stormers forwards, moulded together in a two-year period to take advantage of the World Cup draw after losing to New Zealand.

      ADVERTISEMENT

      Many of the players – Eben Etzebeth, Pieter-Steph du Toit, Siya Kolisi – were in their mid-20s prime. If Erasmus is going to England, he cannot take the Stormers pack with him.

      There also is not a single club team in England with a pack like it that can come to the table at short notice with the level of understanding that already existed at the time with the Stormers in South Africa.

      Furthermore, Nienaber – a key member of Erasmus’ support staff – has now succeeded his former boss as head coach of the Springboks.

      There is zero chance he would leave at this point in time to join Erasmus’ coaching ticket in England or he’d risk putting the Boks into a period of instability.

      ADVERTISEMENT

      Neither Erasmus or Nienaber would have any desire to do that, you would think.

      When they took over the Springboks from Allister Coetzee, the flashy backs and style from the Lions was shown the door, and the Stormers’ forwards became the centrepiece of the Springboks’ game.

      It made the Springboks a competitive power once again, but did it not reach a dominant level of winning, it must be said.

      Erasmus, like it or not, won 59 percent of his games as head coach of the Springboks against tier one teams, with an overall record of 13-1-8 over 2018 and 2019.

      If you consider Nienaber an extension of Erasmus and include the 2021 season, that was 58 per cent against tier one teams with a 7-5 record.

      Since the start of this era of Springboks rugby, they have 20 wins, one draw and 13 losses against tier one opposition.

      Should that form hold true with England’s resource of players, 59 percent gives England no better chance of winning the World Cup in 2023 with Erasmus as head coach than Eddie Jones.

      It is widely accepted you need to win three tier one knockout fixtures in a row to win the Webb Ellis Cup. A touch below 60 percent gets you a semi-final appearance at best.

      England aren’t going to be any better off with Erasmus, and actually don’t need him anyway as they have been handed a red carpet through to the semi-final based on the form of their future opponents.

      Their 2023 World Cup campaign is going to be easier than that of a Six Nations.

      England’s toughest opponents in pool play might be Samoa. Argentina, who are regressing at a rapid rate, and Japan are the two other contenders. Los Pumas have had a torrid run since losing their Super Rugby franchise, the Jaguares, and are losing strength as a tier one nation. It is unlikely that trend reverses.

      For all the hope attached to Japan after their inspirational World Cup performance three years ago, they have played infrequently and were pummelled at the hands of Ireland in November.

      Samoa will receive a host of international recruits under World Rugby’s eligibility changes to bolster the strength of their World Cup squad, making them an intriguing prospect.

      England should win Pool D in a canter and will likely face Wales or Fiji, whoever is runner up in Pool C behind the Wallabies, in a generous quarter-final.

      Wales are trending in the wrong direction after losing to Italy and enduring a disappointing Six Nations. A quarter-final against Fiji, despite their enterprising play, would be welcomed with two hands by England.

      England have a potential cakewalk to a World Cup semi-final, should Wales fail to improve, which means they just have to win two tough games to claim the William Webb Ellis. This is on a silver platter.

      On the other side it will be a bloodbath.

      South Africa has a much tougher task than last time and this time will be a real test of their credentials. Pool games against Scotland and Ireland will be tough, but largely winnable fixtures.

      It’s not that they are likely to be underdogs, it’s that they will actually have to play a strong line-up, especially against Ireland.

      A Tonga side full of new recruits like Malakai Fekitoa, Israel Folau and Charles Piutau will also give the Springboks a physical game.

      What counts in tournament play is the freshest legs and being injury-free on the last day, and these pool games will count towards the price the Boks must pay to progress.

      Should they top Pool A after overcoming Ireland, Tonga and Scotland, they will play the runner-up of Pool B in the quarter-finals: France, playing on home soil, or New Zealand.

      There is a high probability the Springboks will play the All Blacks based on current form, with France topping New Zealand in the pool. The Springboks should dispatch Foster’s side, but it will take a heavy toll as history shows.

      Only the 1991 Wallabies side have won the World Cup after knocking out New Zealand before the final. Every other side has fallen short: France (1999), Australia (2003), France (2007), England (2019).

      By the time they reach the semi-final, the Springboks would already have played a tougher schedule than their 2019 win. England will barely get out of second gear into the semi-final stage.

      South Africa need Erasmus on board to prepare for their encore, England don’t.

      England have to pull it together in 18 months for two big knockout games. It is a lesser ask than a Grand Slam Six Nations title.

      Eddie Jones will never get a better chance to coach a team to a Rugby World Cup victory with this silver platter schedule.

       

      ADVERTISEMENT

      Classic Wallabies vs British & Irish Legends | First Match | Full Match Replay

      Did the Lions loosies get away with murder? And revisiting the Springboks lift | Whistle Watch

      The First Test, Visiting The Great Barrier Reef & Poetry with Pierre | Ep 6: The Ultimate Test

      KOKO Show | July 22nd | Full Throttle with Brisbane Test Review and Melbourne Preview

      New Zealand v South Africa | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

      USA vs England | Men's International | Full Match Replay

      France v Argentina | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

      Lions Share | Episode 4

      Trending on RugbyPass

      Comments

      15 Comments
      p
      peter 1219 days ago

      While your analysis of which players were available at the start of Erasmus era you might just begrudgingly admit that coaches do have considerable impact on a team's success Tootie had the same players available He could not coach squat He has disappeared from sight Please choose the same coach who coached the 2015 English side to ignominy

      l
      lot 1220 days ago

      great insight. england 2019 was quite the path to beat the 4 rgby championship teams. they may just get their reward in 2023..

      J
      Johnny 1220 days ago

      The statistics of Rassie and Nienaber's winning percentages has no relevance when it comes to World Cup's as the Springboks have never lost to a Northern Hemisphere team

      s
      stu 1220 days ago

      History repeats...all.blacks knocked out in World Cup in Quarters again in France...will they just wear the grey jerseys to play the part?!

      B
      BF 1221 days ago

      Balanced, rational, reasonable . . . lucid . . . who are you and what you have done to Ben? Just kidding mate - good piece - and greetings from sunny Saffa land.

      C
      Christiaan 1221 days ago

      Quite an interesting article. What the writer fails to take into account is that an easy pool might just lead to the detriment of the English side. They will reach the Semis without having been tested thoroughly. Going from holiday mode into a Semi against a battle-hardened Bok, French or Kiwi side will count against them.

      R
      RJ 1221 days ago

      I don't think anyone was ever suggesting Rassie is going to sign for England 18 months out from the WC. That's just being silly.


      I think the point was that England could change their coach now (similar to how SA did) and still be able to do well in the next WC... because that's what Rassie did with SA.


      England have an abundance of top-quality players, only time will tell if they're make the step to become international or world class - such as SA did.


      I'd say no, not likely. The transition has been handled really poorly.


      We should have been transitioning some of these players 12 months ago. Dombradt and Simmonds were ready, Marcus Smith should have been coming off the bench, we should have let Manu play week-in, week-out for Sale and we should have been looking to develop a hard running centre to give England for go-forward and to fix defenses to be able to get to the edge more often.


      We are 12 months behind, we'll be really fortunate with the draw and injuries to go well in the WC.

      R
      Ruan 1221 days ago

      Rassie and Nienaber was director of rugby and defense coach at the Stormes from 2008 to 2011. To claim that their influence in this period somehow magically prepared players who barely featured during this period is bizarre. Siya made his Super Rugby debut in 2012 and Frans Malherbe only played 4 games in 2011, Kitshoff 5. Eben, PSDT and Bongi weren't involved with the union back then. Only Vermeulen and Louw were regulars under Erasmus (Allister Coetzee was then the head coach, funny his much longer Stormers association isn't mentioned!)

      i
      isaac 1221 days ago

      Hopefully the Drua players lay the foundation to a strong Fijian side at 2023

      s
      sean 1221 days ago

      Couldn’t disagree more with this assessment. The boks were low on confidence outplayed by Italy hammered 57-0 by the all blacks , 40 point drubbing by Ireland, heck any team could beat a team 7th in the world rankings. it was hardly a base for Rassie to work with in fact it was the opposite. England are in a far better place than South Africa were 18 months out and they just need focus and settle on a team. The converse is also true about having easier matches leading to a big match, South Africa put England away for one simple reason they wanted it more and England already thought they had one hand on the trophy

      J
      John 1221 days ago

      True! the fact is Rassie completely out smarted Eddie at every level in the final. Forget about how they got there. The Stormers never won anything during that period. they were poor. The first thing Rassie did was to take the egos out of play. Seems to me there are a lot of egos in the England setup with the biggest being EJ.

      L
      LY 1221 days ago

      Except South Africa DID have the pieces 18 months out, but Rassie & his staff made the difference. Who will England select instead of their current team? Rassie basically took that shambolic Springbok team and tweaked it. Can Eddie tweak something he's built and apparently is proud of? Rassie came in with new ideas. Eddie just doesn't have any.

      P
      Poorfour 1221 days ago

      That's a very fair point - and it's worth making the comparison with England's schedule in 2019, which saw them having to play 5 tier 1 teams on successive weekends - Argentina, France, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa.


      With hindsight, South Africa's schedule - with their loss to NZ followed by Namibia, Italy, Canada, Japan and Wales before facing England, was ideal, with each match after the first adding a bit more challenge (if a few more banana skins) without requiring them to play absolutely top drawer opposition until the final itself.

      c
      carl 1220 days ago

      England did play one game less, their game against France was cancelled because of the massive storm. Italy v NZ was cancelled too. So yeah England had a bye week. Wales were a good team at the World Cup, thumped Australia.

      Load More Comments

      Join free and tell us what you really think!

      Sign up for free
      ADVERTISEMENT

      Latest Features

      Comments on RugbyPass

      M
      MO 30 minutes ago
      Half-back depth is the flaw in 'Razor's' 4-4-4 Rugby World Cup plan

      Yes the team selection for the ABs vs Italy was one of the most perplexing things I have ever seen from an AB coach. It showed the Razor was too scared… compare that to Rassie. When you have a scared coach, its a recipe for disaster. Instead of giving some of the young guns a chance, he chose to play players who had played England, Ireland and France on successive Saturdays, they were “shot” - it was a win, but the team looked beat and lacked any real drive.


      Razor has shown already this year, that he sees this as a mistake. But even then there were some strange decisions for the 3rd French test. Bower in for Norris - Norris is the future, Bower is not. Dropping Proctor for ALB was also weird, given ALB hasnt played in 2 months and basically we know what he can and cant do. Proctor would have benefited from a 3rd straight game. Now I know some people will say ALB scored a try - 5 points. I would say, he also gave away two penalties, where the French scored 6 points.


      Finally, the return of Sevu Reece - while I dont dispute at SR level he’s a star, and he really works to get involved. But unfortunately, he lacks the real speed to be an international winger - he was left behind by Jordan for his try, and I cant forget the French winger burning him for pace last November. OK I understand Clarke and Ioane were injured, and the seem not to like Narawa - but this says our winger stocks are pretty low if we have to rely on Sevu.

      60 Go to comments
      LONG READ
      LONG READ Ben Kay: 'I've never seen a Lions team attack so well; Finn Russell is unplayable' Ben Kay: 'I've never seen a Lions team attack so well; Finn Russell is unplayable'